posted on Apr, 18 2016 @ 06:17 PM
a reply to: jhill76
So if the preacher is wrong and the bible is wrong, how do we know what is right? Why god at all? Didn't we declare the bible to be untrue just now?
Or are only selective parts of it wrong? Well which parts? Too many inconsistencies.
It's cryptic speak like yours that gets the gullible, but I demand concrete answers. I want evidence and all the of the many inconsistencies and
impossibilities are cleared up I cannot accept its existence. The ultimate being the circular logic of how god's existence can be confirmed in the
bible which is true because this very god said so.
I am, however, willing to entertain the possibility of an unknown and indescribable force out there, possibly intelligent, that we don't know about.
Maybe it even is this god of yours. I just want physical proof of existence before I believe in first though. Not words and feelings.
WHY does this remain the one thing that is too much to ask for from your god? People have been talking and talking and talking for thousands of years
about god and his existence, but this ONE thing that would solve ALL of that, god refuses to indulge in to his creations that he supposedly loves and
cherishes deeply. I mean what's so damn hard about a, "Hey what's up guys? It's me god. Yeah. I still exist. Don't forget about me. K. Bye!" every
once in a while?
And don't give me anything about god presenting himself to people (believers) all the time. If god can do anything, he should know EXACTLY what kind
of evidence would be required to satisfy any disbelievers. But hey, forget the disbelievers, how about all the holy wars? He could totally put a stop
to all the mindless killing in his name. Especially since all THREE of the religions that worship said god are at each other's throats near
constantly. A simple. "Hey, uh guys.... *points at a specific religion* that one. That's the one I want you to follow. Remember! I still exist! K.
Bye!" would suffice. He could maybe throw in a few emojis. Depends on how he is feeling that century.
edit on 18-4-2016 by Krazysh0t because:
(no reason given)