It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

WTF Do These Wikileaks Numbers Mean?---BREAKING

page: 6
174
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 06:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: goou111

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Hazardous1408

How it's done is a timer.

At a certain time like ever day a reset.

Rinse and repeat.

Not complicated at all.


So if he is alive he resets the timer?
That makes sense.

Thing is you cannot pre plan a tweet for a specific time.

So we're back to "How"?


How about Assange set them in motion right before he died? Like he saw it coming and last second push of the button.


Then why didn't all 3 tweets come in at the same time???

You guys are treading beyond conspiratorial into the nut job.




posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 06:53 PM
link   
a reply to: JacKatMtn

Totally offtopic, but I just want to say Old Boris looks totally unpresentable even in an official photograph for office.




posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 06:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: eisegesis
This was also released today,

Syrian rebels seize 'doomsday' village where Islamic State promised final battle


BEIRUT (Reuters) - Syrian rebels said they captured the village of Dabiq from Islamic State on Sunday, forcing the jihadist group from a stronghold where it had promised to fight a final, apocalyptic battle with the West.

An Islamic prophecy names Dabiq as the site of a battle between Muslims and infidels that will presage doomsday, a message Islamic State used extensively in its propaganda, going so far as to name its main publication after the village.

www.yahoo.com...
Could be nothing, but still interesting nonetheless!!



So does that mean now a bunch of Christians are going to set up shop at Megido now?
Bizarre days....


+10 more 
posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 06:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: goou111

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Hazardous1408

How it's done is a timer.

At a certain time like ever day a reset.

Rinse and repeat.

Not complicated at all.


So if he is alive he resets the timer?
That makes sense.

Thing is you cannot pre plan a tweet for a specific time.

So we're back to "How"?


How about Assange set them in motion right before he died? Like he saw it coming and last second push of the button.


Then why didn't all 3 tweets come in at the same time???

You guys are treading beyond conspiratorial into the nut job.


Well, it could be as simple as a key person that gets contacted by him at specified intervals and if he doesn't check in...then a plan is put into motion assuming he is dead.

Jeez...there are probably a few ways to put such a plan in motion.


edit on 16-10-2016 by MotherMayEye because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 06:55 PM
link   
a reply to: Hazardous1408

Actually it does.

If a person ever watched this movie.



A psychological thriller; Mace Sowell, an ex-intelligence operative and whose past government activities catches up with him, faces his own mortality, in the shape of the onset of Alzheimer's disease. Holding the electronic key to secret information which implicates a Presidential front-runner, Mace struggles for his life while battling the debilitating effects of the disease.


www.imdb.com...




posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 06:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: goou111

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Hazardous1408

How it's done is a timer.

At a certain time like ever day a reset.

Rinse and repeat.

Not complicated at all.


So if he is alive he resets the timer?
That makes sense.

Thing is you cannot pre plan a tweet for a specific time.

So we're back to "How"?


How about Assange set them in motion right before he died? Like he saw it coming and last second push of the button.


Then why didn't all 3 tweets come in at the same time???

You guys are treading beyond conspiratorial into the nut job.


Just going a little "old school" ATS.



posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 06:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Hazardous1408

How it's done is a timer.

At a certain time like ever day a reset.

Rinse and repeat.

Not complicated at all.


So if he is alive he resets the timer?
That makes sense.

Thing is you cannot pre plan a tweet for a specific time.

So we're back to "How"?


Well, it could be as simple as a key person that gets contacted by him at specified intervals and if he doesn't check in...then a plan is put into motion assuming he is dead.

Jeez...there are probably a few ways to put such a plan in motion.


I'm just asking.
Calm down dear.

Thanks that makes perfect sense by the way.

No action on the timer, sets on a signal to a third party, viola.

Now it's fitting together.

Still no idea why the tweets are all separate if it's a DMS dump.

Are we to believe these 3 dumps are all he had left?



posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 06:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
If it was a dead mans switch who is tweeting???

Such a dead man's switch would be scripted to send out the tweet(s) automatically; Nobody would have to be doing it. I don't think that's what's happening, though.


I don't think he's dead either, but I do think these tweets were a message if nothing else.

Here's the Snowden tweet that was similar:


The "It's Time," tweet was the a couple of dayS before if what I'm seeing is correct.

So, these are likely keys to unlock files yet to be released to my thinking considering the "pre-commitment," wording in each tweet.
edit on 16-10-2016 by jadedANDcynical because: clarified timing of tweet



posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 06:57 PM
link   


it could e as simple as a key person that gets contacted by him


I had thought that it might be a better plan. If his information systems infrastructure was known, it might be able to be stopped or compromised. A couple a very trusted friends.



posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 06:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
Calm down dear.




