It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Clinton on Assange - "Can't we just DRONE this guy?"

page: 2
78
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 09:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: intrptr

Not to mention the fallout from blowing up an embassy and anyone else inside it. But who cares about that, right?


Clinton's comment was alleged to have been made when Assange was still a free man. It is nonetheless despicable however, especially with the further comments about how he is always travelling and is a soft target... These extrapolations of the original 'joke' point to something deeper and more serious, in my opinion.
edit on 3-10-2016 by daaskapital because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 09:32 AM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

A viable option meaning she was told if they drone him she can guarantee whatever dirt he has on everyome will be released?



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 09:33 AM
link   
a reply to: Hazardous1408

With it being an embassy it's technically Ecuador they'd be droning



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 09:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: intrptr

Not to mention the fallout from blowing up an embassy and anyone else inside it. But who cares about that, right?


Hillary's track record on Embassy safety is below standard.



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 09:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: Discotech
a reply to: Hazardous1408

With it being an embassy it's technically Ecuador they'd be droning


Technically, but not realistically.

They wouldn't even fly a drone over London in a threatening manner, let alone into it.


& she didn't say to drone the embassy, she said he often walks around without a care.
If we are to believe the source.



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 09:40 AM
link   
If it was Trump who would silence Assange he would have said, "can't we just nuke this guy"...
edit on 3-10-2016 by Mianeye because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 09:45 AM
link   
a reply to: ghostrager

All part of the charade, perfectly scripted - "never mind over there look at this instead"

How long will it take for people to realize that he's part of the show?

For goodness sakes stop letting them play you.

At this point there is no doubt in my mind (therefore my opinion) that he's definitely controlled opposition, just another red herring to keep us distracted from the real culprits.


edit on 3-10-2016 by DigitalVigilante420 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 09:52 AM
link   
A drone strike on a Ecuadorian embasy on UK sovereign soil.........


Yeah *clap* *clap* way to lose freinds and alienate people.


The USA has few loyal freinds as it is. Stupid idea to ask for a drone strike on london.....



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 10:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr

originally posted by: IAMTAT
"Can't we just drone the guy?"...She was most-likely serious....We all have seen Hillary Clinton doesn't have a sense of humor unless someone writes it for her.

The reason they haven't done it up to now, they don't want to martyr the guy.
You also can't just drone an embassy in England, even if they wanted to.


+8 more 
posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 10:07 AM
link   
a reply to: crazyewok


As the article said, Julian Assange wasn't in-hiding back when Hillary was Secty of State. She said he was a very "soft target" that could be taken out easily. Hillary also wants to kill the Breitbart people, once she's back in charge of a few weapons.

As I said last night in other thread about her compulsion to Drone-kill, Hillary has no conscience. Zero. None. ZIP. She could kill any human walking the planet (except Chelsea) and sleep like a baby that night.


edit on 10/3/2016 by carewemust because: Anybody But Hillary!



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 10:09 AM
link   
IMO, the thread is more about how the current established 'leaders' and their family of corrupt politicians and lawyers think than her how the clintons plan to deal with this guy right now.

Nobody is talking about hitting the guy now- he'd be a martyr. She was talking about having him offed back when he was out and about still.

Now that everyone knows him, they have to discredit him first, then quietly suicide him out after he's not considered a source for leaks anymore. Basically, they didn't execute their enemy when it was convenient, and now you can imagine they have regrets. Just imagine how that will impact their decisions going forward.

I'd say they're doing a pretty good job so far on the discredit front- I almost wonder if all of these promised leaks are related to information promised to him by, say, the CIA with some undercover mole. Then they simply never deliver, so he can't deliver- and we're left thinking less of what he's trying to accomplish. Once he fades out of the limelight and no longer considered important, expect to see him "commit suicide". The autopsy that determines the cause of death will likely be performed by someone connected to good old slick willy.



