It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In the middle of the Cassiopeia Super nova you can see the single white dot, orb. I have seen this same dot in other nova's. Nucleus, point of singularity? Point of creation??
originally posted by: wildespace
originally posted by: nOraKat
Does anyone know if there are videos of galactic events online?
In our galaxy, it takes about 225-250 million years to complete one journey around the galaxy’s center, so I don't think we would be able to see it spin if we watched it on a video, but I was wondering if maybe we can observe movement in some other galaxies on a video.
For example are there any movies/video of 2 galaxies colliding? Or one simply moving? Anybody know?
No, those kinds of events are too slow for us to notice, even if we filmed them over the course of a century. What we did manage to "film" was supernovae flashing up and dimming in other galaxies:
www.youtube.com...
The only noticeable movement in deep space was only filmed in our own galaxy, such as expanding supernova remnants or jets from planet formation:
www.youtube.com...
I stand by what I said.
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
Personally, I think Einsteins real genius was in his Quotes, not his math.
I'm gonna take a guess here and assume you are unwilling or unable (most likely ) to show us all exactly how Einsteins maths are wrong?
And please don't say you didn't say that. It's very clear to all what you are implying.
Meanwhile..Einsteins equations will continue to be used day in day out for applications used by everyone; yes including you!
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
In the middle of the Cassiopeia Super nova you can see the single white dot, orb. I have seen this same dot in other nova's. Nucleus, point of singularity? Point of creation??
Instead, this finding of bright, blue light unexpectedly reveals these fluctuations may come from something called "intrahalo light," which is created by stars flung into intergalactic space during titanic collisions and mergers of galaxies. The researchers found that there was as much light from these intergalactic stars as there was from stars located in galaxies. "This light is equal to all the light from stars in galaxies," Bock told Space.com. "This is telling us that stars are torn from their galaxies more often than previously thought." -
www.space.com...
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: 3danimator2014
Yes , a recent study by NASA suggests that nearly Half the stars out there are orphaned from their Galaxies.
Instead, this finding of bright, blue light unexpectedly reveals these fluctuations may come from something called "intrahalo light," which is created by stars flung into intergalactic space during titanic collisions and mergers of galaxies. The researchers found that there was as much light from these intergalactic stars as there was from stars located in galaxies. "This light is equal to all the light from stars in galaxies," Bock told Space.com. "This is telling us that stars are torn from their galaxies more often than previously thought." -
www.space.com...
That's a lot of rogue stars.
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: charlyv
perimeter that the universe is expanding into. What that may look like is mind boggling... no time or space exists at the boundary until it is suddenly occupied....
are "perimeter" and "boundary" the correct phraseology to use? If no time or space exists at the boundary prior to occupation how long for or how far away has expansion occurred?
why call it a perimeter if there is nothing or nothing created outside of such perimeter. What is it a boundary of?
My head hurts!
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
Personally, I think Einsteins real genius was in his Quotes, not his math.
I'm gonna take a guess here and assume you are unwilling or unable (most likely ) to show us all exactly how Einsteins maths are wrong?
And please don't say you didn't say that. It's very clear to all what you are implying.
Meanwhile..Einsteins equations will continue to be used day in day out for applications used by everyone; yes including you!
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: charlyv
perimeter that the universe is expanding into. What that may look like is mind boggling... no time or space exists at the boundary until it is suddenly occupied....
are "perimeter" and "boundary" the correct phraseology to use? If no time or space exists at the boundary prior to occupation how long for or how far away has expansion occurred?
why call it a perimeter if there is nothing or nothing created outside of such perimeter. What is it a boundary of?