It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: UKTruth
I totally agree. He should use them more because he sucks at just talking off the cuff. The reason he sounds smart when using a teleprompter is because those are carefully crafted speeches using the words of a speech writer instead of what comes to his mind randomly.
He has been using them more too. Even in spite of him speaking out against using them. Which doesn't exactly fill me with confidence that he knows WTF he's doing.
His "Great Brain" and "Best Words" aren't exactly shinning through when he relies on them all by themselves.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Grimpachi
What I mean is that it's hard to start using them and not come off looking hypocritical after making a statement like that.
But obviously he can't rely on just his "Great Brain and Best Words" alone because he comes off looking like a Bully and Xenophobic Prick when he does.
It would have been better if he'd not made that statement however, which was nothing more than his ego writing checks that even he can't cash.
The fact is, he needs a teleprompter more than anyone in order to make up for his lack of actual knowledge and ability to speak publicly.
originally posted by: UKTruth
I think hypocrisy is well established on both sides now. It almost doesn't matter anymore. It would take both candidates the rest of their lives to come up with some strategy to wind back all the inconsistencies.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: neo96
Of course he does. Like he knows the constitution right?
You know where he says he'll defend article 1, article 2, article 12.....when there is no article 12.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: UKTruth
I agree. One thing I learned about speaking in front of people is that if you want to do well you have to know your subject. I mean know all the ins and outs and every aspect of what it is you're talking about. Especially if there are questions being asked. Otherwise you stumble around and look stupid. Even if you don't have an answer you have to answer as to why you don't have an answer for that as of yet.
That's if you want to come across as knowing what you're talking about of course. The other method is what most politicians use which is that you learn clever methods of spinning the questions or redirecting your answers so that you never really address the questions and give no real information back in your answers. That is all just word play however and it only works for a short time. Usually just long enough for you to get out of there and on to your next appointment. However, people feel as if they got an answer until they actually think about it and realize they got nothing but noise.
originally posted by: intrepid
a reply to: mOjOm
Bombast sells. See Sam Kinnison. Trump is nothing if not an excellent salesman. This market is HUGE and diverse though. Like Sam, an acquired taste.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth
Are you certain of that claim about hillary using uh because I listened to a few clips and I didn't hear it once.
m.youtube.com...
m.youtube.com...
Here's two. But please feel free to find your own examples.
originally posted by: UKTruth
Whether it's wise to elect a person with little to no experience is the question America faces. It's that or the continuation of corruption and war. It's a tough choice. I don't actually envy Americans that choice.
originally posted by: mOjOm
originally posted by: UKTruth
Whether it's wise to elect a person with little to no experience is the question America faces. It's that or the continuation of corruption and war. It's a tough choice. I don't actually envy Americans that choice.
It's "The Evil you know vs. The Evil you Don't". So while I may not like what Clinton is going to do, I at least have a good idea of what it is she's going to do. With Trump you just don't know. So while I may not like what Clinton is going to do I can probably live through it and deal with it later if it goes her way. Plus there is the hope she may not do what I think or not do all of it and it won't actually be that bad.
Trump being a wild card, especially now with everything holding on by a thread is a problem. Some of what he wants to do, just like Hillary, I think is a terrible idea. But I'll probably live through it. Hopefully. But a major problem is that even his best selling points are starting to fail now. He was Mr. Anti-Establishment which was good, but now he's surrounding himself with all the Establishment Clowns and Establishment Power anyway. So his one good quality is quickly vanishing leaving just the cheap shell in it's place which I didn't like that part to begin with.
Those 3rd party choices are really looking good in comparison I'll tell you that.