It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Forensick
Not only is Indonesia looking at Su-35s, but they want S300s too. They're not as advanced as the 400, but they're dangerous enough to legacy aircraft.
originally posted by: CovertAgenda
a reply to: anzha
What a dog. And they made us bury OUR pigs (after 40 odd years of tweaking to get right) so there was no turning back....
I say we buy the old plans for the TSR-2 off BAE and start almost from scratch and build something that's actually suited for our conditions/requirements.
Does anyone remember the arguments against a single engine from back in the f16/f18 selection days?
Obviously no-one in the RAAF does.
Still..... its not as if we actually had any choice in the matter....
originally posted by: C0bzz
Oh good, anther inquiry into the F-35 in Australia. What is this now? The 3rd?
The F-35 has been discussed in extreme detail in Australian Parliamentary Hearings. Multiple times. Transcripts are online.
DoD and RAAF have reiterated multiple times that the F-35 is the right aircraft.
Why not actually listen to them?
Greens defence spokesman Peter Whish-Wilson on Friday has urged the Senate's standing committee on foreign affairs and trade to inquire into the suitability of the stealth jet for Australia's strategic interests.
Peter Whish-Wilson really needs to stop wasting time and trying to get attention. This is what he is really doing.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: pronto
Things have changed a great deal since then with regards to single vs twin engine. Modern engines have a MTBF that almost exceeds their planned life cycle. They have the usual Depot checks, but some engines run 6-8,000 hours without a failure.
Indonesia is one of our high profile trading partners who regularly excercises in the Top End.
These f-35's were put to the test against a 1970 f-16 and lost lol. Doesn't matter how many missiles u strap to it.. Should we compare prices Su-35 vs f-35. You could buy Double the sukies
originally posted by: C0bzz
Can we get real here?
Relative to the RAAF, the Indonesian Air Force is a joke. They aren't much of a threat.
Can we stop with the paranoia?
RAAF has currently 72 Hornets, 24 Super Hornets, 6 Wedgetails, 5 A330 MRTTs. Armed with the latest weapons (i.e. JASSM-ER). Our pilots are probably better too. We also have a OTH-B radar - JORN.
In the near future we will get 12 Growlers, 2 additional A330 MRTTs, and begin F-35A deliveries. The F-35As will likely be warmed with AMRAAM, ASRAAM, and a version of JSM built to our own requirements. We will also have SEA1000, SEA5000, SEA4000 coming up. We also have two Canberra Class LHD's to help provide stability to the region.
We don't need the US to plug holes.
If Indonesia obtained Su-35's and used them offensively they would be shot down. Then we could bomb their airfields using a variety of assets, including the strike ability of the F-35.
originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: Zaphod58
Question . Indonesia launches SU-35s against us . Australian radar picks them up with plenty of time . Who wins , given that the F35s have all their bugs ironed out . Thats the bottom line .