Oh. No. You. Din't.



posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 06:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
If it was a dead mans switch who is tweeting???

Such a dead man's switch would be scripted to send out the tweet(s) automatically; Nobody would have to be doing it. I don't think that's what's happening, though.


How is that done then?

Enlighten me because unless his twitter account is hooked to his dying heart that's an impossibility.



I don't think Assange is dead, BUT...

Perhaps such a script exists so that if Assange does not log in or check in at certain intervals, the script will send out automatic messages.

Have no idea if such a thing is possible but if I knew how to write scripts for such an need, this is how I might approach it.

Bingo.


+14 more 
posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 07:00 PM
link   
Kerry was the informant all along
>Assange received a tip that Kerry’s been outted
>All communications compromised
>Tweets an encrypted message for him
>”Cover blown, initiate safehouse protocol, they are coming for you”

^^^ 4chan's theory

edit on 16102016 by DodgyDawg because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 07:03 PM
link   
a reply to: DodgyDawg

Honestly, that's just too much to hope for. If someone as high level as Kerry was involved, then why the hell are we having this parallel universe election?



posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 07:04 PM
link   
I cannot help but believe these wiki leaks posts are simply to compare and legitimize future releases. It will ensure that the release is legitimate and not a hacked version. You just compare this key to the encrypted file hex to ensure it has not been tampered with. Why? Why not. Especially if you want to make sure that someone who doesn't like you , who would want to corrupt your reputation, can't do it via hacking.

I expect he is alive and well and in a day will upload these three files.
edit on 10 16 2016 by CynConcepts because: (no reason given)


Edit add: everyone must have missed this post from page 1 -

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: IAMTAT

I just saw these and was about to post a thread.

They look like some kind of hash code.

Hopefully someone a bit more technically savvy will come along an interpret.

 


From Reddit:


This is a 256 bit hex hash key.

It is likely the generated hash for a file/archive download. Basically, if you download it from the correct source and run a sha-256 sum on the archive, such as a zip...it would match that 64 bit key EXACTLY. If someone changed even 1 character in the zip, (like a bad individual)..the 64 bit hash would be 100% different.

edit on 10 16 2016 by CynConcepts because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 07:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: goou111

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Hazardous1408

How it's done is a timer.

At a certain time like ever day a reset.

Rinse and repeat.

Not complicated at all.


So if he is alive he resets the timer?
That makes sense.

Thing is you cannot pre plan a tweet for a specific time.

So we're back to "How"?


How about Assange set them in motion right before he died? Like he saw it coming and last second push of the button.


Then why didn't all 3 tweets come in at the same time???

You guys are treading beyond conspiratorial into the nut job.


Actually there is a program called if then then that or
IFTTT for short where you could pull off tweeting out a message if im not mistaken. The program automates processes once something is triggered. Say for instance I have IFTTT on my phone and i have a smart house, i can set the phone to turn on the lights in the house and turn on the air conditioner once my phone connects to the wifi in my house. I thought i saw that the program can use social programs like facebook and other things.



posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 07:06 PM
link   
Well he replied to some guy on twitter

So i assume he's not dead.

Still hoping this is related to something massive and oligarchy-destroying.



posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 07:06 PM
link   
Looks like "hash 160"
Should be obvious



posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 07:07 PM
link   
Right we know this concerns encrypted messages and also John Kerry, Ecuador and the United Kingdom Foreign and Commonwealth office.

The 4chan theory that Kerry is an informant and that he is yet to commit to asylum fits all information we have at least.

It could also be possible that Julian Assange is planning to get to Ecuador Using Kerry and the FCO in some way.

All three posted at once suggests importance of them being together in a plan overall.



posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 07:07 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

heres another :

tae5c9b064aw646ba478f080ahc35b56ae5cfe35-b93b1780cf1b92a48f9kl56


i just made it up -


thats how much the mean unless a useable solution is published

will then its just some alpha-numeric string



posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 07:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: DodgyDawg
Kerry was the informant all along
>Assange received a tip that Kerry’s been outted
>All communications compromised
>Tweets an encrypted message for him
>”Cover blown, initiate safehouse protocol, they are coming for you”

^^^ 4chan's theory


Well, now I can't stop picturing John Kerry on the run, pulling some Jason Bourne moves, killing men with copies of Better Homes and Gardens.
edit on 10/16/2016 by eNumbra because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
174
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join