University of Alaska Fairbanks Professor Launches New 9/11 Research Project

If that doesn't work. Claim the government forced individuals / institutions to lose data, change data, destroy evidence, fake research, produce erroneous reports so lies are on paper, or just rightout lie?

originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: hellobruce

You won't get a reply from our lost in space doctor or should that be lost in facts. When he is shown to be wrong he changes subject

But where is your Official story list? Complain endlessly but have nothing to offer.


A lot of the individuals on the last list aren't professors but most are highly educated. Most don't want to put their names in public because they will lose their jobs. Not enough integrity anymore in the States if their ever was any.

originally posted by: Doctor Smith

originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: hellobruce

You won't get a reply from our lost in space doctor or should that be lost in facts. When he is shown to be wrong he changes subject

But where is your Official story list? Complain endlessly but have nothing to offer.


A lot of the individuals on the last list aren't professors but most are highly educated. Most don't want to put their names in public because they will lose their jobs. Not enough integrity anymore in the States if their ever was any.

So you lied? That seems to be your theme.

"75 top professors and leading scientists claim 9/11 was ‘inside job’" was a bold faced lie.

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Doctor Smith

originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: hellobruce

You won't get a reply from our lost in space doctor or should that be lost in facts. When he is shown to be wrong he changes subject

But where is your Official story list? Complain endlessly but have nothing to offer.


A lot of the individuals on the last list aren't professors but most are highly educated. Most don't want to put their names in public because they will lose their jobs. Not enough integrity anymore in the States if their ever was any.

So you lied? That seems to be your theme.

"75 top professors and leading scientists claim 9/11 was ‘inside job’" was a bold faced lie.

No. That was the title of the website. You have listed 0 Professors. LOL

And your trying to change the subject. You think If their is crude ingredients of thermite in the building it will magically construct itself into nano themite if the building is destroyed. You and the rest of your kind have no idea what your talking about. At best.

originally posted by: Doctor Smith

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Doctor Smith

originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: hellobruce

You won't get a reply from our lost in space doctor or should that be lost in facts. When he is shown to be wrong he changes subject

But where is your Official story list? Complain endlessly but have nothing to offer.


A lot of the individuals on the last list aren't professors but most are highly educated. Most don't want to put their names in public because they will lose their jobs. Not enough integrity anymore in the States if their ever was any.

So you lied? That seems to be your theme.

"75 top professors and leading scientists claim 9/11 was ‘inside job’" was a bold faced lie.

No. That was the title of the website. You have listed 0 Professors. LOL

You were asked about all the professors YOU said were against the os. YOU then posted that rubbish that was an out and out lie.

And your trying to change the subject.

YOU posted it as "evidence", yet you accuse me of changing the subject??

You think If their is crude ingredients of thermite in the building it will magically construct itself into nano themite if the building is destroyed.

Crude ingredients? No, they're the ACTUAL ingredients needed. Do some research for once.

You and the rest of your kind have no idea what your talking about. At best.

Says the dude on an Internet forum that uses lies as evidence?

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
A lot of the individuals on the last list aren't professors but most are highly educated.

Yet you have zero evidence for that claim, just like all the other claims you make! funny that, do you see a pattern?

Most don't want to put their names in public because they will lose their jobs.

Why will they lose their jobs?

I'm not going to fault the doctor for the 75 professors.
One because it was the title of the article.

But it does show quite clearly that these so called experts for the truther side are not experts.
Just because someone gets a degree that doesn't mean they are and expert on everything.

Just how many experts in the required fields agree with the conspiracy side ?
Not many.
Even then how many examined the evidence first hand?
None.
Even the much touted Richard Gage is not an expert in the required fields.
Yet he speaks like he has all the answers.
In fact he talks out of both sides of his mouth.
"Thermite was used to quietly bring down the towers."
"Explosives were used to propel steels beams at 60 mph."

a reply to: Doctor Smith

Do YOU actually know what a professor is

They hold a university chair or are a head of a department.

What does someone with a degree in say economics know about building construction or structural design, probably the same as you Sweet FA.

These are the two most well known. Chemistry and Physics would be the most qualified in my opinion.

Dr. Niels Harrit is the Associate Professor for Chemistry at the Copenhagen University in Denmark, and a globally recognized scientist who has published various scientific papers. He was part of the scientific team which discovered nanothermite in samples of dust from the 9/11 W.T.C attacks, and since then has had his credibility attacked.

Steven E. Jones
A Physics Professor


A professor is a high ranking teacher at a University or Colledge. Here's some more that think the official story is a load. You guys should know that there are endless educated individuals that don't buy The Official Story.

Professors Question the 9/11 Commission Report

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
He was part of the scientific team which discovered nanothermite in samples of dust from the 9/11 W.T.C attacks,

No he did not actually, that is just a truther made up story. No thermite was found.

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
He was part of the scientific team which discovered nanothermite in samples of dust from the 9/11 W.T.C attacks,

No he did not actually, that is just a truther made up story. No thermite was found.

