Friendly reminder: Hillary Clinton still hasn't had a open press conference.

a reply to: enlightenedservant

The oligarchy has long planned (read their own quotes in their own publications on the matter) to structure the NWO by marrying bastardized Communism with bastardized Monopolistic Capitalism. That's their LONG HELD PLAN that they have been working ruthlessly to implement.

The part of Communism they delight in is the cruel tyranny aspect. And that is smack in the middle of the screechy one's personality.

Of course she would NOT want to give HER millions away but she's happy to take everyone else's . . .

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Grimpachi

she didnt actually have an announced "press conference"

The no press conference is still counting, the staged thing
with staged questions does not count.

Still.....240+ days and counting.

There is only ONE explanation!

She must be very very very afraid of facing the press.

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Grimpachi

Still.....240+ days and counting.

There is only ONE explanation!

She must be very very very afraid of facing the press.

Hillary is more afraid of Donald Trump. Not because he knows more about how the government works, but because he will throw her off her game. Sanders did that a bit, but Hillary know that the DNC had rigged the process against him, so she wasn't worried in the least. Debating with Trump will be TOTALLY unlike than anything she's ever encountered..except maybe her arguments with Bill.

a reply to: carewemust

She is obviosly scared to death to take questions
from the press that are not scripted!

What might she be afraid of?

I can think of plenty of questions that might cause her to shake in her shoes.

Not in order of importance:

1. Classified emails were sent on her personal email, stored on non secure
hard drive, and multiple devices.

2. Deleted emails that were the property of The State Department.

3. Lies to the American people about both of the above.

4. The Clinton Foundation, and all of the money from Saudi Arabia,
and now Sharia based education which donates 8% to Jihad supporting "charity".

5. The paid speech's what was in them?

6. Benghazi, the lie to the American people that it was caused by
an internet video, which turned out to be totally false.

7. Benghazi what we doing there in the first place, questions on
gun running to Libya, Turkey.

8. Burned and edited calendar coinciding with Clinton Foundation
donars.

9. Bills trips to Jeffrey Epstein's Island, 20+ trips.

10. War schemes, her private wars, Libya etc.

Tip of the iceberg, and yes please Donald Trump...
ask her these things, and do NOT wait till the debates!

a reply to: burntheships


Your excellent post just goes to show how ripe the pickings are for Trump, during this first debate. Yet, like you say, they're just the tip of the iceberg! It will take the next two weeks for the Trump family/team to figure out which ones can be asked during the limited time they have for debate. I hope the moderators let them "go at it".

All Hillary will be able to do is hit Trump on his University, Non-Disclosure of Taxes, and a few other things nobody cares about... like his wife being too beautiful for First Lady, LOL.

a reply to: carewemust

I hope he really weighs the issues, talk about the
very most important ones at the debates.

As we know, two are slotted to compete with NFL
games. Sound familiar Bernie?

The rest of the issues need to be addressed on
a rolling schedule, what do you think?
Rotate the issues a few for a few days,
then hit them all and start again?!

There are soundbites out there from Clinton,
he should use them! There are witnesses from
Benghazi, get them for ads!

Imo, she is such a flawed candidate, even her
latest "short circuit" lame excuse for why she lies,
she needs to be called out on this.

The United States can not afford to have a
69 year old luddite faker who short circuits as POTUS.

originally posted by: burntheships


She must be very very very afraid of facing the press.

I thought the Right wing thinks the democrats own the press/media.

a reply to: olaru12

1. The oligarchy owns the press and works all sides against the middle ruthlessly . . . and has for decades.

2. The oligarchy appears to have chosen the screechy one as the next Destroyer in Chief.

3. The press would still have to make an impression of giving the screechy one some half pointed questions else the charade would be toooooooooooo in everyone's faces.

a reply to: RickinVa

The media hasn't figured out that they need to pay her six figured speaking fee first.

originally posted by: TheBulk
I honestly think they could rationalize locking us all up or worse.

In a way they do.
They lock us into 'jobs' where we slave away so they can sit around and whine about us not paying our fair share.
Communisem has never worked.

Don't spread my wealth, spread my work ethic.

a reply to: RickinVa

And? At this point Trump is doing a good enough job at destroying his run the Clinton could sit back and do a damn thing and still win.

Personally I am still waiting for Trump's taxes returns.

originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: enlightenedservant

The oligarchy has long planned (read their own quotes in their own publications on the matter) to structure the NWO by marrying bastardized Communism with bastardized Monopolistic Capitalism. That's their LONG HELD PLAN that they have been working ruthlessly to implement.

