It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why yes I have! They also move to new locations, get replaced, all sort of thing. But, nothing that would indicate that "adjustment" (intentional corruption) of the data is necessary.
originally posted by: tanka418
No, I saw that, and recognized it for the BS that it is...One doesn't "adjust" historical dat because they now have better equipment. The values in the existing dataset cannot be changed, to do so is corrupting that data.
I didn't say that, and you know it! I said the temperature increase is natural. And, last I heard; ice in the Antarctic was increasing, while Greenland slowly melted.
And yes I know about, and have recently experienced, record heat, and record cold as well, record dry, and now record rain. But, ya know, after all the dust settled with the record heat...the record wasn't very significant...it was mostly local and wasn't a record after all (in a more global sense).
Since the 90's you say...I've seen records that were made before my time that still stand...I'm 68.
Yes I'm sure that all of that 'lines up"...very easy to do with "cooked data".
originally posted by: Justoneman
But CO2 has been even higher long before we existed.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
Actually that would be one of the most logical reasons to make an adjustment.
Oh well this is pointless because it seems you are one of those who stick to that mantra even when they have been informed to the contrary. You have your notions they just aren't based in logic.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
AND THE COMPUTER SCIENTIST HAS SPOKEN! Data can NEVER be adjusted! All those climatologists need to go back and reuse those old numbers with the old data acquisition methods.
originally posted by: Metallicus
Yes, I realize I will get slammed for posting this article disputing the climate agenda data, but I wanted to take the opportunity to post my view of what climate change is really about and that is control of the population by the elite.
Okay, I'm finished...you may now begin bashing me.
and even Forbes which denies global warming gets stuck into Mr Adams.
Ted Cruz Uses The Galileo Gambit To Deny Global Warming Steven Salzberg , Contributor Fighting Pseudoscience Follow on Forbes Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own. The word in Washington lately is that Senator Ted Cruz–who just announced that he’s running for President–is supposed to be a very smart guy. Some of this comes from Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz, who said last year that Cruz was “clearly among the top students” at the prestigious Harvard Law School. Dershowitz is very liberal, while Cruz is very conservative, so one assumes that Dershowitz wouldn’t say this if it weren’t true. Perhaps Cruz was an excellent law student. But when it comes to science, Cruz is no whiz kid. On the contrary, he seems to be woefully ignorant. We know this because despite his lack of expertise, he doesn’t hesitate to make sweeping pronouncements about scientific matters. In just the past week, Cruz has weighed in on two major science issues, and he’s been wrong on both. First, in an interview a few days ago with the Texas Tribune, Cruz stated that global warming isn’t happening. This wasn’t the first time he’s made that claim, but this time he threw in what’s known in skeptical circles as the “Galileo gambit,” a well-known ploy of conspiracy theorists. He compared his global warming denialism to Galileo thusly: “Today, the global warming alarmists are the equivalent of the flat-Earthers. It used to be [that] it is accepted scientific wisdom the Earth is flat, and this heretic named Galileo was branded a denier.”
other half told me they have decided not to have kids because of what is coming.
originally posted by: violet
a reply to: CornShucker
I wasn't questioning paranoia.
I'm still left not understanding the motives to fake global warming though, so can you enlighten me?
If you see a 1,000 ton boulder dropping from the sky, the cause could be climate change. That’s a new theory by the man who many regard as the “father of global warming.” we should be looking for falling rocks instead of rising waters