Welcome One and All to The 2016 Democratic National Convention

originally posted by: buckwhizzle
a reply to: angeldoll

Who cares? I care more about who is going to lead this country.

I agree. Just an off the cuff observation on my part. Not worth commenting on.

Rush Limbaugh said that Mothers who've had their sons murdered by police officers will be speaking. Maybe that's tomorrow night?

originally posted by: carewemust
Rush Limbaugh said that Mothers who've had their sons murdered by police officers will be speaking. Maybe that's tomorrow night?

That was tonite.

Some did. Some didn't.

a reply to: Grambler

They just make me sick.

It is the only form of protest that is effective these days.

As far as what I do, and will continue to do, I treat the artist's work with the same level of respect I feel from them.

If I admire their art and persona, I will spend my money to see it.

When a celebrity comes out in favor of thieving lying scum, intent on garnering support for the continued theft, corruption, and deception, I no longer respect their art.

If I happen to see said art, I assure you that in no way did I contribute monetarily to do so.

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: carewemust
Rush Limbaugh said that Mothers who've had their sons murdered by police officers will be speaking. Maybe that's tomorrow night?

That was tonite.

Some did. Some didn't.

OK.. thanks. Sounds like I didn't miss much.

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
That's a really good point DBCowboy.

So far, I don't think I've heard anyone at the DNC even address the issue of terrorism or the refugee crisis. It's like they want us to think it doesn't exist.

This is about getting the party nomination.

The issues of war and terrorism will be when Trump and Hillary go head to head in debate.

Anything to Nit Pick.

So here is what I am getting as the main difference between these two conventions messages.

The RNC was about all of the problems of the country; economy, crime, terrorism, illegal immigration, race relations particularly with the police, healthcare. They are saying we need a change and someone who isn't a normal politician.

The DNC is saying things are pretty good, but could get better. They are saying Hillary has experience, and it would be historic to elect a woman.

To me, I think many votes in this election will come down to what do you believe, are things getting bad in this country, or are they pretty good.

My vote is that things are getting bad, and I think that most people will agree with that. Now certainly other things will influence the election, such as corrupt media, email leaks, etc. but we shall see.

Remember this post for the presidents upcoming endorsement how awesome Clinton is.

Burn it in to your mind.

President Obama says he cannot rule out the possibility of GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump being his successor.

Obama on Trump win: 'Anything is possible’

a reply to: neo96

Relevance? Is anyone arguing anything is possible?

a reply to: neo96


Why is President Obama even bothering to state what's obvious, and what's true several months before any Presidential election day?

Albright on DNC hack: Putin eager for Trump to win

PHILADELPHIA – Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright alluded to the hack of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) during her convention speech Tuesday night, saying recent events suggested Russia is eager for Donald Trump to win the White House.

Something else to remember the SONY hack was nothing more than hype for a movie.

North Korea got the blame just a Russia is getting the blame.

Who Really Hacked Sony?

I wouldn't put it past the Clinton camp itself to garner the sympathy vote.

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: queenofswords

Exactly my tjoughts on the RNC and how simple it is to manipulate republican. A flag. God. Done and done.

Like seriously? Whaddaya think Rah Rah Flag Waving - - Bring Back America is?

Why is Putin afraid of Hillary?

nm

a reply to: Annee

I assume because Hillary won't roll over for Putin the way Donald will.

originally posted by: neo96
Our muslim sponsors are STATE SPONSORS of terrorism around the globe.

Saudi Arabia.

Iran,Kuwait,Qatar.

The list goes on.

Albright KNOWS THIS.

As the oldest sitting Congressional member I find it APPALLING
that you would characterize Senator Ms.Albright as an advocate
of state sponsored terrorism. /sarc
Unfortunately you and I both know the City of London INVENTED
the Muslim Brotherhood in the early '20s.. and almost everything
since has been a result of the Anglican-American deliberate
meddling in the Middle East in order to destabilize (subjugate) it.
Wow, "Down with Mosadec, Up with the Shah." Cool.

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: Annee

I assume because Hillary won't roll over for Putin the way Donald will.

Doesn't that say something?

In all the gibberish going on back and forth - - - this strikes me as significant.