It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Anonymous Hillary Clinton! It is Done! Check Mate!

page: 8
73
<< 5  6  7    9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 03:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: lSkrewloosel
a reply to: iTruthSeeker

even though i like the idea of Annon - they will be the reason as to why internet will be shutdown and changed to a China style internet. just gives TPTB more reason to restrict usage based on "hacktivists"

same goes for wikileaks.


That may be true.

But, it would only stop the everyday "normal" user.




posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 03:58 PM
link   
Good, someone (in this case Anonymous) needs to just release everything already. I've grown tired of this whole mess. If she's guilty then she's guilty, release the damn emails. And then hack Trump and do the same for him.
edit on FripmFri, 04 Nov 2016 15:59:49 -0500k2016-11-04T15:59:49-05:0003pm201645 by Darkchao45 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 04:03 PM
link   
a reply to: kaylaluv

How do you go to the authorities when the authorities are the lapdogs of the corrupt? You go to the people.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 04:11 PM
link   
Sooooooo where is the evidence?



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 04:25 PM
link   
a reply to: RomeByFire

Tell that to Chelsea Manning, Barrett Brown, Chris Doyon, Julian Assange to name a few. if you think We have done nothing, again you don't know our history or what has been accomplished

Who do you think gets information to WikiLeaks and other reliable sources?



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 04:31 PM
link   
a reply to: iTruthSeeker

So let me guess, Hillary and /or bill molesting kids at sex slave island.

I hope they are gaddafi'ed



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 04:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: BrokedownChevy
Sooooooo where is the evidence?


Evidence of what?

Who are you talking to?

Actually replying to the post in question really helps people know who/what you're talking about.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 05:25 PM
link   
a reply to: Riffrafter

Ah I see. You are being intentionally obtuse because you're butthurt over yet another failed witchhunt. Obviously I am referring to the OP because I'm in this very thread. Derp.

All the wrong doing lady. Where is it? I kept hearing about videos, pictures, and emails. I'm sorry this whole wacky shtshow has you so captivated, but anonymous says they're dumping data and implying this will implicate Hillary in illegal activities. That is the subject of the thread. The evidence. Do you understand how to interpret things or does everyone have to spell it out for you?



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 06:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: BrokedownChevy
a reply to: Riffrafter

Ah I see. You are being intentionally obtuse because you're butthurt over yet another failed witchhunt. Obviously I am referring to the OP because I'm in this very thread. Derp.

All the wrong doing lady. Where is it? I kept hearing about videos, pictures, and emails. I'm sorry this whole wacky shtshow has you so captivated, but anonymous says they're dumping data and implying this will implicate Hillary in illegal activities. That is the subject of the thread. The evidence. Do you understand how to interpret things or does everyone have to spell it out for you?


You're a little bit entertaining.

I'm not a bit hurt - butt or otherwise - about anything.

But, feel free to jabber on meaninglessly and wonder why no one responds to you except to ask you the wtf you're talking about.

You're contributions and impact here are enormous.

Keep up the good work!



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 06:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Riffrafter

Well that poster replied to the thread soooooo....seems pretty obvious.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 06:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Riffrafter

Your contributions have been enormous as well!! You've been able to break down the massive trove of information Anonymous has released for the common man. Your in depth analysis of all this data has been invaluable.
edit on 4-11-2016 by raymundoko because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 06:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: Riffrafter

Well that poster replied to the thread soooooo....seems pretty obvious.


Did you actually read the OP? Because when someone responds to the thread they are responding to the first post.

I don't see the OP making any claims that require evidence, hence my question.

I was actually just trying to help by clarifying exactly what evidence he was asking about. You'll notice he never mentioned anything specific at all. Just a random general statement.

No matter - I'm happy to talk with anyone here that provides some basis for dialogue - whether I happen to agree with that person or not.

But I'm not going to waste my time on people that just fling generalizations and random crap out. I don't engage with the willfully ignorant.

Have a terrific day.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 06:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: Riffrafter

Your contributions have been enormous as well!! You've been able to break down the massive trove of information Anonymous has released for the common man. Your in depth analysis of all this data has been invaluable.


No - that is the basis of the info presented by the OP.

I am *not* the OP.

Please try and keep up.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 07:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: RomeByFire

originally posted by: Greggers

originally posted by: Snarl

Laugh and mock any Clintonites who show their faces at the polls.


Voter intimidation of this sort is illegal.


They don't care about legality, they just want their way.

Remember - if Trump does in fact win, be sure to remind everyone that "the election is rigged," and watch how quickly the deflections start coming.



He won. Rigged or not.

What's there to deflect?




posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 08:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Riffrafter

You sound ridiculous. It has been days since the OP, hence this was a hoax. You have added no value.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 08:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Riffrafter

You can't even easily determine that a poster was replying to the OP, yet you are telling others to keep up? Quite comical.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 09:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

It ain't over till it's over. Nov 8th.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 10:21 PM
link   
a reply to: BrokedownChevy

Whilst i think there is more than enough evidence already out there to reasonably deem Clinton as a wholly unsuitable candidate, and possibly much worse, i agree with you to the extent that all i am seeing is a lot of talk and posturing from Anon and bugger all bombshell evidence to finish this once and for all.

The next 4/5 days decide more than Trump or Clinton's fate. The credibilities of the likes of Anon, Wikileaks and Dr. Steve are on the line. If there is no bombshell (and by that i mean irrefutable evidence of the Clinton's paedophilia, for example) then all of the very good work done thus far will have been lessened. Wikileaks has released mountains of good stuff but they keep us on tenterhooks and there needs to be a big reveal. Now.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 10:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Innocuous
a reply to: Annee

It ain't over till it's over. Nov 8th.


I don't think the "Clinton-Trump" circus will ever be over.



posted on Nov, 5 2016 @ 01:38 AM
link   
Heh, there are some great threads on this site but you guys are way too gullible. When someone makes a post on a site like 4chan it is the norm that they are labelled as "anonymous". They can be anyone, it doesn't mean that they belong to some sort of group. In fact users often intentionally post made up stuff to get a rise out of others.


originally posted by: Riffrafter
I don't see the OP making any claims that require evidence, hence my question.


I'm pretty sure he was talking about the child porn evidence.




top topics



 
73
<< 5  6  7    9 >>

log in

join