It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New Black Panther Party says to carry arms in Cleveland if legal

page: 4
9
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 07:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: intrptr

Pssst.. You may not know this but not all black people live in hoods.

And you're covering that police brutality there isn't focused on them.




posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 07:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: neo96


IF they get stupid the POLICE have a RIGHT to shoot them.


If the police get stupid do they have a right to shoot them?


Nope.



If they perceive the police to be a tyrannical arm of the government, when do they have the right to exercise that right in self-defense of tyrannical government?


Newsflash.

PERCEPTION isn't reality.


So where IS reality? Everyone has a subjective perception of the world around them, so everyone is only operating off of their own perceptions.

Who's perception reigns supreme? Who's perception of reality is the one we should all take as truth?



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 07:13 PM
link   
a reply to: JimNasium

Amazing, the only star you got for that is from me.

You sir have my deepest respect.



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 07:17 PM
link   
a reply to: MystikMushroom


Who's perception reigns supreme? Who's perception of reality is the one we should all take as truth?

You know the truth by knowing the lies, once you omit the false hoods whether intentional or mistaken, then whats left is the truth.

That goes back to knowing the truth and the truth making you free (from doubt).
edit on 12-7-2016 by intrptr because: bb code



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 07:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: MystikMushroom

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: neo96


IF they get stupid the POLICE have a RIGHT to shoot them.


If the police get stupid do they have a right to shoot them?


Nope.



If they perceive the police to be a tyrannical arm of the government, when do they have the right to exercise that right in self-defense of tyrannical government?


Newsflash.

PERCEPTION isn't reality.


So where IS reality? Everyone has a subjective perception of the world around them, so everyone is only operating off of their own perceptions.

Who's perception reigns supreme? Who's perception of reality is the one we should all take as truth?


This is REALITY.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Not RACIST organizations like Black Panthers, and BLM.



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 07:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: MystikMushroom

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: neo96


IF they get stupid the POLICE have a RIGHT to shoot them.


If the police get stupid do they have a right to shoot them?


Nope.



If they perceive the police to be a tyrannical arm of the government, when do they have the right to exercise that right in self-defense of tyrannical government?


Newsflash.

PERCEPTION isn't reality.


So where IS reality? Everyone has a subjective perception of the world around them, so everyone is only operating off of their own perceptions.

Who's perception reigns supreme? Who's perception of reality is the one we should all take as truth?


This is REALITY.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Not RACIST organizations like Black Panthers, and BLM.


The 2nd amendment does not specify that the right is dependent upon certain personally-held beliefs.


edit on 12-7-2016 by introvert because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 07:29 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Hmmm... That sounds like something a certain 18th century king would say about a rebellious colony. Do you know what happened when that king tried to forcibly take the firearms from those rebellious organizations?




posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 07:31 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Do you want to get back to the topic.

Ya know that was about people like THIS:



Bringing guns to a political convention.
edit on 12-7-2016 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 07:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Krakatoa


Is that a sarcastic remark?


Yes, it was.

We agree with one another, in this thread.



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 07:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Liquesence

Thanks for the clarification.



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 07:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Krakatoa

The founding fathers didn't rebel because they wanted free food,healthcare, and other nonsense.

Trying to compare the black panthers to the FF is about as an EPIC false equivalence as their is.



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 07:34 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Another nice deflection.

You're 2nd amendment "cred" keeps slipping away.
edit on 12-7-2016 by introvert because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 07:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: neo96

Hmmm... That sounds like something a certain 18th century king would say about a rebellious colony. Do you know what happened when that king tried to forcibly take the firearms from those rebellious organizations?



Excellent observation.



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 07:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: neo96


IF they get stupid the POLICE have a RIGHT to shoot them.


If the police get stupid do they have a right to shoot them?


Nope.



If they perceive the police to be a tyrannical arm of the government, when do they have the right to exercise that right in self-defense of tyrannical government?


Newsflash.

PERCEPTION isn't reality.


ahaha. you should say that to the police.



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 07:35 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

I wasn't comparing them to the FF, I was comparing your statement to that of a tyrannical king. That is how it starts. We strip the rights from someone because we do not like their politics or radical position (even though they have as individuals done nothing illegal to warrant that action). Then, who is next? Perhaps something you stand firm for is the next on the list of radical organizations?


edit on 7/12/2016 by Krakatoa because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 07:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Krakatoa

The founding fathers didn't rebel because they wanted free food,healthcare, and other nonsense.

Trying to compare the black panthers to the FF is about as an EPIC false equivalence as their is.


wow... christ



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 07:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Krakatoa

Another great response.




posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 07:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Krakatoa

Right because I am in 'charge' of anything.

I have 'oppressed' xyz.

Please.



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 07:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Krakatoa

The founding fathers didn't rebel because they wanted free food,healthcare, and other nonsense.

Trying to compare the black panthers to the FF is about as an EPIC false equivalence as their is.


What other nonsense?

You really think all BLM wants is free stuff?

The FF rebelled, in part, because of an ever encroaching tyrannical system from which they wanted to be freed.

Or should rebels only be white guys with guns?



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 07:39 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Deflection ?

www.abovetopsecret.com...

That's the TOPIC.




top topics



 
9
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join