It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

University of Alaska Fairbanks Professor Launches New 9/11 Research Project

page: 25
44
<< 22  23  24    26  27  28 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 3 2016 @ 06:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
And no verified audio recording of charges being set off. And you need to stop contradicting your arguments. Thermite was used because explosives were too noisy yet you have explosions caused by demolitions on recorded audio? Which is it. Silent thermite or noisy demolitions? Again, one camp of truthers speculation discredited by another camp of truthers speculation.


It was scientifically proven that advanced thermate (similar to the type NIST had helped developed and new all about) was used. That doesn't mean they couldn't have used other types of explosives. And a fast burning type of advanced thermite could have been used as an explosive also. It depends on how it is contained. A few people don't speak for us all.
edit on 3-6-2016 by Doctor Smith because: (no reason given)

edit on 3-6-2016 by Doctor Smith because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 3 2016 @ 06:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
It was scientifically proven that advanced thermate (similar to the type NIST had helped developed and new all about) was used.


Wrong again, that is not a fact at all, just something published in a "pay to publish journal" that was not peer reviewed at all. You obviously do not know what peer reviewed even means! Also the editor resigned as they did not even know it they had taken the money and published it!



posted on Jun, 3 2016 @ 06:40 PM
link   
I just hope this Dr. is near retirement.

This is NOT a career move for him


They will ruin him very quickly



posted on Jun, 3 2016 @ 07:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
It was scientifically proven that advanced thermate (similar to the type NIST had helped developed and new all about) was used.


Wrong again, that is not a fact at all, just something published in a "pay to publish journal" that was not peer reviewed at all. You obviously do not know what peer reviewed even means! Also the editor resigned as they did not even know it they had taken the money and published it!


Jones is waiting to be challenged by a peer reviewed rebuttal. That's how science is suppose to work. But so far the would be debunkers have wimped out. The just try and slander Jones. Really pathetic.



posted on Jun, 3 2016 @ 07:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
Jones is waiting to be challenged by a peer reviewed rebuttal. That's how science is suppose to work.


First he has to get his "paper" peer reviewed, he apparently is unable to do even that!



posted on Jun, 3 2016 @ 07:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Doctor Smith

originally posted by: neutronflux
And no verified audio recording of charges being set off. And you need to stop contradicting your arguments. Thermite was used because explosives were too noisy yet you have explosions caused by demolitions on recorded audio? Which is it. Silent thermite or noisy demolitions? Again, one camp of truthers speculation discredited by another camp of truthers speculation.


It was scientifically proven that advanced thermate (similar to the type NIST had helped developed and new all about) was used. That doesn't mean they couldn't have used other types of explosives. And a fast burning type of advanced thermite could have been used as an explosive also. It depends on how it is contained. A few people don't speak for us all.


Show us the research that found all the needed items to show thermite was used. Especially the research that found the aluminum needed to prove thermite was used. Then we agree there was no explosions due to demolitions and you just debunked any video with explosion audio.



posted on Jun, 3 2016 @ 07:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Doctor Smith

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
a reply to: hellobruce

Sorry Bruce. Even NIST said it was unlikely. Their wasn't enough fuel to find a broken shaft and go down 1700 ft. Even under the worst circumstances. More likely the elevators were blown up by bombs to keep as many victims in the building as possible.



Top floor of the towers was 1350 feet. You were only off by more than 21%.

Who is desperate. Controlled demo is only a narritive backed by what college or university? Based on what physical evidence? Bless those that found thousands of fragmented remains, yet no trace of explosives.


It was actually 1,175 feet. I guess I left out the 1 and rounded it to 1700. Still very far down, over a thousand feet. It is possible that the jet fuel could have caused some of the explosions. The important thing is the vapor.

That's an important difference between the High Road Truthers and the OFS backers. The truthers are looking for the actual truth. They will admit when a minor mistake is made.


You were not off. You wanted to exaggerate using the total building hight. Hoping we would fall for it. Classic truther disinfomation...... 1700 was a typo for 1175? 1234567890?

