It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ParasuvO
a reply to: TerryDon79
The fact you and others actually believe the 2 can be separated is quite a leap.
Good luck with that.
originally posted by: neoholographic
originally posted by: ParasuvO
a reply to: TerryDon79
The fact you and others actually believe the 2 can be separated is quite a leap.
Good luck with that.
EXACTLY!!
He just said you MUST have life in order to have evolution. You can't separate the two!
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TerryDon79
Of course it does.
God did it.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: neoholographic
So? What's your point?
The theory of evolution doesn't cover how life came to be and the origins of life doesn't cover how life changes.
It's the Origins that dictate how this change can occur. Your own statement destroys your argument!
Darwinists is used a derogatory term for people who understand the evolutionary theory. But you keep throwing it around, it helps you look clever lol.
originally posted by: neoholographic
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: neoholographic
So? What's your point?
The theory of evolution doesn't cover how life came to be and the origins of life doesn't cover how life changes.
Darwinist have really turned evolution into a religion.
Can you not read? Let's try again.
Of course the origins of life covers how life changes because according to you, EVOLUTION MUST have life.
Nice strawman.
That's like saying, Toyota cars needs a blueprint to be built but we don't need the blueprint in order to know how different Toyota's change over time.
Actually, no. Origins just covers how LIFE STARTED. Nothing more.
It's the Origins that dictate how this change can occur. Your own statement destroys your argument!
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: neoholographic
So now you're making up your own theory of evolution?
Get back to me once it's tested an peer reviewed. Until then, origins of life doesn't explain evolution and evolution doesn't explain the origins of life.
originally posted by: Orionx2
What was the very first thing that existed and how? How did the first atom come into existence? How did nothing become something?
Evolution is about how life changed.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: neoholographic
Yes, evolution needs life. I thought that was a no brainer. Obviously not as it needed explaining to you.
But guess what? Evolution DOESN'T explain the origins of life and the origins of life DOESN'T explain evolution.
How does a chocolate cake change over time? Do I have to know the recipe in order to eat the cake?
If I have a recipe to make chocolate cake, how can I explain how that chocolate cake changed overtime without the Origins or Recipe?