It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
California Congressman Darrell Issa, who previously led an investigation into Benghazi as former chairman of the House Oversight Committee, says the FBI "would like to indict both Huma [Abedin] and Hillary Clinton" for conducting sensitive government business on an unsecure, private email server.
"I think the FBI director would like to indict both Huma and Hillary as we speak," the Republican heavyweight told the Washington Examiner Thursday, during a debate watch-party at Florida Sen. Marco Rubio's New Hampshire campaign headquarters.
"I think he's in a position where he's being forced to triple-time make a case of what would otherwise be, what they call, a slam dunk," Issa said, referring to FBI Director James Comey, who previously told the Senate Judiciary Committee he would conduct a "competent," "honest" and "independent" probe into Clinton's handling of classified information during her tenure as secretary of state.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Josh Earnest just said Hillary is not a target of the investigation.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Josh Earnest just said Hillary is not a target of the investigation.
Josh Earnest?
Where does he tend bar?
Oh yeah he's the White House Press Secretary that's right I forgot for a moment.
He's just spreading the Hillary Campaign propaganda again.
originally posted by: Glinda
a reply to: xuenchen
I'm guessing Bernie Sanders is seriously regretting his "support" of Hillary saying there was "no wrong doing" in her email debacle.
Electroinically it can be determined how/when her server was compromised and that is what is stirring this. They know who "got in" and when. She was receiving cut and pasted emails (the cut being the subject line--the one noting "top secret access only") to skirt the issue (why?) and receiving the info on her private, yet shared with the Clinton Foundation, server. This isn't an "ooopsy" didn't want to carry two devices (I still don't get that lame excuse) this was an intentional avoidance of Federal law with Top Secret information going to the same governments that the Clinton Foundation was interacting with (speaking fees). People have gone to jail for much, much less.
You can bet your A$$, lots of our most closely held secrets were sold for big money.