The part of Communism they delight in is the cruel tyranny aspect. And that is smack in the middle of the screechy one's personality.

Of course she would NOT want to give HER millions away but she's happy to take everyone else's . . .

(Facepalm) Tyranny is neither limited to communism nor is a part of Marx's version of communism. You might as well say that every kingdom or dictatorship is "communism" since they can also have tyrants (even though they would economically be considered feudalism, which is on the exact opposite side of the spectrum as communism). Would you also consider Genghis Khan, Charlemagne, or King Richard III "communists" since they also were tyrants?

In fact, Marx's "pure" version of communism has no central govt and the community produces whatever it needs whenever it needs it. This is literally why Stalinism is widely rejected by actual Marxists; because Stalin was simply an authoritarian who claimed to use some elements of communism while actually consolidating power for himself. Socialism, on the other hand, has a central committee or system, but it's supposed to distribute the goods and services equally among the population. In theory, this system will replace itself with Marx's communism as it gets more efficient (as in, eventually no one will be needed to "plan" how to distribute things because the community will know by itself).

And for the record, Nazism and Communism were direct enemies. In fact, according to Hitler, communism was his biggest enemy. So calling Hillary a "Hitlarian, Stalinistic, Marxist" is completely wrong since Hitler and Stalin hated each other and 10s of millions of people died in their war of annihilation. And Stalin and Marx simply can't coexist, since Stalin rejected nearly every aspect of actual Marxism. And Hitler completely rejected Marx's teachings, literally considering them as his biggest opponent. You might as well call Hillary a "high tech, Amish, atheist".

And one last thing: please look up the definitions for the words "oligarchy" and "feudalism". You keep linking Hillary to an oligarchy, even though that supports my argument not yours. Communism does away with oligarchies, which is exactly the reason the Western empires fought against communism after WW2. The poor workers and 2nd class citizens in the Western & Japanese colonies fought to kick out the oligarchs and the entire "upper" class that supported them. Ever look into who the victims were in the communist purges? It always starts with the upper class, including bankers, scholars, officials, generals, royal families, administrators, etc.

There's no way in Hell that America's wealthy powerbrokers (aka Hillary's allies) are actually trying to implement Marxism or communism here. (pardon my language)

a reply to: intrptr

Conspiracy theories don't count. They never count.

a reply to: BO XIAN

We all know you harbor a secret crush on her. Don't lie about it.

a reply to: burntheships

Certainly those are troublesome questions she'd like to avoid.

However, I think that the KEY issue is her character, personality, pathologies.

EVERYONE KNOWS, THAT IF

SHE GETS ASKED THE WRONG QUESTION AND SHE RESPONDS TYPICALLY,

IT WILL BE ALL OVER

AS SHE FLIES INTO A PSYCHOTIC RAGE spewing all over those nearby on prime time TV

THAT'S THE issue that no press conferences are protecting her from--from herself.

a reply to: enlightenedservant

1. You seem to be talking theory vs reality.

2. You are simply WRONG.

3. You have evidently NOT read the oligarchy's/PTB/elite's words in their own writings and speeches. They have laid it out fairly clearly as I outlined above. You don't need to believe the truth. It doesn't change the truth. And, it's on the near enough horizon, you can stand by and watch it further unfold exactly as I outlined it above.

Rockefeller and some other well known's have pontificated at moderate length just as I outlined it.

BTW, there is NOT A SINGLE CASE where Communism has done away with oligarchies. They merely changed the membership and the labels.

a reply to: BO XIAN

I see you didn't address what Marxism actually is, the rivalry between Hitler's hatred for communism (which the West adopted during the Cold War), Hitler's hatred for Stalinism, or anything else I said. You seem to think "authoritarian" and "communism" are synonyms when they're not. And you seem to think oligarchs and Marxism are in cahoots, even though oligarchs would be stripped of their power in Marx's communism. Or did you forget that the hammer stands for the factory workers and the sickle stands for the farmers?

And yes, communist purges always wipe out the upper classes, either through wealth confiscations, mass arrests, or worse. Look at Ethiopia's former junta called the "Derg", Lenin's communist purge, and Mao's communist "purge". There's a reason Marxism, Leninism, Stalinism, and Maoism are treated as different systems. For example, Leninism strayed from Marxism by adding a special council to lead the transition from feudalism to communism, then killed off more than 1 million upper class people and their supporters. Don't forget, you're the one who said Hillary is Hitlerian, Marxist, Stalinist, and like Pol Pot. I'm simply pointing out how wrong your assertion is.

