It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Which came first dinosaur or the egg

page: 1
6
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 01:50 AM
link   
*Can mod please move to origins and creationism*

Yes I'm aware this topic has countless topics but bare with me I'm new to Ats.

Ok, doesent it take two chicken to make an egg? Which is why I believe the chicken somehow had to come first.
Take human for example you wouldn't need two to create to have the billions we have. Wouldn't you need at least 4, so that they would actually be able to breed efficiently without the many birth defects that happen when brother-sister, dad-daughter, mom-son or something to that natur
edit on 8-6-2016 by ssenerawa because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 01:57 AM
link   
Definitely new don't create the same thread twice.



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 01:58 AM
link   
All procreating animals create eggs.

The question might be, which was the first animal that laid eggs as opposed to carrying their embryos inside themselves.



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: GemmyMcGemJew
Definitely new don't create the same thread twice.
i didn't how to delete the other one at first it was in the wrong category



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: smirkley
All procreating animals create eggs.

The question might be, which was the first animal that laid eggs as opposed to carrying their embryos inside themselves.
It was no first that did it, anything that does it had to already been that way in the beginning, can't evolve to lay eggs
edit on 8-6-2016 by ssenerawa because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: smirkley
All procreating animals create eggs.

The question might be, which was the first animal that laid eggs as opposed to carrying their embryos inside themselves.
It was no first that did it, anything that does it had to already been that way in the beginning, can't evolve to lay eggs


Yes, something can evolve to lay eggs. That's the whole thing with evolution, it changes what was to what is.



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:14 AM
link   
a reply to: ssenerawa

New or not you have asked an interesting question.

I wonder though if the question actually starts far too late in earth's animal kingdom. I had assumed dinosaurs were the first lot of animals but there were others millions of years before them when earth's climate had a higher oxygen content. But again we face your question egg or hermaphrodite or something else?



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: smirkley
All procreating animals create eggs.

The question might be, which was the first animal that laid eggs as opposed to carrying their embryos inside themselves.
It was no first that did it, anything that does it had to already been that way in the beginning, can't evolve to lay eggs


Yes, something can evolve to lay eggs. That's the whole thing with evolution, it changes what was to what is.
you sir are delusional if you think any species already living that didn't lay eggs at first. Can evolve to lay eggs



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: smirkley
All procreating animals create eggs.

The question might be, which was the first animal that laid eggs as opposed to carrying their embryos inside themselves.
It was no first that did it, anything that does it had to already been that way in the beginning, can't evolve to lay eggs


Yes, something can evolve to lay eggs. That's the whole thing with evolution, it changes what was to what is.
you sir are delusional if you think any species already living that didn't lay eggs at first. Can evolve to lay eggs


You sir, obviously have no clue what evolution is.

Evolution is change. The change can be anything. Including going from internal eggs to laying eggs and vice versa.



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:26 AM
link   

edit on 8-6-2016 by ssenerawa because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:28 AM
link   

edit on 8-6-2016 by ssenerawa because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: smirkley
All procreating animals create eggs.

The question might be, which was the first animal that laid eggs as opposed to carrying their embryos inside themselves.
It was no first that did it, anything that does it had to already been that way in the beginning, can't evolve to lay eggs


Yes, something can evolve to lay eggs. That's the whole thing with evolution, it changes what was to what is.
you sir are delusional if you think any species already living that didn't lay eggs at first. Can evolve to lay eggs. Similar but unique DNA sequences occurring is not evolution but an entirely different and unique species. where do you see animals evolving, they either live or die? And haven't any monkeys evolved to humans yet?


So this isn't about eggs and dinosaurs. This is about you denying evolution?
edit on 862016 by TerryDon79 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: smirkley
All procreating animals create eggs.

The question might be, which was the first animal that laid eggs as opposed to carrying their embryos inside themselves.
It was no first that did it, anything that does it had to already been that way in the beginning, can't evolve to lay eggs


Yes, something can evolve to lay eggs. That's the whole thing with evolution, it changes what was to what is.
you sir are delusional if you think any species already living that didn't lay eggs at first. Can evolve to lay eggs


You sir, obviously have no clue what evolution is.

Evolution is change. The change can be anything. Including going from internal eggs to laying eggs and vice versa.
Similar but unique DNA sequences occurring is not evolution but an entirely different and unique species. where do you see animals evolving, they either live or die? And haven't any monkeys evolved to humans yet?



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: smirkley
All procreating animals create eggs.

The question might be, which was the first animal that laid eggs as opposed to carrying their embryos inside themselves.
It was no first that did it, anything that does it had to already been that way in the beginning, can't evolve to lay eggs


Yes, something can evolve to lay eggs. That's the whole thing with evolution, it changes what was to what is.
you sir are delusional if you think any species already living that didn't lay eggs at first. Can evolve to lay eggs


You sir, obviously have no clue what evolution is.

Evolution is change. The change can be anything. Including going from internal eggs to laying eggs and vice versa.
Similar but unique DNA sequences occurring is not evolution but an entirely different and unique species. where do you see animals evolving, they either live or die? And haven't any monkeys evolved to humans yet?


How many times are you going to delete your reply and post the near same thing?

We didn't evolve from monkeys, so why would monkeys evolve into us?



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:37 AM
link   

edit on 8-6-2016 by ssenerawa because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:38 AM
link   
a reply to: ssenerawa

You're certainly showing a lot right here.



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: smirkley
All procreating animals create eggs.

The question might be, which was the first animal that laid eggs as opposed to carrying their embryos inside themselves.
It was no first that did it, anything that does it had to already been that way in the beginning, can't evolve to lay eggs


Yes, something can evolve to lay eggs. That's the whole thing with evolution, it changes what was to what is.
you sir are delusional if you think any species already living that didn't lay eggs at first. Can evolve to lay eggs


You sir, obviously have no clue what evolution is.

Evolution is change. The change can be anything. Including going from internal eggs to laying eggs and vice versa.
Similar but unique DNA sequences occurring is not evolution but an entirely different and unique species. where do you see animals evolving, they either live or die? And haven't any monkeys evolved to humans yet?


How many times are you going to delete your reply and post the near same thing?

We didn't evolve from monkeys, so why would monkeys evolve into us?
I'm just figuring all this quote stuff out, I'm trying bro



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:39 AM
link   
a reply to: ssenerawa

Just go read your special book of fairy tales. I'm sure that's got all the answers you'll ever want.

As for science, leave that to the grown ups.



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:40 AM
link   



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: smirkley
All procreating animals create eggs.

The question might be, which was the first animal that laid eggs as opposed to carrying their embryos inside themselves.
It was no first that did it, anything that does it had to already been that way in the beginning, can't evolve to lay eggs


Yes, something can evolve to lay eggs. That's the whole thing with evolution, it changes what was to what is.
you sir are delusional if you think any species already living that didn't lay eggs at first. Can evolve to lay eggs. Similar but unique DNA sequences occurring is not evolution but an entirely different and unique species. where do you see animals evolving, they either live or die? And haven't any monkeys evolved to humans yet?


So this isn't about eggs and dinosaurs. This is about too denying evolution?

I was told it was for denying ignorance




top topics



 
6
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join