It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Donald Trump Court Date Dec 16 2016 alleged 13 year old rape

page: 3
11
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 25 2016 @ 08:56 AM
link   
a reply to: 4N0M4LY

What difference does it make how long it takes a victim to come forward. Wasn't it Trump who invited 4 supposedly assaulted women from the 70's, 80's and 90's in an ill-advised attempt to paint Hillary in a negative light? It's OK for Trump to dredge up the past, but not OK for other people? Saying it's OK for a 'porn star' to be groped against her will because she's a porn star is obviously an ignorant statement. Is it OK to tackle a football player while he's at the super market because, you know, he's football player? Is it OK to rape a woman because she's wearing a short skirt? Stop making excuses for Trump's inexcusable behavior - behavior, by the way, he confirmed himself. One of the most powerful witnesses against Trump, (this whole campaign), is Donald himself. People who hate Hillary, (and there's a lot to hate, no doubt), seem willing to accept any offensive behavior by Trump simply because they don't like Hillary, which is not a good enough reason. I'm very interested in this case, and hearing directly from Trump. If that testimony is anything like his campaign and debate performances, he'll be going to jail as a sex offender.




posted on Oct, 25 2016 @ 09:10 AM
link   
Face it people, Trump admitted in his own words to groping women, therefore he must be guilty of these accusations being leveled against him by women now.

Just as Hillary, in her own words (can't we just drone him) admitted to killing people, is guilty of the 50+ murders that are associated with her over the years.

Proof or evidence are not nearly as required as
1 - accusations
2- person own words used against them

Guilt for one is guilt for both.

I am good with this, as I'd rather not see either one of them in the WH.



posted on Oct, 25 2016 @ 09:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: savemebarry

You can all deny the fact of why women do not come forward heck you are displaying the reasons right here.
You instantly dismiss them.
Let them have their day in court I'm for the truth coming out not blindly following someone because they are running against Clinton.
My logic is not clouded by politics like displayed in this thread.
But do continue your circle jerk of dismissing women sod If there is any truth in it you lot don't care.

Absolutely correct!
These old 'despicables' that are dismissing these women for any reason they can, ARE the problem, have no morals or ethics and are obviously emotionally (and perhaps mentally) stunted.
Typical Trumpets!
They don't come forward because they have to deal with these old dismissive crackers!



posted on Oct, 25 2016 @ 09:23 AM
link   
a reply to: 4N0M4LY

To be fair, just because someone is a porn star for a living doesn't mean that they don't have a right to complain about being touched without their permission.

One thing, is a job, that they give permission for, another thing, is someone coming up and touching them without permission which is assault.

Now the 20+ years waiting to come forward.... I'm not sure myself. I was raped when I was 15/16 and if he ran for presidency or anything like that.... I'm just not sure I'd even say anything. Wouldn't change anything for me, wouldn't create a magical time machine to keep it from happening 10 years ago, and I wouldn't want the attention that would come with it.

So if these women were harmed by him, then bless their courage and strength for doing so... they are stronger than me.

I mean my father is a cop and I still never did anything about it, I was scared and ashamed just wanted to forget it had happened. So maybe they were also scared and didn't say anything all those years ago, but maybe now they are like "oh hell no we can't have THIS guy running the country"

I can't speak for them and their reasons just speculate.

I can only hope that the Justice system works in this case, for those who are being honest.

-Alee
edit on 10/25/2016 by NerdGoddess because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 25 2016 @ 09:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: bluerabbit7788

Yep...its a real case...been in the news since it occured(proven or not)...about this guy who owns an island where Clinton, Trump and others had occasion to "interact" with the "younger" generation who worked on it.


Problem is Trump never rode the lolita express as it came to be called in thr trial. Clinton did alot however. So Trump never went to the private island. His only interaction was a charity event or so he claims. Bur even the federal case knew he hosted many celebrates. Prince Andrew was threatened with a court case. Thr royal family told them to sod off and prove it in court. Anyone who had contact with epstien was being accused especially if they had money.


actually epstein says trump joined him with the 13 year old, and the 13 year old and 2 witnesses name trump.



posted on Oct, 25 2016 @ 09:28 AM
link   
So now if Trump wins the election, he'll further embarrass the country by being dragged into court for raping a little girl before he's even inaugurated.

Way to go, Trump.



posted on Oct, 25 2016 @ 09:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: bluerabbit7788

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: bluerabbit7788

Yep...its a real case...been in the news since it occured(proven or not)...about this guy who owns an island where Clinton, Trump and others had occasion to "interact" with the "younger" generation who worked on it.


