It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Motherlode: Clinton Foundation Hacked?

page: 3
83
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 17 2016 @ 09:57 PM
link   
It really amazes me how MANY on ATS rant about personal privacy, electronic invasion, cameras in public areas, etc.

But, when it targets someone in a political position - - - they salivate at the disclosure.

Two wrongs?

I find it incredibly hypocritical.





edit on 17-8-2016 by Annee because: (no reason given)



+13 more 
posted on Aug, 17 2016 @ 10:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Their use of our tax dollars to conduct business negates that entirely. Or would you rather they have the monopolies on force and privacy?

Go back to bashing Trump. It's far more fruitful than defending Hillary.
edit on 17-8-2016 by Bobaganoosh because: (no reason given)


+6 more 
posted on Aug, 17 2016 @ 10:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee
It really amazes me how MANY on ATS rant about personal privacy, electronic invasion, cameras in public areas, etc.

But, when it targets someone in a political position - - - they salivate at the disclosure.

Two wrongs?

I find it incredibly hypocritical.



Scared your corrupt candidates might have more bad news coming?


+2 more 
posted on Aug, 17 2016 @ 10:03 PM
link   
Politicians are public servants. Private citizens are entitled to privacies that public officials forego.
Goes with the territory when one chooses a career in politics.
a reply to: Annee


edit on 17-8-2016 by Elostone because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 17 2016 @ 10:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Throes

originally posted by: Annee
It really amazes me how MANY on ATS rant about personal privacy, electronic invasion, cameras in public areas, etc.

But, when it targets someone in a political position - - - they salivate at the disclosure.

Two wrongs?

I find it incredibly hypocritical.



Scared your corrupt candidates might have more bad news coming?


No, not at all.

I just find it extremely hypocritical.


+6 more 
posted on Aug, 17 2016 @ 10:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Yes Annee and yet they exist, even now.

Heaven forbid they are used in favor of the public?


+5 more 
posted on Aug, 17 2016 @ 10:05 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

Snowdens 'It's time' Twitter comment a few weeks ago is now starting to bear fruit it seems.

All good things will come to those who wait, maybe they gave the CF the opportunity to come forward first before they unleash the contents of the hack for the public to dissect and consume prior to November 8th.

'If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear' - LOL.



posted on Aug, 17 2016 @ 10:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Elostone
Politicians are public servants. Private citizens are entitled to pro acids that public officials forego.
Goes with the territory when one chooses a career in politics.
a reply to: Annee



The extent of the invasion is way beyond what I find acceptable.

I expect every excuse under the sun.



posted on Aug, 17 2016 @ 10:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

Yes Annee and yet they exist, even now.

Heaven forbid they are used in favor of the public?



Ever been in a group where the leadership quits/leaves - - - and the whole thing completely falls apart?

I know its Shocking - - - but, leadership is a requirement.


+5 more 
posted on Aug, 17 2016 @ 10:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

I dont care Clinton's Facebook or personal texts or internet use.
I care about her dodgy foundation taking bribes and donations from foreign governments that influence her decisions in her official capacity for the US government.

that should be public.. 100% transparent.. and it should be well before she cleans/deletes/removes anything.



posted on Aug, 17 2016 @ 10:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

I'm counting on it to happen exactly that way!




posted on Aug, 17 2016 @ 10:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Elostone
Politicians are public servants. Private citizens are entitled to pro acids that public officials forego.
Goes with the territory when one chooses a career in politics.
a reply to: Annee



The extent of the invasion is way beyond what I find acceptable.

Then don't run for political office.



posted on Aug, 17 2016 @ 10:13 PM
link   
a reply to: ghostrager


Well, it's about time we see a RECENT ASSANGE interview and disclosure. The media and ATS kept regurgitating his June 17th interview as if it was fresh. The BUZZFEED interview you linked to really is fresh, GhostRager. And encouraging! Thank-you.



posted on Aug, 17 2016 @ 10:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Throes

originally posted by: Annee
It really amazes me how MANY on ATS rant about personal privacy, electronic invasion, cameras in public areas, etc.

But, when it targets someone in a political position - - - they salivate at the disclosure.

Two wrongs?

I find it incredibly hypocritical.



Scared your corrupt candidates might have more bad news coming?


No, not at all.

I just find it extremely hypocritical.


Well you should be scared. It's time.



posted on Aug, 17 2016 @ 10:21 PM
link   
Wasn't Bryan Pagliano working for the Clinton foundation and running Hillary's private server through the Clinton Foundation for a few months just after Hillary became SOS?


+5 more 
posted on Aug, 17 2016 @ 10:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Government serves us.

They are public servants.

They are not our masters.

If they are doing unethical things, then I want to know.



posted on Aug, 17 2016 @ 10:23 PM
link   
Could be possible that Hillary is really ill and just doesn't care. But, fore the rest of them.....



posted on Aug, 17 2016 @ 10:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Throes

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Throes

originally posted by: Annee
It really amazes me how MANY on ATS rant about personal privacy, electronic invasion, cameras in public areas, etc.

But, when it targets someone in a political position - - - they salivate at the disclosure.

Two wrongs?

I find it incredibly hypocritical.



Scared your corrupt candidates might have more bad news coming?


No, not at all.

I just find it extremely hypocritical.


Well you should be scared. It's time.


Why waste energy on speculation?



posted on Aug, 17 2016 @ 10:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Elostone

or if people start killing them instead of innocent civilians just to get on the news.

Things are going to get real. There is only one logical outcome to all this.

I will not be shocked. I will be dissapointed that with all the smart people in our country and everyone is caught up in denial over the actual hold of the illusion of power and control.

There are no ivory towers. Thats just a saying. There are no forts, only the armed forces have those.

There will be blood. History would teach us better, but we keep rewriting it in the hopes that somehow that will change the future....while never correcting our errors.

It wont be a revolt, an uprising, a backlash, or a state of upheaval. It will be a culture of revenge.

No end for that beyond what is percieved as righteous annihilation.

Sad is not the word.

edit on 8 17 2016 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 17 2016 @ 10:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Speculation? This is observation.

Speculation happens when conclusions are drawn from an initial event.

Here we have an historic and blatant disregard for the sensitive details of the workings of this country, in the hands of a mentally ill woman.

Her failure is quite indicative of what her leadership would entail.

Denial of this trend, current news aside, is either blind fanaticism or compensated denial on your part.

Same goes for the rest of her defense team here.







 
83
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join