It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Which came first dinosaur or the egg

page: 2
5
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: Lysergic


That might be a bit to advanced for some around here. They still don't understand how a book works.




posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: Lysergic


So if a species was not in homeostasis and constantly too cold, you honestly believe it would eventually grow fur?

What? No animal species we know has evolved to favor it's environment, animals find their environment not evolve to adapt to it like you were taught. It's survival of the fittest in the wild you either go extinct or don't
edit on 8-6-2016 by ssenerawa because: (no reason given)

edit on 8-6-2016 by ssenerawa because: (no reason given)

edit on 8-6-2016 by ssenerawa because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:47 AM
link   
a reply to: ssenerawa

If you actually watched it, you would have realized it answers your question about half way through.

Yet you didn't.

But you replied.


So please, do educate us.
edit on 8-6-2016 by Lysergic because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Lysergic


That might be a bit to advanced for some around here. They still don't understand how a book works.
Why didn't you reply to my other comment..



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Lysergic


That might be a bit to advanced for some around here. They still don't understand how a book works.
Why didn't you reply to my other comment..


The one about denying ignorance? I already did.



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: Lysergic
a reply to: ssenerawa

If you actually watched it, you would have realized it answers your question about half way through.

Yet you didn't.

But you replied.


So please, do educate us.
Can't you answer my question with your own brain though?



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:50 AM
link   
a reply to: ssenerawa

Can't you use google?



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Lysergic


That might be a bit to advanced for some around here. They still don't understand how a book works.
Why didn't you reply to my other comment..


The one about denying ignorance? I already did.
So because I'm new to Ats and didn't know how to quote correctly at first you stop answering my questions pretty much



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:51 AM
link   
Prove your OP.



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Lysergic
a reply to: ssenerawa

Can't you use google?


Can't you use your useless sack of neurons?



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Lysergic


That might be a bit to advanced for some around here. They still don't understand how a book works.
Why didn't you reply to my other comment..


The one about denying ignorance? I already did.
So because I'm new to Ats and didn't know how to quote correctly at first you stop answering my questions pretty much


I already answers your question. That's he second time I have said that. Learn to read.



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:53 AM
link   
a reply to: ssenerawa

Aww whats wrong, feeling a bit creationist?



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: Lysergic
Prove your OP.
Nothing to prove I'm asking the Ats members on how the perceive creationism and the chicken and egg concept. I never tried to convince anyone of anything



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:56 AM
link   
a reply to: ssenerawa

You said the chicken came first.




originally posted by: ssenerawa


Which is why I believe the chicken somehow had to come first.


and then this gem of wisdom;


Take human for example you wouldn't need two to create to have the billions we have. Wouldn't you need at least 4, so that they would actually be able to breed efficiently without the many birth defects that happen when brother-sister, dad-daughter, mom-son or something to that natur

edit on 8-6-2016 by Lysergic because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: Lysergic
Prove your OP.
Nothing to prove I'm asking the Ats members on how the perceive creationism and the chicken and egg concept. I never tried to convince anyone of anything


Actually, that's false. You asked which came first, the dinosaur or the egg. You mever once stated anything about creationism.

This is nothing more than a poor attempt at a bait thread.



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: Lysergic
a reply to: ssenerawa

Aww whats wrong, feeling a bit creationist?

Not at all, you just keep referring to a video on the theory on evolution without using your brain for once
edit on 8-6-2016 by ssenerawa because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: Lysergic
a reply to: ssenerawa

Aww whats wrong, feeling a bit creationist?

Not at all, you just keep referring to a book of the theory on evolution without using your brain for once


A theory backed up by evidence.



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 02:59 AM
link   
a reply to: ssenerawa

Watch it, you might learn something.



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 03:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: Lysergic
a reply to: ssenerawa

Watch it, you might learn something.


Thanks for the laugh lol.



posted on Jun, 8 2016 @ 03:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: Lysergic
a reply to: ssenerawa

You said the chicken came first.




originally posted by: ssenerawa


Which is why I believe the chicken somehow had to come first.


and then this gem of wisdom;


Take human for example you wouldn't need two to create to have the billions we have. Wouldn't you need at least 4, so that they would actually be able to breed efficiently without the many birth defects that happen when brother-sister, dad-daughter, mom-son or something to that natur
That's my opinion. It's not in a persuasive matter is it?




top topics



 
5
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join