It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: StallionDuck
I know people from all parts of Austin. North, South, East and Central. I'm a member of a local women's group that has about 500 active members. I've had some conversation with about all of them over the past 6 months or so. Everyone is either voting for Clinton or one of the third party candidates.
I know 3 people who are voting for Trump, and none of them live in Austin (they live in West Texas and they are evangelicals, which happen to be the biggest supporters of Trump in Texas).
Trump has had a definite effect on a previously hard red state - and not in a way that he would like.
originally posted by: Rezlooper
originally posted by: introvert
If she wins this election I will be totally convinced that America has been hijacked by the Clinton Cabal and we are all friggin' doomed!
Because of a non-scientific poll conducted on facebook?
That makes no sense.
Scientific? This poll is much more accurate than these phony polls by the media who you have no idea who they are actually calling.
originally posted by: CrapAsUsual
originally posted by: StallionDuck
originally posted by: CrapAsUsual
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: MiloTheMarauder
I bet 100 million dollhairs that Hillary gets POTUS. Not like Facebook is any more a decent sampling size than wherever MSM gets their polls from. I don't have nor want a Facebook page.
Legitimate polling organizations poll RANDOMLY, with sample sizes that give reliable margin of error.
Facebook polls measure whoever voluntarily shows up to take the poll.
Big difference.
The are not scientific but I would expect the opposite result in a FB pool
I thought the same at first but only if FB itself was doing the poll. This is just an average guy posting to FB and one person is sharing to another and another to another until people are seeing the link all over the place. It's a downhill boulder from here. It's currently at 16.3k where just minutes ago it was barely above 15k.
That friend-to-friend link must be lost after a few thousands of votes, if the person who created the pool has only Trump supporter friends, which is unlikely after 3 or 4 "generations" of sharing the Trump proximity is lost and the sample becomes more reliable.
What I thought was that the FB public was in general younger and more pro democrats.
Its a mater of letting the pool go, if a person can only vote once this may become the most reliable pool ever done in history. How many americans have a FB account?
What is foreigners start voting? Has he limited the pool to american members?
originally posted by: CrapAsUsual
What I thought was that the FB public was in general younger and more pro democrats.
originally posted by: Greggers
When Trump loses, will you come back and acknowledge that scientifically conducted polls use reliable methodology, while Facebook polls have no statistical relevance?
originally posted by: Slanter
The problem with putting "Who are you voting for, Trump or Clinton?" in your facebook and then using that as an accurate cross-section of the population doesn't work because it's only your friends, and your friend's friends, who will see this "poll." People tend to surround themselves with similar thinking people, so it's unlikely that your facebook friends will be an accurate cross section of the population, and the friends of your friends would further reinforce this bias.
I mean comon, 90% lead over clinton? You don't think that by itself seems preposterously biased? No presidential race has even come close to that sort of disparity in the history of our nation.
originally posted by: pirhanna
originally posted by: Rezlooper
originally posted by: introvert
If she wins this election I will be totally convinced that America has been hijacked by the Clinton Cabal and we are all friggin' doomed!
Because of a non-scientific poll conducted on facebook?
That makes no sense.
Scientific? This poll is much more accurate than these phony polls by the media who you have no idea who they are actually calling.
How so? Theres a huge amount of bias worked into this guys friend list. Its the opposite of objective. This is just silly. Clinton is the last of all candidates I would select, but lets please step back into reality. This is not to say msm polls aren't sometimes purposely skewed, but goddam, if anyone thinks 90% of america is voting for trump, they are some gullible sobs.
originally posted by: StallionDuck
originally posted by: Rezlooper
originally posted by: introvert
If she wins this election I will be totally convinced that America has been hijacked by the Clinton Cabal and we are all friggin' doomed!
Because of a non-scientific poll conducted on facebook?
That makes no sense.
Scientific? This poll is much more accurate than these phony polls by the media who you have no idea who they are actually calling.
Agreed!
Damn!!! Watching these numbers gain momentum over the last 10 minutes... Right now it's like 1-2 comments per second. I'd love to see this catch on like wildfire, country wide.... Just to give people a real idea.
I currently live half of my year in the MOST LIBERAL CITY IN TEXAS and every person I've met and already know seems to be either voting for Trump or not voting at all.
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: MiloTheMarauder
I bet 100 million dollhairs that Hillary gets POTUS. Not like Facebook is any more a decent sampling size than wherever MSM gets their polls from. I don't have nor want a Facebook page.
Legitimate polling organizations poll RANDOMLY, with sample sizes that give reliable margin of error.
Facebook polls measure whoever voluntarily shows up to take the poll.
Big difference.
originally posted by: oddnutz
a reply to: MotherMayEye
The comment I linked was his post with a screenshot after the poll reached a million votes, If you scroll down his page to the 18th and find the original poll with over 1 million votes and dissect the comments. While I understand anyone can post a quick scan of the comments shows the majority of facebook accounts are females residing in the USA. Of course the accounts may not be all genuine it would still pale in comparison to the millions of fake followers you can find on Hillary Clinton's facebook and twitter accounts lol.
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: MiloTheMarauder
I bet 100 million dollhairs that Hillary gets POTUS. Not like Facebook is any more a decent sampling size than wherever MSM gets their polls from. I don't have nor want a Facebook page.
Legitimate polling organizations poll RANDOMLY, with sample sizes that give reliable margin of error.
Facebook polls measure whoever voluntarily shows up to take the poll.
Big difference.
You're right they do, but when they go out of their way to make sure they over sample people from one party or the other, do you still consider them "scientific"?
originally posted by: Nucleardoom
originally posted by: introvert
If she wins this election I will be totally convinced that America has been hijacked by the Clinton Cabal and we are all friggin' doomed!
Because of a non-scientific poll conducted on facebook?
That makes no sense.
Non-scientific poll? Is that like the MSM polls that have consistently been proven to be oversampling democrats so the polls fit their narrative?