Blue States Lead in Hate Crimes--California The Leader---FBI Stats

originally posted by: luciferslight

originally posted by: luciferslight

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: jtma508
a reply to: TinfoilTP


Let's see if I can explain statistics and the irresponsible use of numbers to you. Let's say we have two fictitious states: State A and State B. State A has 12 incidents of hate crimes and State B has 4. Which is worse? If you chose either State A or State B dunk your head in the toilet repeatedly and write on your computer screen 'I'm too stupid to be posting on ATS'. Why? because, like the OP, you don't have all the numbers to make that determination.


Now, State A has a population of 10,000 people. Population of State B is 1,000. Now, having this additional information, you can see that even though State B had a lower number of total incidents, hate crimes for State B was over 3 times higher than that that of State A.


This is how easy it is to use numbers to mislead people.

No, if State A is Blue, then it has more hateful liberals which means it has more hate crimes that happen.

gh

:flamerDe

originally posted by: luciferslight

originally posted by: luciferslight

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: jtma508
a reply to: TinfoilTP


Let's see if I can explain statistics and the irresponsible use of numbers to you. Let's say we have two fictitious states: State A and State B. State A has 12 incidents of hate crimes and State B has 4. Which is worse? If you chose either State A or State B dunk your head in the toilet repeatedly and write on your computer screen 'I'm too stupid to be posting on ATS'. Why? because, like the OP, you don't have all the numbers to make that determination.


Now, State A has a population of 10,000 people. Population of State B is 1,000. Now, having this additional information, you can see that even though State B had a lower number of total incidents, hate crimes for State B was over 3 times higher than that that of State A.


This is how easy it is to use numbers to mislead people.

No, if State A is Blue, then it has more hateful liberals which means it has more hate crimes that happen.

gh

:flamerDe

originally posted by: luciferslight

originally posted by: luciferslight

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: jtma508
a reply to: TinfoilTP


Let's see if I can explain statistics and the irresponsible use of numbers to you. Let's say we have two fictitious states: State A and State B. State A has 12 incidents of hate crimes and State B has 4. Which is worse? If you chose either State A or State B dunk your head in the toilet repeatedly and write on your computer screen 'I'm too stupid to be posting on ATS'. Why? because, like the OP, you don't have all the numbers to make that determination.


Now, State A has a population of 10,000 people. Population of State B is 1,000. Now, having this additional information, you can see that even though State B had a lower number of total incidents, hate crimes for State B was over 3 times higher than that that of State A.


This is how easy it is to use numbers to mislead people.

No, if State A is Blue, then it has more hateful liberals which means it has more hate crimes that happen.

gh

:flamerDe

originally posted by: luciferslight

originally posted by: luciferslight

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: jtma508
a reply to: TinfoilTP


Let's see if I can explain statistics and the irresponsible use of numbers to you. Let's say we have two fictitious states: State A and State B. State A has 12 incidents of hate crimes and State B has 4. Which is worse? If you chose either State A or State B dunk your head in the toilet repeatedly and write on your computer screen 'I'm too stupid to be posting on ATS'. Why? because, like the OP, you don't have all the numbers to make that determination.


Now, State A has a population of 10,000 people. Population of State B is 1,000. Now, having this additional information, you can see that even though State B had a lower number of total incidents, hate crimes for State B was over 3 times higher than that that of State A.


This is how easy it is to use numbers to mislead people.

No, if State A is Blue, then it has more hateful liberals which means it has more hate crimes that happen.

gh

:flamerDe

originally posted by: luciferslight

originally posted by: luciferslight

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: jtma508
a reply to: TinfoilTP


Let's see if I can explain statistics and the irresponsible use of numbers to you. Let's say we have two fictitious states: State A and State B. State A has 12 incidents of hate crimes and State B has 4. Which is worse? If you chose either State A or State B dunk your head in the toilet repeatedly and write on your computer screen 'I'm too stupid to be posting on ATS'. Why? because, like the OP, you don't have all the numbers to make that determination.


Now, State A has a population of 10,000 people. Population of State B is 1,000. Now, having this additional information, you can see that even though State B had a lower number of total incidents, hate crimes for State B was over 3 times higher than that that of State A.


This is how easy it is to use numbers to mislead people.

No, if State A is Blue, then it has more hateful liberals which means it has more hate crimes that happen.

gh

:flamerDe

originally posted by: luciferslight

originally posted by: luciferslight

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: jtma508
a reply to: TinfoilTP


Let's see if I can explain statistics and the irresponsible use of numbers to you. Let's say we have two fictitious states: State A and State B. State A has 12 incidents of hate crimes and State B has 4. Which is worse? If you chose either State A or State B dunk your head in the toilet repeatedly and write on your computer screen 'I'm too stupid to be posting on ATS'. Why? because, like the OP, you don't have all the numbers to make that determination.


Now, State A has a population of 10,000 people. Population of State B is 1,000. Now, having this additional information, you can see that even though State B had a lower number of total incidents, hate crimes for State B was over 3 times higher than that that of State A.


This is how easy it is to use numbers to mislead people.

No, if State A is Blue, then it has more hateful liberals which means it has more hate crimes that happen.

gh

:flamerDe

originally posted by: luciferslight

originally posted by: luciferslight

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: jtma508
a reply to: TinfoilTP


Let's see if I can explain statistics and the irresponsible use of numbers to you. Let's say we have two fictitious states: State A and State B. State A has 12 incidents of hate crimes and State B has 4. Which is worse? If you chose either State A or State B dunk your head in the toilet repeatedly and write on your computer screen 'I'm too stupid to be posting on ATS'. Why? because, like the OP, you don't have all the numbers to make that determination.


