It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes
Not in some people, that's true. But they do prevent most people who are exposed to a disease from becoming infected. It is also true that some people cannot be vaccinated for valid medical reasons.
Oh, wait, they don't prevent disease, which is the whole point.
So what happens is this. If more people are vaccinated it means fewer will become infected. The fewer that are infected means the chances that someone who cannot be vaccinated (or someone who does not obtain sufficient immunity from being vaccinated) will encounter an infected person are reduced.
While the risk of infection cannot be entirely eliminated, it can be greatly mitigated. The more people are vaccinated, the greater the mitigation of the risk.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes
Yes. The same thing. Reducing risk to the children who attend the day care centers.
No, not the same thing at all.
Allergies to components of the vaccine. In the case of flu, egg proteins in particular. There are vaccines that are contraindicated for pregnant women.
Why can't they get them?
What?
Why should I get sick for someone else?
They can sick from you. That's why if you're going to be caring for groups of children you should be immunized.
Why can't they get sick for me?
I did not say it does. (But the OP says, falsely, that the law does so).
Not getting a vaccination does not put a person in the category of criminal.
False. You clearly have no understanding of how vaccinations work. Which is no surprise.
Add to those the distinct possibility that people can become too dependent on a shot, and lose a natural ability to fight off disease.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes
I did not say it does. (But the OP says, falsely, that the law does so).
Not getting a vaccination does not put a person in the category of criminal.
I said the rationale for not allowing unvaccinated people to work at day care facilities is the same as the rationale for not allowing convicted criminals to work at day care facilities. Both raise safety issues for the children. In order to mitigate those risks unvaccinated people are not permitted to work there nor are convicted criminals.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes
False. You clearly have no understanding of how vaccinations work. Which is no surprise.
Add to those the distinct possibility that people can become too dependent on a shot, and lose a natural ability to fight off disease.