Stabuck, SJW, Snowflakes, Thick Rim Glasses, Skinny Jeans, Video Game masters-Riot-what do you do?

Riots Break Out Across The Nation In Response To Trump Presidency

In response to Donald Trumps victory and becoming our 45th President, riots broke out across the U.S. of anti-Trump protesters after the announcement late mid morning with further protest and riots in the afternoon and evening spreading.

Anti-trump “not my president” protesters burned the American flag across the U.S. in several states in resentment of the elected President Donald Trump seen on pictures and video on social media.

wearechange.org...

As I looked at the rioters on the live feed from the fairest of cities New York. It struck me as odd that all these young adults looked like the ones I have seen skurring away from J Crew at the mall with goodies in hand and ear buds a blazing.

I live in a rural area, and I can't imagine this group rioting out here, unless there was a long line of Ubers dropping them off about 100 yards down the road (no bus stops out here). The cell reception gets spotty so there is another huge problem, does a riot occur with out a tweet?

So when you see this motley crew sashaying down the street toward your property what is your reaction?

a reply to: seasonal

Conservatives would have done the same thing if Hillary would have won, emboldened by the fact that Donald would have told them it was rigged and somebody cheated.

Pot meet kettle.

~Tenth

How is this a political issue?

What would you do if "insert stereotype" protesters were headed towards you? I would distract them with "insert stereotype".

a reply to: seasonal
They don't know any better. Its not their fault.

Millennial International: Sponsor a Millennial Today



:

a reply to: tothetenthpower

what kind of logical fallacy is this?

a reply to: eNumbra

How is this a political issue? What would you do if "insert stereotype" protesters were headed towards you? I would distract them with "insert stereotype".

The riots are occurring because the HRC product wasn't elected instead the Trump product was.

The rioters I described looked exactly like my description.

a reply to: tothetenthpower

Conservatives would have done the same thing if Hillary would have won, emboldened by the fact that Donald would have told them it was rigged and somebody cheated.

Conservatives don't riot, they revolt. There is a huge difference.

a reply to: snarfbot

It happens to be a fact, which is why it may be confusing to some people, especially people living in a nation which just elected a person who has no actual policy worth a god damn, and whose firmest plans involve violations of the first amendment and institutional discrimination against minorities.

The ones in Omaha are standing around chanting, and then being barraged with pepper balls.

originally posted by: snarfbot
a reply to: tothetenthpower

what kind of logical fallacy is this?

Is the truth a logical fallacy now? Suddenly a lot makes sense.

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: eNumbra

How is this a political issue? What would you do if "insert stereotype" protesters were headed towards you? I would distract them with "insert stereotype".

The riots are occurring because the HRC product wasn't elected instead the Trump product was.

The rioters I described looked exactly like my description.

Uh-huh.

a reply to: TrueBrit

no it isnt, its unfalsifiable for starters, it cant be proven as it hasnt and can now never happen.

you can speculate all you want but dont pretend to know, say its fact and generalize half the country as criminals to make the actions of a few of the other half look more reasonable.

"the conservatives would have done the same" totally fallacious, maybe put it under a special case of two wrongs make a right fallacy.

a reply to: snarfbot

No logical fallacy.

It's just pointing out that regardless of who won, there was going to be a set group of people who were butt hurt, and who would protest about it.

~Tenth

a reply to: tothetenthpower

Conservatives don't have rioters on their roster,hired through the teamsters union like the Democratic party does,where you been? had them since the 60's,my father helped form union in So Calif harbor in the 50's very politically active,in the 70's he was against them,infiltrated by organized crime who work with dem socialist party,it's a joke hope Calif breaks from NATU,that is going to happen no matter what,we are broke owe more money then could possibly be paid back,dollar will collapse any day,and the government has these fools supporting these give away programs,can't they see you can't get money from no where,so they riot because the truth is too hard for them to accept,because they grew up on mainstream media and TV,I'm old I'll die soon,but the future looks bleak,young people better wake up,we will be the new Argentina default on all our loans

originally posted by: tothetenthpower
It's just pointing out that regardless of who won, there was going to be a set group of people who were butt hurt, and who would protest about it.

I was watching the news earlier and there was one outraged dude screaming that Hillary got more votes and that the Electoral College needs to be challenged in the Supreme Court because: sore loser.

I cannot imagine there would not be the same cries if the roles were reversed specifically because Trump had said the very same thing this man said four years ago.

a reply to: tothetenthpower

youre back pedaling now, the op is about rioting in the streets. thats a step beyond protest. put a variable on that, x is rioting in the streets. and you said, y would do the same thing, creating an illogical argument.

a reply to: Oldtimer2

Conservatives don't have rioters on their roster,hired through the teamsters union like the Democratic party does,where you been?

Oh for the love of god. Conservatives were saying they were going to revolt, guns and blood in the street if Hillary won the election, give it a break.

~Tenth

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I was watching the news earlier and there was one outraged dude screaming that Hillary got more votes and that the Electoral College needs to be challenged in the Supreme Court because: sore loser.

Ignorant, it would take a constitutional convention to "get rid" of the electoral college. And look at the map, red states won't let that happen.

originally posted by: snarfbot
a reply to: tothetenthpower

youre back pedaling now, the op is about rioting in the streets. thats a step beyond protest. put a variable on that, x. and you said, y would do the same thing, creating an illogical argument.

Oh i'm not back peddling, I don't think riots are good on either side, but there would have been regardless.

Your political affiliation isn't an indicator of what you will do a in group think scenario.

It only takes one person to influence the rest generally.

~Tenth

a reply to: tothetenthpower

a reply to: eNumbra

Hmm... I don't don't remember seeing riots and flag burnings when Obama won the last two elections

I don't remember people demanding the next day off from work, school and college so they could cry and throw temper tantrums.

originally posted by: seasonal
Ignorant, it would take a constitutional convention to "get rid" of the electoral college. And look at the map, red states won't let that happen.

Totally ignorant but that is what butt-hurt does to you, it makes you stop thinking with your brain.