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 10:14 AM
link   
And Assange's 'dead man switch' being activated, is another deterrent. Could be a bluff, but I think not.



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 10:14 AM
link   
[Hillary thinking to herself...]

Hindsight is always 20/20

If only we had.
If only we had.
If only we had.




posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 10:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
[Hillary thinking to herself...]

Hindsight is always 20/20

If only we had.
If only we had.
If only we had.





That's what Bill Clinton thinks to this very day, due to deciding not to DRONE Osama Bin Laden back in the late 1990's. Could be why Hillary has drone-on-the-brain now.
edit on 10/3/2016 by carewemust because: Hillary's a Drone Freak.


+4 more 
posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 10:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: xuenchen
[Hillary thinking to herself...]

Hindsight is always 20/20

If only we had.
If only we had.
If only we had.





That's what Bill Clinton thinks to this very day about him deciding not to DRONE Osama Bin Laden back in the late 1990's. Could be why Hillary has drone-on-the-brain now.


Makes sense...Hillary IS a Drone.
She's remotely-controlled by George Soros, Big Banks...and M.E. donor countries.


+6 more 
posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 10:34 AM
link   
You know what people say about a "scorned woman", right?

If Billary isn't the textbook example of a scorned woman, I don't know what is!!

...and to think some people would elect her to be president???? HOLY CRAP!!

Just think....

"I can't believe that damn Hillary just....(BOOM!!!) (drone attack)

"In other news today, the entire US economy just TANKED all because Hillary...(BOOOM!!) (drone attack)

"Let's tune in live to hear what the president of the NRA has to say..."Well, I'd just like to say...(BOOM!) (drone attack)

"Federal investigators investigating the Clinton Foundation today revealed... (BOOM! BOOM!! BOOM!!!) (drone attack)

"The Senate Banking Committee today revealed the results of a three year long investigation into... (BOOM!) (drone attack)

"We're reporting live from our underground concrete and steel bunker located one mile below Mt. Rushmore. The jobless numbers for 2017 were just released and...(BOOM!!) (JDAM Bunker Buster...followed by drone attack!)


"We interrupt this regularly scheduled program to bring you the following important public service announcement....all regularly scheduled programming will be suspended immediately and until further notice. All regularly scheduled programming has been replaced with Hillary Clinton infomercials interspersed with syndicated reruns of the beloved Barney & Friends (not to be confused with "Bernie" & Friends, because he's DEAD). Programming will start in 5, 4, 3, 2...."


edit on 10/3/2016 by Flyingclaydisk because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 10:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: daaskapital

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: intrptr

Not to mention the fallout from blowing up an embassy and anyone else inside it. But who cares about that, right?


Clinton's comment was alleged to have been made when Assange was still a free man. It is nonetheless despicable however, especially with the further comments about how he is always travelling and is a soft target... These extrapolations of the original 'joke' point to something deeper and more serious, in my opinion.


The key word there is 'alleged'.



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 10:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: Snarl

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
You guys honestly think the US would drone London?

It could be done ... and they could probably get away with it too.

Problem is, once you start doing that, the folks that are in-the-know want to start playing by those rules too.


Unless the RAF was in on it and agreed the UK would shoot your dam drone out the sky.

We are not some defenceless 3rd world nation.
edit on 3-10-2016 by crazyewok because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 10:42 AM
link   
a reply to: uncommitted


These days, everything is "alleged" if it's not in writing, or recorded. Even then, the doubters say that it's forged, or manipulated.



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 10:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: intrptr

Not to mention the fallout from blowing up an embassy and anyone else inside it. But who cares about that, right?

They do that all the time, just not in the West.

Not one single drone strike anywhere in the West.

As far as you know, there hasn't been one.

Someone that is a target is in a house in a suburb of Chicago, Illinois.

Drone strike hits the house.

Official investigation finds that it was due to a gas leak.

Impossible?



new topics

top topics



 
78
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join