Anonymous Hillary Clinton! It is Done! Check Mate!

a reply to: AboveBoard

I too am burnt out.

But unfortunately, things will only be partially normal on Nov 9...1/2 the people are going to be pissed....there will be a huge discussion on rigged voting, followed by massive discussions on whether they be impeached before or after taking office. Once they make it to office, then the discussion switches to actually impeaching them.

Either one is going to be tied up in courts and senate hearings for at least their first year and fighting impeachment efforts.


Looks like nobody really wins anything come Nov. 9, 2016.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: interupt42

I watched CNN (Lemon) last night to see how this was being reported.
Beyond a discussion on how awful Comey is for reopening the investigation...It wasn't.

And I strongly recall how CNN told us not to look at anything ... because it was against the law for us ... but, it was okay for them.

And now that their candidate has become a pariah ... crickets.

Best idea ... get out and vote. Laugh and mock any Clintonites who show their faces at the polls.

a reply to: iTruthSeeker

Not sure when Anonymous has actually ever done much of anything, nor will it matter. The MSM won't report it, so the lemmings will refuse it exists.

Is that you Bill?

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: iTruthSeeker

When she is charged, found guilty in a fair trial and sentenced to prison - I will say yeehaw. Until then, all this poppycock from "anonymous sources" annoys me.

mm, I see your point.

you know, we should ask Seth Rich if he would have found it better to release that information as an anonymous reporter.

oh.. wait..

a reply to: facedye

More conspiracy theories... If something comes out that is legitimate, it needs to be dealt with by the authorities, not wikileaks, and not right wing blogs or 4chan or Godlike Productions.

a reply to: bender151

If you don't know what we have done, you don't know our History.

a reply to: XAn0nym0usX
So are you claiming to be Anonymous? Good. Then explain why you guys sent out that message! Are you trying to keep everyone from reading WikiLeaks? I find the message that was sent out VERY misleading. You guys working for Hillary?

a reply to: Martin75

People continue to get this confused, Anonymous is not "One" we are Many, we do not control what other An0ns say as that would be Hypocritical to our cause, we are "Decentralized" but we do have "Organizers", we have OP's that any An0n can participate in, we do not endorse any Candidate, we do not work for Trump or Hillary or the Russians, we go where we are needed.


People expect us to "Destroy" someone based on Political Ideology, you are focusing on the wrong thing, you sit back and expect us to "Do the work" to satisfy your Agenda, you waste your time with the puppet while we are giving you the master

originally posted by: XAn0nym0usX
a reply to: Martin75

People continue to get this confused, Anonymous is not "One" we are Many, we do not control what other An0ns say as that would be Hypocritical to our cause, we are "Decentralized" but we do have "Organizers", we have OP's that any An0n can participate in, we do not endorse any Candidate, we do not work for Trump or Hillary or the Russians, we go where we are needed.


People expect us to "Destroy" someone based on Political Ideology, you are focusing on the wrong thing, you sit back and expect us to "Do the work" to satisfy your Agenda, you waste your time with the puppet while we are giving you the master

With all due respect, you havent given us anything as earth shattering as you claim yet.

a reply to: XAn0nym0usX
Nope, I do my own work. I just expect you NOT to spread garbage! The message that was posted

Link to image

has caused a bunch of confusion and it seems to be a lie. So in my eyes it was basically Annon stopping people from looking at the WikiLeaks release. Shame on you! If you are going to spread a message at least make it an honest one. All that message has done is scare people away from digging through WikiLeaks. What, were they taking your thunder? It is moments like this that people lose all faith in Annon.

BE carefull downloading that! The description for the release says that there is pornographic images and that with minors. So be very very careful with that download.

Read the description if you need to,
pbs.twimg.com...

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: facedye

More conspiracy theories... If something comes out that is legitimate, it needs to be dealt with by the authorities, not wikileaks, and not right wing blogs or 4chan or Godlike Productions.

I agree with you.

I have been reading these threads, but I'm not really seeing any "WOW" Smoking gun.

I worked for some corporate Biggie Wigs - - and all sorts of conversations took place back and forth in email exchanges - - - that if you pulled them out of context - - - not knowing what the full conversation was - - - they'd appear very damning.

So, I wait.

What did Assange say? The info is there IF the US government chose to use it to go after Hillary.

All this stuff is playing with my emotions. We are down to the last few days to replace some of these fools calling the shots, and nothing has been truly "dropped" that I feel will make a difference before then.

originally posted by: AboveBoard
a reply to: SonOfThor

Then why upload it anonymously at all? Just indict her already. That would be so toxic no AG would dare say no, especially since it could be leaked to the press.

It makes no sense. God I can't wait till this election is over and we only see threads like this a few times per week instead of every few hours...

I think what's happening here is that there is an overlap between the new emails/info found on Weiner's laptop and the new emails/info that Wikileaks has been dumping.

In other words - both the FBI and Wikileaks have some (or all) of the same new emails and information.

And it's obviously Wikileaks doing the uploading not the FBI...and as much as they might like to, Wikileaks can't indict anyone.

That's my thoughts related to this.

But, who knows?

a reply to: iTruthSeeker

Before the coffin is sealed, we need to drive a stake through her heart to make sure she doesn't rise from the dead.

originally posted by: xizd1
a reply to: iTruthSeeker

Before the coffin is sealed, we need to drive a stake through her heart to make sure she doesn't rise from the dead.

I question if even that would do the trick.

unbelieveable

Seriously, don't hold your breath.

Anon is free to upload 100Gb to Wikileaks if they want to, but it's highly doubtful much of anything would actually be released before the election by going that route.

100GB is a LOT of data to verify, and Wikileaks isn't going to just publish Photoshopped Clinton/CP images (with an obligatory Pepe face tossed in) that some low level Anon threw in the mix just for lulz.

Assuming this isn't all just a lie, this was a horribly timed release given the method they're choosing (to go through Wikileaks).

originally posted by: Tekaran
All this stuff is playing with my emotions. We are down to the last few days to replace some of these fools calling the shots, and nothing has been truly "dropped" that I feel will make a difference before then.

That ought to tell you something -- THEY DON'T HAVE ANYTHING.