It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: alldaylong
Uhhhhhhhhhh . . .
How old are you?
You seem rather demanding that others be perfect in their recall in order to be credible . . . to . . . drum roll . . .
you.
Guess what . . . humans are inherently imperfect without being useless.
Sheesh.
Perhaps you could THINK! a LOT better.
originally posted by: 1947boomer
originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: data5091
The report sounds like a load of cobblers.
The Bluesteak Missile was a British built missile and from what i gather it was never used by The U.S.
I suggest that he may have been confusing the BLUESTREAK (which was, as you point out, a British ballistic missile) with the BLUE SCOUT, which was a USAF version of NASA's Scout sounding rocket and which was, in fact, launched from VAFB in the 1960's. The 73 year old witness seems to have had a "senior moment".
originally posted by: schuyler
Most interesting is that he debunks a rather famous sighting:
A comment on the film, “Out of the Blue”, where it describes an incident at VAFB where a UFO supposedly shot lasers at, and disrupted, what appeared to be a Titan Delta flight; I was at VAFB at the time of the first Titan augmented flights and no such incident happened that I was aware of.
Link in OP post.
originally posted by: Urantia1111
originally posted by: schuyler
Most interesting is that he debunks a rather famous sighting:
A comment on the film, “Out of the Blue”, where it describes an incident at VAFB where a UFO supposedly shot lasers at, and disrupted, what appeared to be a Titan Delta flight; I was at VAFB at the time of the first Titan augmented flights and no such incident happened that I was aware of.
Link in OP post.
THAT'S what's most interesting to you?
Figures.
Actually, that famous case took place in 1964.
This guy wasn't there until the following year.
No debunk this time.
Regarding the second report we featured last week, about alleged UFO-related events on, or near, Vandenberg AFB, north of Los Angeles, several people contacted our Center about some of the information provided in that report. Several people questioned whether the USAF SR-71 can fly at 3,500 miles per hour, and still others commented that they were unable to find information about a single-stage missile, call “Blue streak.” For the benefit of visitors to our site, we copy “in toto” the comments from one reader. At this time, we take no definitive position with regard to the report, except to convey our gratitude to the gentleman who submitted it, who seemed to us to be quite sincere in his description of the events described. We welcome additional comments from readers, particularly from those who may have been stationed at Vandenberg AFB, or who are personally familiar with some of the technical issues addressed by the report.
Hi Peter, Upon more research, a few more details of this report got my attention that just don't seem to add up--reasons given with citations. Now, it's not my intention to de-bunk any witness out of hand. However, I'm concerned this subject gets ridiculed when claims appear to be on shaky ground. Honestly, I'm unsure about the reasons for this level of inaccuracy--it's only for your consideration. Hopefully in the future I'll be able to supply analyses which help support/augment the witness, as what I did for sighting S122278. Best regards, ((name deleted))
“I have witnessed several incidents, while launching Atlas D missiles from South Vandenberg (Point Arguello), LF04 & LF05.”
Launch facility 04 (LF-04) is located on the far north end of Vandenberg AFB. It was used to launch the Minuteman IA, Minuteman II, Minuteman III.
Launch facility 05 (LF-05) is also located on the far north end of Vandenberg AFB. It was used to launch the Minuteman IA, Minuteman II, Minuteman III, and Peacekeeper.
Atlas D and Atlas F were launched from Complex 576A-576G, all on the north half of the base. Those launch sites located south near Point Arguello are PALC-C, SLC-5, SLC-6, and SLC-8, None of these sites appear to have been involved in Thor or Atlas launches.
“At the time, the launch films were classified as Secret. If they still exist, they would likely be held wherever SAC stored such data, after turning the base over to NASA.“
Vandenberg AFB is currently active, and was never “turned over to NASA”. In fact, the opposite is true. In 1972, Vandenberg was selected as the West Coast Space Shuttle launch and landing site. Due to technical problems and the Challenger disaster in 1986, this resulted in the official termination of the Shuttle program at Vandenberg on 26 December 1989.
“A comment on the film, “Out of the Blue”, where it describes an incident at VAFB where a UFO supposedly shot lasers at, and disrupted, what appeared to be a Titan Delta flight; I was at VAFB at the time of the first Titan augmented flights and no such incident happened that I was aware of.”
So I just watched the documentary. The incident in question happened in 1964. It involved a tracking site in Big Sur,124 miles north, while filming an Atlas missile launch at Vandenberg.
One last observation regarding “Duration: 30 minutes (each)” If each incident was observed for 30 minutes, was the UFO still following the missile? Did it stay in the launch area, or follow the missile into space? At around 3 minutes, an ICBM would be in space (apogee) and very far downrange.
We welcome additional comments from readers, particularly from those who may have been stationed at Vandenberg AFB, or who are personally familiar with some of the technical issues addressed by the report.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: spiritualarchitect
Quite a few according to this...
Vandenberg launch failures
originally posted by: spiritualarchitect
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: spiritualarchitect
Quite a few according to this...
Vandenberg launch failures
98 failed launches in 1965? How can we be sure these are all the failures and not all the actual launches?