It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You started off with a lie
originally posted by: Informer1958
Lets see all the politician take the shots first following by all medical professionals, I think not!
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: Phage
The problem is that they are messing with people's ability to make a living unless they comply.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Bedlam
(2) The person submits a written statement from a licensed physician providing that the person has evidence of current immunity to the diseases described in subdivision (a).
Th bill does nothing that you listed either.
Now, legislators in California want to pass the “first US adult vaccine mandate with NO personal exemptions and CRIMINAL penalties for failure to comply.”
Even though it has now been proven that many of the vaccines have toxins that can later kill you.
Even though it has now been proven that many of the vaccines have toxins that can later kill you
I never told a lie in my OP. You believe you are calling me out like page tried to do, however both of you are wrong in your "assumptions" towards my OP
originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: Phage
I gather you see no incrementalism hazards in such things.
AT what point would you begin to feel aversive toward such moves, laws, strategies?
Do you even have a theoretical line in the sand?
I can't see anything nefarious there, rather it's protecting children from exposure to unvaccinated adults.
(A) If the State Department of Social Services finds that the applicant or any other person specified in subdivision (b) has been convicted of a crime, other than a minor traffic violation, the application shall be denied, unless the director grants an exemption pursuant to subdivision (f).