Donald Trump Court Date Dec 16 2016 alleged 13 year old rape

originally posted by: Greggers

originally posted by: bluerabbit7788

originally posted by: Greggers

originally posted by: bluerabbit7788

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: bluerabbit7788

Yep...its a real case...been in the news since it occured(proven or not)...about this guy who owns an island where Clinton, Trump and others had occasion to "interact" with the "younger" generation who worked on it.

Problem is Trump never rode the lolita express as it came to be called in thr trial. Clinton did alot however. So Trump never went to the private island. His only interaction was a charity event or so he claims. Bur even the federal case knew he hosted many celebrates. Prince Andrew was threatened with a court case. Thr royal family told them to sod off and prove it in court. Anyone who had contact with epstien was being accused especially if they had money.

actually epstein says trump joined him with the 13 year old, and the 13 year old and 2 witnesses name trump.

Gross. Got a link, by any chance?

The fact that Trump was pal’in around with a known pedophile is a clear indication of the type of person with whom Donald Trump found he had a lot in common. The information about Epstein is documented. It is outrageous. It is horrific.

malialitman.com...

www.sott.net...

www.snopes.com...

No, I mean do you have a link proving that Epstein has claimed Trump was a participant in the rape.

gawker.com...

originally posted by: redmage
a reply to: Greggers

It was my understanding that Epstein invoked the 5th when questioned about himself being with Trump in the presence of underage females.

It was covered on the conservative site The Daily Wire.

Well, that's certainly damning (as a "No" would have been more politically advantageous for both Epstein and Trump if it were true), but it's not quite the same thing as Epstein saying, "Heck yeah, Trump helped me abuse those girls."

Thanks for clearing that up.

Not that anything would surprise me at this point.

a reply to: TownCryer

Actually, 4NOM4LY, you weren't saying it's OK to harass a woman even if she works in porn. I apologize.

gawker.com...

That's not proof that Epstein implicated Trump in any crimes.

I think Trump is a gross human being and would never vote for him, but I have to call you out on this. We have too much dishonesty on both sides right now. The thing is, in particular with Trump, there's no need to make things up.

originally posted by: bluerabbit7788
yes but trumps in the black book, as well as others, but trumps in court cuz undergirls file law suits against trump for allegedly raping them. also flight logs to orgy island epstein owned.

All of that is true, but none of that supports your claim that...

originally posted by: bluerabbit7788
actually epstein says trump joined him with the 13 year old, and the 13 year old and 2 witnesses name trump.

Epstein never said that. That's the point you're missing. He plead the 5th when asked if he was ever with Trump in the presence of underage females.

originally posted by: Greggers
Thanks for clearing that up.

Not that anything would surprise me at this point.

You're welcome, and yeah, at this point nothing would surprise me either.

Besides the obvious... the other issue that troubles me is...

Source

Papers filed in 2006 state that Epstein installed concealed cameras in numerous places in his property to record the rape of sexually trafficked minors by prominent people for criminal purposes such as blackmail.

There's already been accusations of a Bill Clinton tape.

If there's a Trump tape as well, and by some slim chance he actually does win...

This case is a non-issue for all. It is an allegation that was made, and a civil case filed, first in California and now they are attempting to file in NY for a third try.

The 'Jane Doe' was working with two men initially and it was for money. I suggest you read the following article.

www.thedailybeast.com...

They wanted to 'shop' the video. I mean, if you were coming forward after all of this time would you be looking to 'sell' a tape of you confession? By the way, not ONE news outlet picked it up.

If Trump had raped a little girl I would castrate him myself. It is sad that the hit pieces on him from the DNC were so hard as it must be frustrating to have not done something and be accused of it...especially sexual misconduct.

I still have not heard from a woman coming forward saying he did what he is being convicted of without a trial and that is "grabbing the cat'....

originally posted by: redmage

originally posted by: bluerabbit7788
yes but trumps in the black book, as well as others, but trumps in court cuz undergirls file law suits against trump for allegedly raping them. also flight logs to orgy island epstein owned.