Now, State A has a population of 10,000 people. Population of State B is 1,000. Now, having this additional information, you can see that even though State B had a lower number of total incidents, hate crimes for State B was over 3 times higher than that that of State A.


This is how easy it is to use numbers to mislead people.

No, if State A is Blue, then it has more hateful liberals which means it has more hate crimes that happen.

gh

:flamerDe

originally posted by: luciferslight

originally posted by: luciferslight

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: jtma508
a reply to: TinfoilTP


Let's see if I can explain statistics and the irresponsible use of numbers to you. Let's say we have two fictitious states: State A and State B. State A has 12 incidents of hate crimes and State B has 4. Which is worse? If you chose either State A or State B dunk your head in the toilet repeatedly and write on your computer screen 'I'm too stupid to be posting on ATS'. Why? because, like the OP, you don't have all the numbers to make that determination.


Now, State A has a population of 10,000 people. Population of State B is 1,000. Now, having this additional information, you can see that even though State B had a lower number of total incidents, hate crimes for State B was over 3 times higher than that that of State A.


This is how easy it is to use numbers to mislead people.

No, if State A is Blue, then it has more hateful liberals which means it has more hate crimes that happen.

gh

:flamerDe

originally posted by: luciferslight

originally posted by: luciferslight

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: jtma508
a reply to: TinfoilTP


Let's see if I can explain statistics and the irresponsible use of numbers to you. Let's say we have two fictitious states: State A and State B. State A has 12 incidents of hate crimes and State B has 4. Which is worse? If you chose either State A or State B dunk your head in the toilet repeatedly and write on your computer screen 'I'm too stupid to be posting on ATS'. Why? because, like the OP, you don't have all the numbers to make that determination.


Now, State A has a population of 10,000 people. Population of State B is 1,000. Now, having this additional information, you can see that even though State B had a lower number of total incidents, hate crimes for State B was over 3 times higher than that that of State A.


This is how easy it is to use numbers to mislead people.

No, if State A is Blue, then it has more hateful liberals which means it has more hate crimes that happen.

gh

:flamerDe

originally posted by: luciferslight

originally posted by: luciferslight

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: jtma508
a reply to: TinfoilTP


Let's see if I can explain statistics and the irresponsible use of numbers to you. Let's say we have two fictitious states: State A and State B. State A has 12 incidents of hate crimes and State B has 4. Which is worse? If you chose either State A or State B dunk your head in the toilet repeatedly and write on your computer screen 'I'm too stupid to be posting on ATS'. Why? because, like the OP, you don't have all the numbers to make that determination.


Now, State A has a population of 10,000 people. Population of State B is 1,000. Now, having this additional information, you can see that even though State B had a lower number of total incidents, hate crimes for State B was over 3 times higher than that that of State A.


This is how easy it is to use numbers to mislead people.

No, if State A is Blue, then it has more hateful liberals which means it has more hate crimes that happen.

gh

:flamerDe

originally posted by: luciferslight

originally posted by: luciferslight

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: jtma508
a reply to: TinfoilTP


Let's see if I can explain statistics and the irresponsible use of numbers to you. Let's say we have two fictitious states: State A and State B. State A has 12 incidents of hate crimes and State B has 4. Which is worse? If you chose either State A or State B dunk your head in the toilet repeatedly and write on your computer screen 'I'm too stupid to be posting on ATS'. Why? because, like the OP, you don't have all the numbers to make that determination.


Now, State A has a population of 10,000 people. Population of State B is 1,000. Now, having this additional information, you can see that even though State B had a lower number of total incidents, hate crimes for State B was over 3 times higher than that that of State A.


This is how easy it is to use numbers to mislead people.

No, if State A is Blue, then it has more hateful liberals which means it has more hate crimes that happen.

gh

:flamerDe

a reply to: seasonal

Jesus, that source who is literally a mouth piece for the Trump campaign can never be trusted so now I have to read the FBI link and what do you know, it never states which US states these hate crimes occur.

www.fbi.gov...

a reply to: luciferslight

Holy S####! You've won the repost game! Beat my score of 9, or was it 6? Either way, COMBO BREAKER!!!!!!

a reply to: luciferslight

Have you tried turning it off and on again?

a reply to: Swills

Source was already covered.

Jesus, that source who is literally a mouth piece for the Trump campaign can never be trusted so now I have to read the FBI link and what do you know, it never states which US states these hate crimes occur.

a reply to: seasonal

The states with the most hate crime offenses in 2015 were California–with over 1,000 hate crimes–while New York, New Jersey, Washington State, and Massachusetts followed closely behind.

This seems to have more to do with population areas than by state. Washington State is an anomaly in that. Though, outside of the metro population area Of Seattle-Tacoma, the areas are way less blue. Hate crimes do exist in the blue areas as well. Idaho isn't the only state this way that has had pockets of racial division due to White Nationalism.
I'd wager more of the hate crimes come out of the Spokane(very red city downtown area has voted blue a bit) area which is very connected to North Idaho. Though, I do recall a more recent one reported in Olympia(west side -state capital).

Lol. Everything that gets posted on this site gets proven to be a lie. The most gullible people on the internet right here on ats.

originally posted by: BrokedownChevy
Lol. Everything that gets posted on this site gets proven to be a lie. The most gullible people on the internet right here on ats.

And, you're here.

a reply to: BrokedownChevy

I seem to remember a whole lot of people say something about a Trump win.

Lol. Everything that gets posted on this site gets proven to be a lie. The most gullible people on the internet right here on ats.

a reply to: TinfoilTP

You win. You get the award for the single most ignorant response I have ever seen on ATS. And brother, THAT is saying something. God help this country.