It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

The Electoral College is a Full Win For Clinton

page: 4
16
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 11:36 PM
link   
a reply to: CriticalStinker


I don't blame you, but he was the closest anti establishment candidate I've seen in my life time.


He was an anti establishment candidate... Then he went and endorsed Hillary.

I have to question the integrity of anyone who could run on a platform of anti-corruption and then do a complete 180 and endorse the most blatantly corrupt candidate in the history of the US elections.

What does that say about a person when they are willing to compromise their most morally directed positions?

He was even a victim of the corruption himself, and he still endorsed her! He's a total tool.




posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 11:40 PM
link   
a reply to: ColdWisdom

I hear he's actually starting to sort of speak out against her, but it's in a way that saves his own arse and still endorses her. He basically says that Clinton should be more honest or whatever, but continues to say that when she is President if she does something corrupt then he will do everything he can to stop her in Congress.

I don't know the validity of this source. My friend sent it to me.

observer.com...


edit on 2-11-2016 by ksiezyc because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 11:44 PM
link   
Ugh-oh, Hillary.

NOT good.

www.wral.com...



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 11:46 PM
link   

George Soros admits: "Donald Trump will win the popular vote"



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 11:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Char-Lee

That video was edited to make it appear as though Soros is saying something that he is not. It was debunked here some months ago.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 11:52 PM
link   
Might as well trigger the fireworks on the Hudson that are scheduled....




The rest of the folks will just go vote and see what happens Nov 8th



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 11:56 PM
link   
Realistically, I completely agree that a Clinton victory is - as of today at least - far and away the most probable outcome.

That said... what we have seen this election is that as the national polls tighten, the swing state polls do as well. Each still has a baked in level of propensity toward one candidate or another, but if the national polls tighten enough, it could at least give him a greater chance of a surprise victory - if Trump voters are underpolled - than most expect.

Again, I don't think it's likely. But it's not over until it's over imo. Nate Silver's model shows a probability trajectory right now of his chances rising, and hers falling, both rapidly. Just yesterday he had a less than 1 in 3 chance of winning. Today is he a slightly more than 1 in 3 chance according to their "nowcast" model. If that trend continues things could become decidedly less certain.

(Again, I am not voting for either candidate and have no horse in this race.)

Peace.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 11:58 PM
link   
a reply to: ColdWisdom

While you're right... Wikileaks did say he was threatened.

And we know how them Clintons roll.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 12:07 AM
link   
No reliable source?



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 12:08 AM
link   
I have wondered how this works..

frankly, if Clinton wins it will be chaos and the US government will lose all the credibility it has left.

with everyone coming out about Clinton this past month and what ever is left to come out, she cannot be elected.

if the college completely ignore the will of the people, when the peoples will is so clear and furious at the ''elite'' fixing it for themselves then the college will be destroyed.

the only hope the DNC has of salvaging anything is by dropping hillary and putting in Bernie.

Yes, all those wars and money and agenda and middle east conquest might fall on its face.. but atleast America would survive.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 12:29 AM
link   
a reply to: reldra

So...wow? Just wow?
You and CNN can predict the future? Quick give me the lottery numbers for the next drawing.
Have you seen the news stories for the last few days?....wait, if you were watching CNN, probably not, seeing as they have probably spent about 3 minutes total on all of Hillary's corruption and 90 hours on Trump's imagined connections to Russia.
She is going down faster than the Hindenburg, there is no way that electoral map is valid at this point.
And come Tuesday, it's going to be even less valid.




edit on 3-11-2016 by RazorV66 because: Grammar error



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 01:00 AM
link   
a reply to: reldra

It has been Calculated that If Mr. Trump Wins All the States Romney Carried in 2012 , and Wins Florida (Ahead) , North Carolina( Ahead) , and Pennsylvania( Somehow ) (Behind) , he will get to 270 Electoral Votes and be the Next President . Well in the Range of Possibility .



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 01:07 AM
link   
"The Fork of Doom has been stuck into Hillary" -Alex Jones



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 11:00 AM
link   
The reason I think Trump supporters are mostly putting up a front of confidence is because I created a thread to show your prediction of the electoral map...hardly any participation.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I think the reason is because they know it's hard for them to realistically show an electoral map that shows a Trump win. It is much easier to post thread after thread of fake Anonymous videos and speculating on an unknown FBI investigation.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 11:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: kruphix
The reason I think Trump supporters are mostly putting up a front of confidence is because I created a thread to show your prediction of the electoral map...hardly any participation.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I think the reason is because they know it's hard for them to realistically show an electoral map that shows a Trump win. It is much easier to post thread after thread of fake Anonymous videos and speculating on an unknown FBI investigation.


Whew! It was a good thing you were there to level the playing field then! Imagine what would have happened if you hadn't created a thread...there would be frontless Trump supporters running around creating all means of chaos!

unknown FBI investigations ?!?! With almost every step being played out in the World Theater thanks to comey, I'm curious which aspects of it are unknown lol



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 11:08 AM
link   
a reply to: alphabetaone




unknown FBI investigations ?!?! With almost every step being played out in the World Theater thanks to comey, I'm curious which aspects of it are unknown


How about any details of what they found on Weiner's laptop?

All we know is that emails were found that were sent/received by Huma...that's it.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 11:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: Char-Lee

That video was edited to make it appear as though Soros is saying something that he is not. It was debunked here some months ago.

Thanks good to know. Because otherwise he just told us the election is fixed.
edit on 3-11-2016 by Char-Lee because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 11:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: kruphix
a reply to: alphabetaone




unknown FBI investigations ?!?! With almost every step being played out in the World Theater thanks to comey, I'm curious which aspects of it are unknown


How about any details of what they found on Weiner's laptop?

All we know is that emails were found that were sent/received by Huma...that's it.


Well that's really all that matters. (though you left out the part about the send/receive being partially through personal email accounts ie., yahoo)....

Only those with clearance and having been trained in document handling at that level are ever supposed to be privy to the contents of certain correspondence...soooo just the fact that they were shown to have transported along unauthorized channels is really the problem in itself.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 11:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14


So I ask, how do people go for example from Sanders to Trump or a Ron Paul type, if they actually have a coherent policy view?


Anti. Establishment.
I get this concept. First of all, Trump simply is not anti establishment. He is part and parcel of it. Don't buy into it.

Second, for me anti establishment isn't enough. I agree with Sanders views on economics, not Trump. I want an actual anti war president. Trump is not that. I can't support a xenophobe or bigot regarding Muslims or immigrants.

edit on 3-11-2016 by Quetzalcoatl14 because: (no reason given)

edit on 3-11-2016 by Quetzalcoatl14 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 11:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: CriticalStinker


But Bernie represented more than my non existence loyalty to fake organizations. He represented anti establishment, and could help reduce this corrupt money based political system.


He could have helped reduce corruption.

But he lost me with Democratic Socialism, pandering to BLM, not disavowing the violence from his supporters, fake promises like free college... the list goes on.
Trumps idiotic statements are far worse.



new topics

top topics



 
16
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join