Creation v Evolution argument can end

originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: Raggedyman

That is the difference people actually kill in the name of religion.
Oh and cheers for the admission dude next time you post crap I will point it out and point out your post admitting trolling.

People actually killed in the name of Darwinism, useless eaters, sub humans, less evolved, hitler used Darwinism to kill the Jews
Darwinism was used by Stalin to slaughter millions, you have a long list of atheists to live up to.

You are in a thread about empirical evidence complaining about some thing irrelevant and label me the troll

Dismissed

Want me to point out something dude

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Akragon

We just saw evidence a page ago that people are de evolving and you are saying they are evolving
Who do I believe

And yet again you highlight how little you actually know about evolution.

Evolution doesn't have a direction. "Devolution" makes no sense in modern evolutionary synthesis.

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Akragon

We just saw evidence a page ago that people are de evolving and you are saying they are evolving
Who do I believe

oh dear... lol

we as a species are evolving in time...

That does not mean that we as a species are getting smarter...

We have brilliant people that change our technology... but we seem to be leaning towards an anti social society, and we are naturally a socially species, as are most...

De-evolution only exists in theology... as punishment only...

Hell.... Right?

originally posted by: logicsoda

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: TerryDon79

As predictable as always.

and I can pen this whole thread and get nothing from every atheist evolutionist here
Because
As predictable as always

Apart from the fact that not all people who stand by the theory of evolution are atheists.

Another fact that you keep ignoring.

But you carry on. People like you are ten reason that religion has lost its footing over the years.

Aye. I think it's about time people just stopped responding to him. It seems to me like he's just trolling, so we should stop feeding the troll.

I thought trolls were people who do what you are doing in the thread I created

But who knows how some people think

originally posted by: Akragon

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Akragon

We just saw evidence a page ago that people are de evolving and you are saying they are evolving
Who do I believe

oh dear... lol

we as a species are evolving in time...

That does not mean that we as a species are getting smarter...

We have brilliant people that change our technology... but we seem to be leaning towards an anti social society, and we are naturally a socially species, as are most...

De-evolution only exists in theology... as punishment only...

Hell.... Right?

OH DEAR, LOL

Clearly you didn't read the report
Come on Ak, you are telling everyone how good you are and fail off
the launch pad

Crikey!
GO Read the report

You are embarrassing yourself

originally posted by: pthena
a reply to: Raggedyman

What would you like me to tackle first, explain why they are assumptions and not empirical.

1) I looked up the first one. They call it universal, yet the exceptions prove the rule. What? An assumption.
2) Doesn't sound true. There have been cataclysms that have almost eliminated life, which pretty much then had to start over almost from scratch. No way could there be a smooth transition from oldest rocks to newer rocks. Assumption
3) Hypothesized evolutionary relationships between humans and their close relatives based on DNA-DNA hybridization data. Hypothesis.

Sory, not sure I understand your direction
Cheers

a reply to: Raggedyman

Clearly you didn't read the report
Come on Ak, you are telling everyone how good you are and fail off
the launch pad

Crikey!
GO Read the report

You are embarrassing yourself

how good i am... as i crack my 7th beer... lol

its your thread brother... why are you making it about me?

I want to see empirical evidence of devolution in humans.
We will evolve slower than any other organism because evolution adapts to its environment. Where we create environment to suit us.

originally posted by: blackcrowe
I want to see empirical evidence of devolution in humans.
We will evolve slower than any other organism because evolution adapts to its environment. Where we create environment to suit us.

Two pages ago we saw some amazing evidence, it's not empirical, it can't be, we havnt been able to test, repeat and observe
I am not selling it, I am questioning it, keep up

Irrespective of us, other animals should, in reality. Ats and dogs should be evolving into humans as we speak, adapting to our environment
Your argument is silly

originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: Raggedyman

Clearly you didn't read the report
Come on Ak, you are telling everyone how good you are and fail off
the launch pad

Crikey!
GO Read the report

You are embarrassing yourself

how good i am... as i crack my 7th beer... lol

its your thread brother... why are you making it about me?

It's OK ak
No repercussions poking the beast, go for number 8

Now remember I said bone structure and you said I stated skeletal, that's just blatant dishonesty, blatant lie, and you didn't have the courage to own up to it

It's not about you, it's about the lie

No. Dogs can't turn into humans.
Your comment is ridiculous.

a reply to: blackcrowe



Yet dirt and water can turn into humans, by faith I guess

a reply to: Raggedyman

You know your deliberately taking the subject out of context.
I think your having a good laugh at it all.
That's fine by me.
Enjoy your day.

a reply to: Raggedyman

what lie?

i actually posted the wrong video on the first page...