Problem is Trump never rode the lolita express as it came to be called in thr trial. Clinton did alot however. So Trump never went to the private island. His only interaction was a charity event or so he claims. Bur even the federal case knew he hosted many celebrates. Prince Andrew was threatened with a court case. Thr royal family told them to sod off and prove it in court. Anyone who had contact with epstien was being accused especially if they had money.


actually epstein says trump joined him with the 13 year old, and the 13 year old and 2 witnesses name trump.


Gross. Got a link, by any chance?



posted on Oct, 25 2016 @ 09:31 AM
link   
If the girl was 13 in 1994, when the alleged rape is said to have happened....she would turn 18 in 1999...and the statute of limitations in New York is 5 years after that.....so is there even a case???
www.cga.ct.gov...

4. New York—five years, but if the victim was under age 18, the statute of limitations will not start until the child has reached age 18 or the offense is reported to a law enforcement agency or central register of child abuse, whichever occurs earlier.



posted on Oct, 25 2016 @ 09:34 AM
link   
a reply to: TownCryer

I never made excuses for him. I am just giving the circumstances, sucks you dont like it. Who does? Just pointing out the obvious of what may happen.

If he is wrong then he is wrong. It is not for you or I to decide. It is up to the justice system to determine.

I dont know if he is innocent or not. Not for me to say just find it coincidental all of a sudden its convenient for these people to come forward now.



posted on Oct, 25 2016 @ 09:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe
If the girl was 13 in 1994, when the alleged rape is said to have happened....she would turn 18 in 1999...and the statute of limitations in New York is 5 years after that.....so is there even a case???
www.cga.ct.gov...

4. New York—five years, but if the victim was under age 18, the statute of limitations will not start until the child has reached age 18 or the offense is reported to a law enforcement agency or central register of child abuse, whichever occurs earlier.


Good question. This is precisely the reason Corey Feldman won't name the men who abused him and Corey Haim when they were kids. Statute of limitations has expired, so there's no criminal case, and he fears legal reprisals if he cannot present enough evidence to prove his claims.

On the other hand, perhaps a civil case could still be brought?

If Trump wins the election, expect a swift and generous settlement, whether he's guilty or not.
edit on 25-10-2016 by Greggers because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 25 2016 @ 09:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: Greggers

originally posted by: bluerabbit7788

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: bluerabbit7788

Yep...its a real case...been in the news since it occured(proven or not)...about this guy who owns an island where Clinton, Trump and others had occasion to "interact" with the "younger" generation who worked on it.


Problem is Trump never rode the lolita express as it came to be called in thr trial. Clinton did alot however. So Trump never went to the private island. His only interaction was a charity event or so he claims. Bur even the federal case knew he hosted many celebrates. Prince Andrew was threatened with a court case. Thr royal family told them to sod off and prove it in court. Anyone who had contact with epstien was being accused especially if they had money.


actually epstein says trump joined him with the 13 year old, and the 13 year old and 2 witnesses name trump.


Gross. Got a link, by any chance?


The fact that Trump was pal’in around with a known pedophile is a clear indication of the type of person with whom Donald Trump found he had a lot in common. The information about Epstein is documented. It is outrageous. It is horrific.

malialitman.com...

www.sott.net...

www.snopes.com...



posted on Oct, 25 2016 @ 09:56 AM
link   
a reply to: TheKnightofDoom

True, but time will tell when she puts out a parody with a trump look alike with her.

Whos afraid of Donald trump? Its not like hes got HRC clout



posted on Oct, 25 2016 @ 09:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: bluerabbit7788

originally posted by: Greggers

originally posted by: bluerabbit7788

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: bluerabbit7788

Yep...its a real case...been in the news since it occured(proven or not)...about this guy who owns an island where Clinton, Trump and others had occasion to "interact" with the "younger" generation who worked on it.


Problem is Trump never rode the lolita express as it came to be called in thr trial. Clinton did alot however. So Trump never went to the private island. His only interaction was a charity event or so he claims. Bur even the federal case knew he hosted many celebrates. Prince Andrew was threatened with a court case. Thr royal family told them to sod off and prove it in court. Anyone who had contact with epstien was being accused especially if they had money.


actually epstein says trump joined him with the 13 year old, and the 13 year old and 2 witnesses name trump.


