Nuke Threat On Southern Border: Texas Game Wardens Issued Radiation Detectors

a reply to: MysterX

I don't think it's far fetched at all.

As I was praying one day, I strongly felt such was the case a decade or two before I read anything about it. Then I began to read very obscure articles about it here and there.

I firmly believe it's true. I think the whole nuclear waste thing is a scam designed to hinder making cheap power just as their withholding decentralized cheap suitcase sized 'zero point' power units for cars and homes prevents greater freedoms and prosperity--as well as cleaning up the environment and increasing desalted water massively.

a reply to: BO XIAN

Who knows what the hell goes on behind the closed doors of the powerful and influential.

I certainly don't. But if what you say was revealed to be true, and they hold all the control and have positioned assets within all relevant agencies and so on...there's not an awful lot the averge Joe could do about it, even if they could be bothered to take the burger out of their mouth and get off the sofa long enough to actually try.

originally posted by: MysterX
a reply to: BO XIAN

Who knows what the hell goes on behind the closed doors of the powerful and influential.

I certainly don't. But if what you say was revealed to be true, and they hold all the control and have positioned assets within all relevant agencies and so on...there's not an awful lot the average Joe could do about it, even if they could be bothered to take the burger out of their mouth and get off the sofa long enough to actually try.

Quite so. Quite so.

Having watched such things since 1965 . . . it has steadily incrementally worsened almost by the week. Certainly by the month.

And, it is clearly too late in the game to even more than slow the onslaught down--except by prayer.

There clearly WILL BE a tyrannical global government and one world religion. And the object of worship of that one world religion is not a nice character.

The TIME MACHINE sequence of the Eloi shuffling into the maws of the Morlach's for dinner--as the main course--comes frequently to mind.

The main stream media lobotomizing of the masses is incredibly effective.

a reply to: BO XIAN

A “dirty bomb” is a conventional explosive, such as dynamite, salted with radioactive waste that scatters when the bomb goes off. It is not a nuclear bomb. The bomb can kill or injure through the initial blast of the conventional explosive and through the dispersal of the radioactive materials– hence the term “dirty.” Such bombs could be small devices or as big as a truck bomb.

The radiation exposure is the blast radius and the prevailing wind, water runoff and air currents.

The public became aware of a Russian nuclear device they had not known even existed–the “suitcase bomb”. One of these portable nuclear bombs had an explosive charge of one kiloton, equivalent to one thousand tons of TNT. If a device like this made its way to the U.S. it could destroy everything within a half-mile radius of the Capitol in Washington, D.C. Within hours, prevailing winds would carry the nuclear fallout throughout Washington.

A "low yield" is less than one kiloton.

This information is from a threat report published about 5 years ago, this was taken from the nukepills site page. I believe it can also be found in the military NBC manuals online, from more detailed information on threats and procedures.

A "high yield is anything greater than one kiloton.

a reply to: LamontCranston

Thanks.

I was counting on someone like you giving us the solid info on those issues.

a reply to: BO XIAN
A security specialist in Singapore told me the worst issues with a dirty bomb is not the initial blast and cleanup, but the panic and long term cleanup. You will keep finding high amounts of radioactivity for years in spots the you thought had been cleaned. And the panic situation is understandable, even the hint of another bomb will probably set off a panic.

a reply to: LamontCranston

Sounds about right, to me.

Thanks.

We've been hearing this kind of stuff for awhile.

Although, there is some credibility to the radiated elements being stolen, they pretty much always get caught. In fact iirc, some of those thefts were by accident while they were trying to steal medical equipment.

a reply to: BO XIAN

But wait!! Wouldn't the Oligarchy be in control of the National Labs that produce Nukes? So why would they have to design a porous border to sneak them in. They can just order up those suckers from Los Alamos eh?

Dude sometimes one just gets wrapped around the axle of one's own conspiracy theory. It will be OK! Relax! Everything is under control

a reply to: BO XIAN

But wait!! Wouldn't the Oligarchy be in control of the National Labs that produce Nukes? So why would they have to design a porous border to sneak them in. They can just order up those suckers from Los Alamos eh?

Dude sometimes one just gets wrapped around the axle of one's own conspiracy theory. It will be OK! Relax! Everything is under control

What is this obsession with trying to make stories about bringing things up from Mexico. The Mexico/US border is the most secure we have and far more secure than at anytime in our history most which had few hundred border patrol members now at 26,000. We have a massive coast lines where you can land anywhere not to mention just flying in. In our history that is how terrorist have gotten here. They just fly in. Or come over the Canadian border nobody is patrolling that massive thing. Coming over the southern border is the hardest way to get something in.