It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

how come we dont have a real photo of earth?

page: 6
5
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 1 2016 @ 01:35 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

no i am saying that the "real" photo of earth that came out last year could easily be stitched and faked and no one can prove anything either way, have you not considered this?




posted on May, 1 2016 @ 01:36 AM
link   
a reply to: DOCHOLIDAZE1
Wait a second...
Ok.
Yes, I have.


Tell me, do you think that the Earth is flat or that no people or instruments have been in space?

edit on 5/1/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 1 2016 @ 01:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: SmurfRider

Looks sort of funny in other ways, too.
blog.richmond.edu...



originally posted by: choos

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: choos




how can i be sure that my location is really my location without a REAL MAP?!?!?!?! the world is a LIE im telling you BRUH



Wait. I just spread my map out on my table. It's flat!


mind officialy BLOWN


^ I couldn't say it any better
edit on 1-5-2016 by SmurfRider because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 1 2016 @ 01:39 AM
link   
a reply to: SmurfRider
It is not a fake map.
en.wikipedia.org...

The world is flat and the continents change shape.


edit on 5/1/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 1 2016 @ 01:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

I never said any of these things, but nice try Phage.

What I believe is no one can know anything for sure until it they experience it for themselves,

kind of like how many atheists big argument is ive never seen or heard God therefore it is not real.

its weird how faith works in everything humans do, even science.





posted on May, 1 2016 @ 01:47 AM
link   
a reply to: DOCHOLIDAZE1




What I believe is no one can know anything for sure until it they experience it for themselves,

Yeah. Well. I know base jumping wing suit fliers are nuts. I don't have to do it to know that.



posted on May, 1 2016 @ 01:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DOCHOLIDAZE1




What I believe is no one can know anything for sure until it they experience it for themselves,

Yeah. Well. I know base jumping wing suit fliers are nuts. I don't have to do it to know that.


But BASE jumping is like the perfect mixture of faith & science!



posted on May, 1 2016 @ 01:48 AM
link   
a reply to: SmurfRider

Yeah.
And it's nuts.



posted on May, 1 2016 @ 01:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: choos

originally posted by: clevargenuis
maps are a different story. I'm just asking for an actual photo of earth. they can give us hi res photos of friggin pluto but dont have the tech to give us an actual photo of earth roflmao


no its the same thing..

maps are meant to be real, so that we can read them to know where we are!!



photo of the earth and a map are two very different things.

Try harder. Why does NASA rely on compositing and photoshoppery?



posted on May, 1 2016 @ 01:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: DOCHOLIDAZE1
a reply to: Phage

no i am saying that the "real" photo of earth that came out last year could easily be stitched and faked and no one can prove anything either way, have you not considered this?


According to nasa fanboys "if its from nasa it must be true".



posted on May, 1 2016 @ 01:57 AM
link   
a reply to: clevargenuis




Why does NASA rely on compositing and photoshoppery?

Why do you say NASA relies on compositing and photoshoppery?
You know that there are many forms of data which NASA utilizes, many of which have nothing to do with visual imagery.



posted on May, 1 2016 @ 01:58 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

no that is some crazy stuff, luckily they see and experience what it is to fold a parachute which validates their faith, that they probably wont die.

i just wonder what would happen if they hit a bird



posted on May, 1 2016 @ 01:58 AM
link   
a reply to: clevargenuis




According to nasa fanboys "if its from nasa it must be true".

Funny. I can't see where anyone has said that here. That is what is called a strawman argument. It is a logical fallacy.
en.wikipedia.org...

On the other hand, I can't see where you have said what your point is or what evidence you have provided to support it.



posted on May, 1 2016 @ 01:59 AM
link   
a reply to: DOCHOLIDAZE1
That would depend. European or African bird?



posted on May, 1 2016 @ 02:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

i was thinking Antarctic



posted on May, 1 2016 @ 02:00 AM
link   
Apollo 11 photography of Earth: www.youtube.com...



Image archive: www.hq.nasa.gov...





~~~

Mods - this thread is ripe for being moved into Skunkworks or Hoax forums, as it's really not getting anywhere and just wastes everybody's time.
edit on 1-5-2016 by wildespace because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 1 2016 @ 02:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: clevargenuis




Why does NASA rely on compositing and photoshoppery?

Why do you say NASA relies on compositing and photoshoppery?
You know that there are many forms of data which NASA utilizes, many of which have nothing to do with visual imagery.




as far as earth images are concerned nasa relies on photoshop/CGI.

you wouldnt trust a news agency that habitually shows you fake photoshopped images, so why do you trust NASA?



posted on May, 1 2016 @ 02:02 AM
link   
a reply to: DOCHOLIDAZE1
Yikes.
Hitting a penguin would be a bad thing for a wing suit pilot.



posted on May, 1 2016 @ 02:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: wildespace
Apollo 11 photography of Earth: www.youtube.com...



Image archive: www.hq.nasa.gov...

~~~

Mods - this thread is ripe for being moved into Skunkworks or Hoax forums, as it's really not getting anywhere and just wastes everybody's time.


i know its getting a little hot in here for nasa defendants but why trash the thread? its only gonna prove my point lmao



posted on May, 1 2016 @ 02:06 AM
link   
a reply to: clevargenuis




i know its getting a little hot in here for nasa defendants but why trash the thread? its only gonna prove my point lmao

You're new here.
Certain forums have different parameters. It so happens that you have posted in a science forum. In this forum it is acceptable to ask for evidence for claims.

There are other forums which are not as...picky. So, if you don't like being asked for evidence, one of those forums would be more appropriate.
Your thread would not be trashed, it would be properly situated.

edit on 5/1/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
5
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join