Actually he did. And you have failed to supply any evidence to the contrary.

Look at this one! Wow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Endless!

S.P.I.N.E.: The Scientific Panel Investigating Nine-Eleven Members List

a reply to: Doctor Smith

Here's some more that think the official story is a load.

Do you even bother to read some of their credentials ?
The very first one !

Professor Emeritus, Department of Computer Science,
Says " debris found outside the Pentagon is inconsistent with the impact of a Boeing 757"
Would you call him to investigate an air crash ?

Distinguished American mathematician.
Says "The "official" reports are not believable."
Would you call him to investigate a building collapse ?

Professor Emeritus, Agricultural and Irrigation Engineering
Says "Obviously it was the result of controlled demolition"
Try calling him as an expert witness on CD.

You have got to start looking at these hoax believers field of expertise.
The next time you get a tooth ache call . . .
James R. Carr, PhD, PE – Professor, Department of Geological Sciences and Engineering,
Wait . . are you saying he doesn't have the expertise to pull a tooth ???

Get your head out of the conspiracy mud and see just who's flinging the poo.

a reply to: Doctor Smith

Look at this one! Wow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Endless!

You didn't even read your own link.
Sad . . . .

Kevin Barrett
Lone Rock, WI, USA PhD U of Wisconsin
Islamic Studies

A real expert in physics isn't he.

Leo Fouseki
Riverview, FL, USA MA U of Liverpool
Economic Modeling

Yep another one that doesn't know which end of a screw driver to hold.

Annie Higgins
Gainesville, FL, USA PhD University of Chicago
Arabic Language & Literature

Just what does she have to do with physics ?????

originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Here's some more that think the official story is a load.

Do you even bother to read some of their credentials ?
The very first one !

Professor Emeritus, Department of Computer Science,
Says " debris found outside the Pentagon is inconsistent with the impact of a Boeing 757"
Would you call him to investigate an air crash ?

Distinguished American mathematician.
Says "The "official" reports are not believable."
Would you call him to investigate a building collapse ?

Professor Emeritus, Agricultural and Irrigation Engineering
Says "Obviously it was the result of controlled demolition"
Try calling him as an expert witness on CD.

You have got to start looking at these hoax believers field of expertise.
The next time you get a tooth ache call . . .
James R. Carr, PhD, PE – Professor, Department of Geological Sciences and Engineering,
Wait . . are you saying he doesn't have the expertise to pull a tooth ???

Get your head out of the conspiracy mud and see just who's flinging the poo.

Actually none of those even need to be specialist at any of those things because even children can understand most of what the official story tellers say is completely fabricated cow crap. And the government already has a proven track record of hiring panels with university affiliations to make up a report that only favors the government. This has been going on for centuries in other countries, and the USA joined right in on that since it works so well against those who are afraid to question government. The only problem with doing that in the USA is that most of us that can discern when the government is lying far outnumber the weak minded who fear government.

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Which truther camp is right? Controlled explosive demolitions with no recorded sound of exploding charges at WTC? Quiet thermite narrative to make up for no evidence of blasting charges. Nuke bomb? No contamination from fission products. Again, no audio of a nuke bomb setting off. Missiles with holograms? No physical evidence of any if those items found while thousands of bone fragments recovered. So now its lassers and energy beams due to no physical evidence. Dr Wood based a book how the WTC buildings were not brought down by explosives or by thermite, but energy waves. Mmmmm fire provides heat energy. Truthers are slowly getting to the truth fire brought down the buildings at the WTC.....

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

No what the IDIOTIC Truther side need to realise is if it were a demo job STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS would say so in their thousands and don't give us the usual conspiracy BS about being killed/losing jobs do you think they could do that to them all.

If brain's were explosives the truthers wouldn't have enough to blow their nose.

originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

No what the IDIOTIC Truther side need to realise is if it were a demo job STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS would say so in their thousands and don't give us the usual conspiracy BS about being killed/losing jobs do you think they could do that to them all.

If brain's were explosives the truthers wouldn't have enough to blow their nose.

When you resort to profane ridicule like you do, it just makes you look desperate and weak.

Desperate and weak.

A fitting combination for government worshipers.

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

When you resort to profane ridicule like you do, it just makes you look desperate and weak.

Actually not.
There comes a point when you have to call out the craziness.

There are only a small handful of people with expertise that are saying conspiracy.
Compared with the hundreds of thousands of experts around the world who believe the OS.

When 'truthers' tout Phd's in Theology as experts they should be called out.

For years some have claimed that the truth movement is growing and the majority of people believe 911 is a conspiracy.
If that were true there would be press coverage like black lives matter gets.
Even on here the postings have dropped.
There seems to be only a few who post regularly.
IMO things changed in peoples minds when 2012 came and went.
It's like people realized there's not a conspiracy under every bush.

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

No it shows I don't appreciate fools