789
456
123?



posted on Jun, 3 2016 @ 07:54 PM
link   
Have fun debunking these papers. Maybe you can challenge the authors on ATS?

www.jod911.com...



posted on Jun, 3 2016 @ 08:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Doctor Smith


Who did that the man that claimed Jesus hsd visited the USA.



posted on Jun, 4 2016 @ 05:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: Doctor Smith

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
It was scientifically proven that advanced thermate (similar to the type NIST had helped developed and new all about) was used.


Wrong again, that is not a fact at all, just something published in a "pay to publish journal" that was not peer reviewed at all. You obviously do not know what peer reviewed even means! Also the editor resigned as they did not even know it they had taken the money and published it!


Jones is waiting to be challenged by a peer reviewed rebuttal. That's how science is suppose to work. But so far the would be debunkers have wimped out. The just try and slander Jones. Really pathetic.


Jones work gets reviewed often and not to your liking.
truthersaresanitychallenged.wordpress.com...

And I have also stated Jones will not releases his dust for others to analyze. Other people have studied WTC dust with a clear chain of custody and compared their results to Jones. Jones work has been peered reviewed. To say otherwise is disinformation.



posted on Jun, 4 2016 @ 07:55 AM
link   
These people are nutty and flat wrong, but truthers contradicting truthers. (Evidence based only on elements. No proof of actually radioactive isotopes of the elements or radioactive contamination greater than background. Remember, the bombs would have resulted in distinct fission products. Not random stable atoms.) Which ones work as disinfomationalist for the government? I guess Jones is a distraction. A nuclear physicist to distract the truther narritive nukes were used. Are you part of the lie?

www.veteranstoday.com...
edit on 4-6-2016 by neutronflux because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 4 2016 @ 09:22 AM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

Thank you for that link to Veterans Today, that was an excellent analysis of the evidence for the nuclear theory.

I agree that Steven Jones is not being completely honest, and his credentials as a nuclear expert makes that rather troublesome.



posted on Jun, 4 2016 @ 11:55 AM
link   
a reply to: Salander




I agree that Steven Jones is not being completely honest, and his credentials as a nuclear expert makes that rather troublesome.

When you add Richard Gage into the mix of credentials and honesty the whole conspiracy foundation starts to crumble.



posted on Jun, 4 2016 @ 07:23 PM
link   
a reply to: samkent

This is just pure information. Started to type Richard Gage into Google and before I finished, one of Google's top five suggestions was Richard Gage salary. Does that indicate lots of interest on what he makes from the non for profit?



posted on Jun, 5 2016 @ 06:40 PM
link   
So the best that can be done is claim. Jones has nuclear credentials so he has to ignore the science and automatically claim nuclear bombs were used. And then ignore the Nano thermate proven to be in the dust samples. LOL What a joke.

And then if someone claims nuclear. The same dunces will attack whoever claims nuclear. Yawn.



posted on Jun, 5 2016 @ 09:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Ever produce evidence of aluminum in the dust?



posted on Jun, 5 2016 @ 11:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Ever produce evidence of aluminum in the dust?


Yes. Look at this video at 38 minutes. Of course.




posted on Jun, 5 2016 @ 11:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Doctor Smith

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Ever produce evidence of aluminum in the dust?


Yes. Look at this video at 38 minutes. Of course.



What paper states aluminum was found? And was it aluminum oxide?



posted on Jun, 5 2016 @ 11:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Willtell
I just hope this Dr. is near retirement.

This is NOT a career move for him


They will ruin him very quickly


He didn't want to retire but the university probably gets grant money so he had to go. I think he will be ok. No good deed goes unpunished. Do gooders don't keep their jobs long in America.



posted on Jun, 6 2016 @ 12:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: Doctor Smith

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Ever produce evidence of aluminum in the dust?


Yes. Look at this video at 38 minutes. Of course.



What paper states aluminum was found? And was it aluminum oxide?


When the red-grey chips are activated they produce iron-aluminum sphere's just like the ones in the dust. And put out more energy than known nano thermate. Before they are activated they have aluminum among other required thermate material.

Paint chips cannot ignite. And could not produce enough heat for the metal sphere's to be produced. Look at the video yourself.




top topics



 
44
<< 22  23  24    26  27  28 >>

log in

join