how come we dont have a real photo of earth?

originally posted by: clevargenuis

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: clevargenuis

AHA so nasa never made it high enough to photograph earth?!

The Moon is quite a bit "higher" than the ISS.

lmao the moon landing is questionable but I'll save it for a different topic

I can hardly wait.

originally posted by: clevargenuis

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: clevargenuis

AHA so nasa never made it high enough to photograph earth?!

The Moon is quite a bit "higher" than the ISS.

lmao the moon landing is questionable but I'll save it for a different topic

What is your topic even about? You've said and had evidence for nothing. 7 pages of you repeating yourself.

originally posted by: clevargenuis

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: clevargenuis

originally posted by: choos

originally posted by: clevargenuis
maps are a different story. I'm just asking for an actual photo of earth. they can give us hi res photos of friggin pluto but dont have the tech to give us an actual photo of earth roflmao

no its the same thing..

maps are meant to be real, so that we can read them to know where we are!!

photo of the earth and a map are two very different things.

Try harder. Why does NASA rely on compositing and photoshoppery?

Because the ISS is only 400 miles up. From 400 miles away, the Earth fills pretty much the entire sky looking in that direction. To fit it all means we have to either stitch a panorama or use a fisheye lens (or both).

AHA so nasa never made it high enough to photograph earth?!

Sure, they took a great photo of the Earth rising over the lunar horizon a few times, but they had contrast problems with the lunar surface so they had to mess with the image, so you'd probably say that it is fake, 'cause adjusting contrast = faking, doesn't it.

Did you know that there are colors (at about 490nM Wavelength) that your eye is unable to see but your brain processing infers them. Everything you see is fake. Everything.

originally posted by: clevargenuis

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: clevargenuis

2. You dont need to be a photographer to see that north america keeps changing sizes even wheb shot from the same angle.
3. create aesthetically pleasing images? I thought thats hollywoods job? oh wait....

# 2 That doesn't mean they are shot from the same camera and the same distance, on every picture.

# 3 They sometimes do it to exclude cloud cover.

#2. Continents shouldnt change sizes in photos

#3. so what if clouds are seen? why cant nasa give us an authentic photo, clouds or no clouds?

Can you please link to this so-called image that has 'sex' on it? Because right now we're all pointing and giggling.

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: clevargenuis

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: clevargenuis

2. You dont need to be a photographer to see that north america keeps changing sizes even wheb shot from the same angle.
3. create aesthetically pleasing images? I thought thats hollywoods job? oh wait....

# 2 That doesn't mean they are shot from the same camera and the same distance, on every picture.

# 3 They sometimes do it to exclude cloud cover.

#2. Continents shouldnt change sizes in photos

#3. so what if clouds are seen? why cant nasa give us an authentic photo, clouds or no clouds?

Can you please link to this so-called image that has 'sex' on it? Because right now we're all pointing and giggling.

Nope. You'll have to "google it."
Op doesn't do his job for you, for crying out loud.

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: clevargenuis

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: clevargenuis

2. You dont need to be a photographer to see that north america keeps changing sizes even wheb shot from the same angle.
3. create aesthetically pleasing images? I thought thats hollywoods job? oh wait....

# 2 That doesn't mean they are shot from the same camera and the same distance, on every picture.

# 3 They sometimes do it to exclude cloud cover.

#2. Continents shouldnt change sizes in photos

#3. so what if clouds are seen? why cant nasa give us an authentic photo, clouds or no clouds?

Can you please link to this so-called image that has 'sex' on it? .

i.ytimg.com...

Now go on, deny that it spells out S-E-X.

thecoincidencetheorist.com...

Lmao. Here.

a reply to: clevargenuis

Yea! A picture. Finally.


Where does it say SEX?

a reply to: Joecanada11

Nope, i'm as real as you or anyone else can see, i just don't accept BS as much as others here. If someone pretends to have 'actual' knowledge about anything and specially when they clearly learned it from somewhere else they have to share it, no 'butIreadsomuchandispentsomuchtimegolearnyourselfalsoIcantbewrong' anything.

Talk about wasting the entire scientific method giving ridiculous 'you're wrong because i said so and i know everything' answers. I'm tired of wiki-google-scientists that make bad use of knowledge to make themselves look all knowing at stuff.

I'm sorry if it offends you but i don't have any respect for people like that. And that's that.

a reply to: chr0naut

the earth photo taken from the "moon" is also questionable. the fact that you dont see stars gives it away.

the "moon" itself looks like a B-movie set roflmao

originally posted by: clevargenuis

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: clevargenuis

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: clevargenuis

2. You dont need to be a photographer to see that north america keeps changing sizes even wheb shot from the same angle.
3. create aesthetically pleasing images? I thought thats hollywoods job? oh wait....

# 2 That doesn't mean they are shot from the same camera and the same distance, on every picture.

# 3 They sometimes do it to exclude cloud cover.

#2. Continents shouldnt change sizes in photos

#3. so what if clouds are seen? why cant nasa give us an authentic photo, clouds or no clouds?

Can you please link to this so-called image that has 'sex' on it? .

i.ytimg.com...

Now go on, deny that it spells out S-E-X.

seeing the word sex from that image reminds me of the Rorschach test

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: clevargenuis

Yea! A picture. Finally.


Where does it say SEX?

thecoincidencetheorist.com...

like i said, go on and deny that it says "SEX".

a reply to: clevargenuis
Yep. Someone wrote SEX there alright.
In big red letters. Awesome photoshop skilz

a reply to: choos

Youre just denying the obvious. Its right in front of you.

but of course, the whole image is FAKE so the word sex isnt the biggest concern

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: clevargenuis
Yep. Someone wrote SEX there alright.
In big red letters. Awesome photoshop skilz

I'm sure NASA could use those skills.

originally posted by: clevargenuis
a reply to: choos

Youre just denying the obvious. Its right in front of you.

but of course, the whole image is FAKE so the word sex isnt the biggest concern

been a while has it?

originally posted by: clevargenuis

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: clevargenuis
Yep. Someone wrote SEX there alright.
In big red letters. Awesome photoshop skilz

I'm sure NASA could use those skills.

Go look up the word 'gullible'.

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: clevargenuis

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: clevargenuis
Yep. Someone wrote SEX there alright.
In big red letters. Awesome photoshop skilz

I'm sure NASA could use those skills.

Go look up the word 'gullible'.

I did!
It's not in the dictionary!

a reply to: clevargenuis

Please. What is this about? Is it about us ever being I'm space? It honestly can't be about a picture that you say has sex wrote in it.

a reply to: StolidPanda

Is it about us ever being I'm space?

And/or the Earth being flat.