It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Seede
a reply to: Marduk
Producing silly giant bones was not the premise of this thread. The premise of this thread was your silly bashing Christians with your stupid premise of proving the KJV bible wrong. That was the entire purpose of your ill thought rant.
On page seven I told you that I would produce your giant bones if you would first produce your proof of the KJV bible being translated wrong. You would not answer my request which was in direct demand to your added silly giant bones.
edit on Mon Dec 7 2015 by DontTreadOnMe because: Community Announcement re: Decorum
originally posted by: texastig
a reply to: Marduk
The Bed of Og debunks your claims.
jbq.jewishbible.org...
He was deified and given the role of a protector of tombs,
and possibly functioned as the local deity of Rabbath Ammon. The huge eres (bed)
displayed there could be understood as a ceremonial bed, a cultic object indicating
his presence
originally posted by: Marduk
a reply to: Seede
a reply to: JackReyes
Ok. so what you are saying is, apart from all the irrelevant waffle, which has nothing to do with the premise of this thread at all
IS THAT NEITHER OF YOU CAN PRODUCE A SINGLE GIANT BONE
despite me asking you several times and you both ignoring the request
Get out of the thread until you can back up your assertions with evidence gentlemen, this isn't your soapbox
originally posted by: JackReyes
a reply to: Seede
No just because the accuracy of the later extent codexes and scrolls are verifiable does not mean that the rest of the Dead Sea Scrolls were part of God's inspired word. In order to be so they have to be consistent with the whole Biblical texts, harmonizing with the contents therein.
There were indeed many other works, but none of them claimed to be inspired, and some even contradict the Biblical narrative, such as the Book of Enoch, an apocryphal book, which rightly does not claim a place in the Bible cannon.
But I believe we're all getting widely off topic. I just came in to give the OP my understanding that there is sufficient proof of there being giants in the Bible, not whether all the Dead Sea Scrolls were divinely inspired (which obviously they weren't all inspired, even if they were preserved in tact in the caves near the Dead Sea for two thousand years or so.)
Even when Solomon was alive, almost a thousand years before Christ he mentioned that there was a dedication to making of many books. So even in his day books abounded. And his conclusion was, that a dedication to all of them is wearisome to the flesh:
(Ecclesiastes 12:12) 12 As for anything besides these, my son, be warned: To the making of many books there is no end, and much devotion to them is wearisome to the flesh.
So we should not be surprised to find other religious and secular works in history that are not divinely inspired.
ETA:
I read the post above mine and it appears that we are getting booted from the thread by the OP. I don't want to overstay my welcome so I'm outta here. Nice conversation.
originally posted by: Rapha
When the 'giants' or old 'men of renown' lower their camouflage and allow mankind to see them face to face, its going to be quite a laugh watching people running for their lives.
Especially when the Rephaim or 'Eternally Dead' show their true forms.
People just won't know what to do when they see 7ft tall wraiths and banshees drifting through their neighbourhood.
originally posted by: Harte
The ignorant, in order to remain so, comment without reading or thinking about what has already been posted in this thread.
To wit, the word "giant" didn't mean particularly large at the time. The origin of the word shows this to be true.
Also, the KJV is not the original Bible, and the Nag Hammadi "library" paints God as the enemy. Unlikely He inspired that.
Harte
originally posted by: CapstonePendulum
originally posted by: Harte
The ignorant, in order to remain so, comment without reading or thinking about what has already been posted in this thread.
To wit, the word "giant" didn't mean particularly large at the time. The origin of the word shows this to be true.
Also, the KJV is not the original Bible, and the Nag Hammadi "library" paints God as the enemy. Unlikely He inspired that.
Harte
The Nag Hammadi scriptures do not paint God in a negative image. The Hebrew bible does that.
God in the NHL is unknowable and called Innefable Aeon, Majesty and other things.
Your assumption that Jehovah is God is an assumption and the bible makes him look like a sociopath. Did God inspire that or humans?
Where the bible paints God as evil the NHL rejects that Jehovah is God. Is it wrong to believe that God is good and that Jesus is not Jehovah's son?
Not according to Jesus who calls the God of the Jews the father of lies and a murderer. They didn't worship Satan so I think you know nothing about religion and are indoctrinated into the belief that an evil god like Jehovah isn't evil.
I think you should read it. Atrocities abound at the hands of the god of Israel.
originally posted by: Harte
You must have a great life, if you have time to worry about such folderol.
originally posted by: Rapha
originally posted by: Harte
You must have a great life, if you have time to worry about such folderol.
Please read the post next time.
Lets go over it again, slowly shall we.
As i mentioned, its going to be quite a laugh watching ignorant humans who are in a state of complete denial suddenly realising that they should have taken up the Cross of Jesus Christ and spoken His Gospel to others.
You obviously have never been in the company of the Rephaim have you ?
Or seen a Shaitan class jinn (shade) hooked to your physical left shoulder blade during an OOBE ?
Or stood in-front of a 30ft giant and had an argument whilst speaking Latin ?
originally posted by: Harte
originally posted by: CapstonePendulum
originally posted by: Harte
The ignorant, in order to remain so, comment without reading or thinking about what has already been posted in this thread.
To wit, the word "giant" didn't mean particularly large at the time. The origin of the word shows this to be true.
Also, the KJV is not the original Bible, and the Nag Hammadi "library" paints God as the enemy. Unlikely He inspired that.
Harte
The Nag Hammadi scriptures do not paint God in a negative image. The Hebrew bible does that.
God in the NHL is unknowable and called Innefable Aeon, Majesty and other things.
Your assumption that Jehovah is God is an assumption and the bible makes him look like a sociopath. Did God inspire that or humans?
Where the bible paints God as evil the NHL rejects that Jehovah is God. Is it wrong to believe that God is good and that Jesus is not Jehovah's son?
Not according to Jesus who calls the God of the Jews the father of lies and a murderer. They didn't worship Satan so I think you know nothing about religion and are indoctrinated into the belief that an evil god like Jehovah isn't evil.
I think you should read it. Atrocities abound at the hands of the god of Israel.
If you think anything, you should think I've already read it. There's been an online site for decades.
The Gnostic writings depict what most people consider to be God (the Creator) to be the enemy.
If you derive some sort of inner pleasure through contrarianism, then Gnosticism's for you.
Harte
originally posted by: Harte
Of course not, and neither have you.
originally posted by: Rapha
If you cannot see, confront and communicate face to face with daemons, then that does not mean that other mortals cannot do what you are not capable of.