All of that is true, but none of that supports your claim that...

originally posted by: bluerabbit7788
actually epstein says trump joined him with the 13 year old, and the 13 year old and 2 witnesses name trump.

Epstein never said that. That's the point you're missing. He plead the 5th when asked if he was ever with Trump in the presence of underage females.

www.bluedotdaily.com...

originally posted by: bluerabbit7788
www.bluedotdaily.com...

Why are you linking that to me?

No where in the article does it claim that "Epstein says trump joined him with the 13 year old", and we're all aware of the charges and court case pending.

Katie Johnson was the one who makes the claim, not Epstein himself.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
I have not seen mention of this.

Is the media staying away because of the age of the victim?

Wouldn't this be a criminal case?

Something doesn't ring true here.

It is a civil case due to the time that has passed, I believe.

originally posted by: matafuchs


If Trump had raped a little girl I would castrate him myself.

Well, kitty might have to go visit the vet.

a reply to: TownCryer

Where in the hell did I ever say its ok to sexualy assault a porn star? I NEVER said that. I just said their testimony would not be taken that seriously. Dude. Get a grip. No I dont support trump but thanks for assuming so.

Also I NEVER said these women coming forward were lying AT ALL, I just said it was coincidental.

Provding circumstance? yeah ok.Take it for what you want. I'm not here to convince anyone. I'm offering my opinion and nothing else. I'm not going to continue trying to lecture to you on my beliefs or what you think I believe is morally right or wrong.

Stop putting statements in my mouth where I didnt state them.

If I am in any way implying I said those comments then it sure is unfortunate for you to take it as that. Im not even going to bother. Im done with this thread.

Just because I suspect foul play- it makes me look like im a trump supporter. Typical.

Double post

a reply to: reldra

There are business people out there that HATE Trump. I just cannot see how all of these allegations have sat for so long and suddenly pop up. Would they not have been used for leverage prior? It is not like he is NOT in the news cycle all of the time anyway.

a reply to: matafuchs

i dunno why the republicans didnt use this for the primaries, trump wouldn't have made it out of the republican primary if this had come out. they would have had someone able to win in a winnable election.

now its just a big mess.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Search it...its on msm....and has been

originally posted by: matafuchs
I just cannot see how all of these allegations have sat for so long and suddenly pop up. Would they not have been used for leverage prior? It is not like he is NOT in the news cycle all of the time anyway.

That is what I think.
I'm no huge fan of his, but come on now....all these things would have/should have come out in the primaries.....

Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

a reply to: TheKnightofDoom

I just thought this was the election cycle where all major candidates are above the law.

a reply to: DontTreadOnMe

1st off, I support not Trump nor Clinton,

It's simple, the whole election has been a dog and pony show to get non-clinton supporters someone to root for and support and then towards the end of the election, they just have to release the flood gates of bad stuff he's done to sway those voters ( who really don't have any other choice besides throwing their vote away on a minority party if that's even there )

Why wasn't Trumps issues publicized as much as they are now before when he was a twinkle in the electing people's eye? Because we'd have someone actually president worthy that could of made it too close to control. I don't support either turd, since that's exactly what they are... You can't polish them and call em anything else.

1st, Clinton already ran last election, so she still has supporters, not to mention the media doesn't seem to want to paint her as bright colors as they do Trump, that alone is suspect.

Then the fact we even have Trump running at all, it's as if we had no better person? I highly doubt that. But Trump sure was given more media coverage than any other Rep. candidate. Which I think helped him become the nominee.

Then we have the stage of dirt being dished up and Trumps entrees are more covered than anything else.

It's almost as if we were baited with a choice but now since it's closer to the due date of elections, we're being shown all this stuff about trump that isn't new, it's all OLD but only being covered now?!?!?! Why wasn't it covered towards the beginning of his race?

Basically something doesn't add up and someone's psyops skills needs more work in the camouflage department, unless they aren't trying any longer.