And since you keep saying "the elite", "tptb", and the "oligarchs", tell me this: who are you talking about? Specifically? Because it sounds like you're trying to convince me that the top execs at major hedge funds (they support Hillary) are somehow trying to spread communism in the US lol. Or the pharmaceutical execs that support Hillary are doing it to spread communism here, which is equally preposterous. They don't even want cheap healthcare much less single payer healthcare, but we're supposed to believe they actually want Marxism here? Yeah right.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: intrptr

Conspiracy theories don't count. They never count.

I counted on you saying that.

a reply to: enlightenedservant

You keep talking about theoretical Communism.

I keep talking about Communism in the nitty gritty of daily life and all the tyranny it implements.

a reply to: enlightenedservant

NWO COMMUNISM/CAPITALISM

LINKS, QUOTES ETC

Emphases often added and sometimes extra paragraphing for easier reading.
= = =
QUOTES BY ROCKEFELLERS
.
whale.to...
.

Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.– David Rockefeller
.
. . .
"...conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure -- one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." -----David Rockefeller
.
. . .

= = =
NWO QUOTES:
www.theforbiddenknowledge.com...
.

[out of sequence]
"The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is

to create a
one-world government
combining supercapitalism and Communism
under the same tent,
all under their control

.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent."
Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets
.
. . .
"To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism, and religious dogmas." - Brock Adams, Director UN Health Organization
"We are not going to achieve a New World Order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money." - Arthur Schlesinger Jr., 'The CFR Journal Foreign Affairs', August 1975.
"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond [i.e., an "extraterrestrial" invasion], whether real or *promulgated* [emphasis mine], that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this *scenario*, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government."
Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991
.
. . .

= = =
jesus-is-savior.com...

The war years saw the CPUSA actually renounce the class struggle and join the so-called "Roosevelt camp of progress" which included "progressive capitalists."
"The Communist Party now assumed the responsibility of establishing a rigid discipline over the working class. No employer was more effective or more relentless in checking strikes among the workers, or minimizing complaints...while wages rose a little during those years, they did not compare with the rise in profits and in monopoly control of basic necessities...war production was chiefly in the hands of ten large corporations...the Communists carefully muted such information." (153)
.
. . .
"A SECRET WELL-ORGANIZED WORLD POWER"
Bella Dodd was circumspect about the people behind the Communist Party. She once was told to phone two multi-millionaires who live in the Waldorf Towers if she lost contact with Moscow. Elsewhere, she refers to "a secret well organized world power." She is obviously afraid to be candid. She suspects that one CPUSA leader's "suicide" was in fact murder. (172)
.
. . .
"What now became clear to me was the collusion of these two forces: the Communists with their timetable for world control, and certain mercenary forces in the free world bent on making profits from blood." (229)
.
. . .
In conclusion, Communism was/is a plot designed to substitute a cabal of the rich for the rule of God. It is a utopian fraud hatched by the rich to thwart the dreams of ordinary people and stunt human progress. The same cabal is behind most wars including the impending attack on Iraq.
. . .

= = =


= = =
ROCKEFELLER INTERNATIONALISM:
www.bibliotecapleyades.net...

= = =
DAVID ROCKEFELLER:

www.nwotoday.com...

Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefeller, Memoirs, 2002

= = = =


= = =
www.bibliotecapleyades.net...
= = = =
www.jesus-is-savior.com...

Evidence will be produced to prove that Modern Communism was organized in the year 1773 by a group of International Money-Barons who have used it since, as their manual of action, to further their secret plans to bring about a Totalitarian Godless State. Lenin made this clear in his book Left Wing Communism. On page 53, he said: "Our theory (Communism) is not a dogma (Settled Doctrine); it is a manual of action. Many modern leaders have said and done the same things as Lucifer did during the heavenly revolution. There is no appreciable difference between Red and Black Atheism. The only difference is in the plans used by the opposing leaders to ultimately win undisputed control of the world's resources, and bring into being their ideas for a Totalitarian, Godless Dictatorship.
SOURCE: PAWNS IN THE GAME; chapter one, page 4; by William Guy Carr; 1958.
.
. . .
"This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long - We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
—David Rockefeller speaking at the UN, September 14, 1994

= = =

There is enormous evidence that you are largely wrong and somewhat talking about theory vs reality.