Here ya go bud...

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: Barcs

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: Barcs

originally posted by: Raggedyman
I am interested in empirical evidence, thanks for trying

Happy Birthday! Thousands of scientific research papers on Evolutionary evidence

Be sure to let us know which are not accurate.

Yet not one with empirical evidence, if there was you would show me that one
Not try and deflect with thousands that you know I wont bother reading

Just one, one piece of empirical evidence, not assumption, not random chance, come on

Let's be real. You won't bother reading if I post ONE.

Click on the first paper on the list. Each one cites empirical testable evidence. Evolution is not as simple as "X evolves into Y". You can't completely explain it in a single page or even single book. If you truly are interested in evidence, you are going to need to do some heavy reading. Animals don't change into other animals. They slightly change, then slightly change again, then slightly change again, then slightly change again, and so on for millions of generations.

Let's be real. You won't bother posting one because I will shred it

You have nothing so say thousands

Start a thread, a whole thread of empirical evidence, one at a time

Show your courage, your faith in science

Dont deflect attack the bible, attack me, attack

Stand on science, dont hide amongst a thousand , put one up

Its a challenge, this whole thread is a challenge

You are to scared, go get it and let the science talk, your talk is empty, always was always is

Are you really ready for that???? Ok, I accept the challenge. I'll start posting papers - the complete papers - and you tell us why the paper doesn't meet the standard of empirical evidence. Agreed?

a reply to: TerryDon79

I reckon he wipes his elbow after going to the bathroom too.

Is that a survival trait; or unnatural selection?

a reply to: Raggedyman

Yet dirt and water can turn into humans, by faith I guess

I dont exactly see god repeating "a human out of a rib trick" either. What a waste of electrons these threads are.

Is your faith in your god that weak that you wont allow your god to speak to peoples hearts "in their own time"? You really should stop driving whilst your at it. Because god didnt refine the oil or build the engine. I could go on, but like others have said your threads are pointless and lack any substance.

originally posted by: Phantom423

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: Barcs

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: Barcs

originally posted by: Raggedyman
I am interested in empirical evidence, thanks for trying

Happy Birthday! Thousands of scientific research papers on Evolutionary evidence

Be sure to let us know which are not accurate.

Yet not one with empirical evidence, if there was you would show me that one
Not try and deflect with thousands that you know I wont bother reading

Just one, one piece of empirical evidence, not assumption, not random chance, come on

Let's be real. You won't bother reading if I post ONE.

Click on the first paper on the list. Each one cites empirical testable evidence. Evolution is not as simple as "X evolves into Y". You can't completely explain it in a single page or even single book. If you truly are interested in evidence, you are going to need to do some heavy reading. Animals don't change into other animals. They slightly change, then slightly change again, then slightly change again, then slightly change again, and so on for millions of generations.

Let's be real. You won't bother posting one because I will shred it

You have nothing so say thousands

Start a thread, a whole thread of empirical evidence, one at a time

Show your courage, your faith in science

Dont deflect attack the bible, attack me, attack

Stand on science, dont hide amongst a thousand , put one up

Its a challenge, this whole thread is a challenge

You are to scared, go get it and let the science talk, your talk is empty, always was always is

Are you really ready for that???? Ok, I accept the challenge. I'll start posting papers - the complete papers - and you tell us why the paper doesn't meet the standard of empirical evidence. Agreed?

a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

and that's empirical evidence based on what?

It's not about God, it's about evidence, it's sad you have to drag God into a simple thread about empirical evidence
It's your best defense, deflection
"Let's attack their faith so nobody notices that we have no real evidence, pseudo science"

If it's pointless, just leave without the trolling

a reply to: Phantom423

Am I really?
Really?
Has it taken you this long to work that out, really?

Agree?
With what,agree with what I have been asking you and your friends to do for over a year, do I agree, are you kidding, did you miss something, like the whole thread, agree?
What?
Serious?

Yes Phants, you could say that I agree, please do your best, do your worst, do something, please for all those hopeing someone will shut me up because they can't, do something

Finally, yes I agree, I thought I was asking anyone to do this very thing and someone would agree to do what you are saying you are/may/probably won't, do

Agreed?