Gross. Got a link, by any chance?


The fact that Trump was pal’in around with a known pedophile is a clear indication of the type of person with whom Donald Trump found he had a lot in common. The information about Epstein is documented. It is outrageous. It is horrific.

malialitman.com...

www.sott.net...

www.snopes.com...


No, I mean do you have a link proving that Epstein has claimed Trump was a participant in the rape.



posted on Oct, 25 2016 @ 10:04 AM
link   
a reply to: Greggers




This is precisely the reason Corey Feldman won't name the men who abused him and Corey Haim when they were kids. Statute of limitations has expired, so there's no criminal case, and he fears legal reprisals if he cannot present enough evidence to prove his claims.


That is completely out of order.

Here in The U.K. there is no " Statute Of Limitations " for sexual offences.



posted on Oct, 25 2016 @ 10:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: 4N0M4LY
a reply to: bluerabbit7788


Again they waited 20+ Years to come forward now? All of a sudden it is urgent their voices be heard? Or is it because Trump is running for office at this very moment.

He wont be in December. he will be just another citizen schlub..condemned by most of the right for losing the election and effecting the down ticket



Certainly doesn't add up. In addition to a porn star trying to blame trump for being assulted. Really? A porn star who wants to complain about being groped. LOL. That's even funnier than the last woman who came forward.

Actually, the porn star you are discussing isn't "blaming" Trump for assault, she is (quite humorously) relaying a story of him begging her for sex, offering 10k for sex, etc. She did say how he hugged and kissed without permission (I bet he just ate some tic tacs) but she doesn't seem to be moaning about that too much.
the Don is trying to silence her, threatening legal action. her response is bring it on. he said he never met her, she has photos of him and her together.

Your man is a scumbag

Lets see how his court case goes in december. I imagine the last few vestages of trump fans will demand the 13 year old wanted it.



posted on Oct, 25 2016 @ 10:21 AM
link   
a reply to: Greggers

It was my understanding that Epstein invoked the 5th when questioned about himself being with Trump in the presence of underage females.

It was covered on the conservative site The Daily Wire.



posted on Oct, 25 2016 @ 10:32 AM
link   
a reply to: Greggers

I don't think any of us have to worry about Trump winning the election.



posted on Oct, 25 2016 @ 10:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: Greggers

originally posted by: bluerabbit7788

originally posted by: Greggers

originally posted by: bluerabbit7788

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: bluerabbit7788

Yep...its a real case...been in the news since it occured(proven or not)...about this guy who owns an island where Clinton, Trump and others had occasion to "interact" with the "younger" generation who worked on it.


Problem is Trump never rode the lolita express as it came to be called in thr trial. Clinton did alot however. So Trump never went to the private island. His only interaction was a charity event or so he claims. Bur even the federal case knew he hosted many celebrates. Prince Andrew was threatened with a court case. Thr royal family told them to sod off and prove it in court. Anyone who had contact with epstien was being accused especially if they had money.


actually epstein says trump joined him with the 13 year old, and the 13 year old and 2 witnesses name trump.


Gross. Got a link, by any chance?


The fact that Trump was pal’in around with a known pedophile is a clear indication of the type of person with whom Donald Trump found he had a lot in common. The information about Epstein is documented. It is outrageous. It is horrific.

malialitman.com...

www.sott.net...

www.snopes.com...


No, I mean do you have a link proving that Epstein has claimed Trump was a participant in the rape.


he is in epsteins black book. also accused of rape in the trial coming up in december with underaged girls.



posted on Oct, 25 2016 @ 10:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: redmage
a reply to: Greggers

It was my understanding that Epstein invoked the 5th when questioned about himself being with Trump in the presence of underage females.

It was covered on the conservative site The Daily Wire.


yes but trumps in the black book, as well as others, but trumps in court cuz undergirls file law suits against trump for allegedly raping them. also flight logs to orgy island epstein owned.



posted on Oct, 25 2016 @ 10:50 AM
link   
a reply to: 4N0M4LY

No, you are not simply providing circumstance. You're implying that these women who are coming forward are lying, or only doing so now because of publicity, or because their attacker is running for President. You're also asserting that a it's OK to assault a woman because of her job, which is wrong, even if that woman is a 'porn star'. It's not that I don't like what you're saying as much as I can recognize it as ignorant, (not stupid), and in-line with other Trump apologists. However, if it makes you feel any better, if you don't like what I'M saying, I'm sorry too.



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join