It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Russian Nuclear Units On The Move, Civilians Told To Leave, Putin vs. ISIS

page: 5
10
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 1 2015 @ 10:47 AM
link   
a reply to: MysterX

Do you really think Russian use of nukes as a deterrent would have worked without the U.S. using it in WWII?

Like it or not, the use by the U.S. has been the most effective deterrent of them all....

It's example has been a deterrent for us all.....




posted on Nov, 1 2015 @ 11:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: markosity1973
a reply to: tony9802

Zaphod speculates it was blocked pitot tubes that caused the crash, not terrorists.

I think this story is just people's imaginations running wild.


How does he friggen know that? Nvm, I'm checking out that thread.



posted on Nov, 1 2015 @ 12:58 PM
link   
Nukes would be pointless when your fighting an enemy that is close in with Assads forces and population centers. Most of the people killed would not be ISIS. This story makes zero military sense. As Russia has learned just bombing ISIS or the rebels in general does not do much unless you have something on the ground to follow it up. Assad and his allies have failed to make advances of note. Nukes would do nothing but, kill lots of civilians and make large parts of Syria unlivable and turn every Syrian and Muslim in the World against Russia.



posted on Nov, 1 2015 @ 02:20 PM
link   
a reply to: tony9802

Youre speaking of one against one. The BOMB (as in one) on ISIS (as in a hundred different locations).

And just how many locations and how many nukes do you need? ISIS is everywhere there...mixed with women and children.

If they blew up all those civilians and all those locations...and they are everywhere...you still wouldnt get ISIS...not all of them.

Stupid idea



posted on Nov, 1 2015 @ 02:29 PM
link   
a reply to: mysterioustranger

Not only that, but Nukes are a 'last resort' option, a kind of trump card if you will.

Once you have played it, you have nothing further up your sleeve and unless Russia thinks it can take all of ISIS out with one or two bombs, then it makes no tactical sense because ISIS will just go mental - like ants do if you disturb their nest.

I'd put Raqqa at the top of the list for a tactical strike if they were considering it though (I am pretty sure they're not) because it is the unofficial capital.



posted on Nov, 1 2015 @ 02:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: FlySolo

originally posted by: markosity1973
a reply to: tony9802

Zaphod speculates it was blocked pitot tubes that caused the crash, not terrorists.

I think this story is just people's imaginations running wild.


How does he friggen know that? Nvm, I'm checking out that thread.


He was basing it on comparing flight data with that of the downed Air France flight near South America.

Further evidence makes that early conclusion unlikely - either a fire on board, a bomb or maybe the tail section failed causing explosive decompression are the likely cause.

MANPAD (shoulder launched missiles) cannot take the flight out at 31,000 feet.



posted on Nov, 1 2015 @ 03:03 PM
link   
a reply to: markosity1973

Agreed. Its a lot like tag. Drop bomb #1-TAG! Now YOURE it!" The other side then retaliates...and so on, so on and so on.

Mutual destruction in many places worldwide nearly instantaneously. And still cant get completely rid of each opponent 100%.

Up the ranks on both sides of the conflict comes the children left...and war continues because we and them killed their relatives, cities and countries.

Horrible results and prob. a long standing continuation of conflict until there no life left on the planet.



posted on Nov, 1 2015 @ 03:05 PM
link   
is there not another live thread with russia claiming to have a standard bomb that causes the same damage as a nuke without the radiation,i would suggest if putin was gonna bomb them he would use this.
but america shot it down not isis in my opinion



posted on Nov, 1 2015 @ 03:37 PM
link   
ever considerd that the US troops that went to syria is to protect and save the leaders of ISIS?
well the west have there revenge of MH17....
surpriced how fast they closed the sinai flying route....!?a reply to: MysterX


edit on 1-11-2015 by ressiv because: (no reason given)

edit on 1-11-2015 by ressiv because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 1 2015 @ 03:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: ressiv
ever considerd that the US troops that went to syria is to protect and save the leaders of ISIS?
well the west have there revenge of MH17....
surpriced how fast they closed the sinai flying route....!?a reply to: MysterX



Considering how many ISIS leaders (including number 2) the US has killed in the last year that would make no sense.



posted on Nov, 1 2015 @ 04:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: MrSpad
Nukes would be pointless when your fighting an enemy that is close in with Assads forces and population centers. Most of the people killed would not be ISIS. This story makes zero military sense. As Russia has learned just bombing ISIS or the rebels in general does not do much unless you have something on the ground to follow it up. Assad and his allies have failed to make advances of note. Nukes would do nothing but, kill lots of civilians and make large parts of Syria unlivable and turn every Syrian and Muslim in the World against Russia.


Every southern Christian I've come across in the last few years here in the good ole South USA have been for us to turn the whole Middle East into glass...so at this point now what difference does it make?...



posted on Nov, 1 2015 @ 04:33 PM
link   
Grab Your popcorn Putin is about to put on s show.....

Russia have never been very cival when it comes to hostages and terrorism. Usually Alphas are sendt in With the task of showing no mercy towards the hostage takers or their families.... or terrorists. They wil Level a whole building to kill them all. Russians are brutal for a reason towards these People.

If Russia wants to use a tactical nuklear weapon because of this act, it is not because they want to whipe out IS. The nukes would be used to send a very clear Message to anyone who wants to try this again or support People who would think of doing this again. The nukes is nothing but a Message of what the costs is going to be for such an act.

But my gues is if this was done by terrorists, the Alphas will be sendt in. And i would feel very bad for these terrorists Family members where ever they live, because they will all have to pay dearly With their bodyparts. The Alphas are known for sending bodyparts from Family members of who ever commited the terror acts. This have worked more than once for the Russians.



edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 1 2015 @ 05:42 PM
link   
a reply to: 38181

The difference is, those in the States aren`t being flooded by Muslim refugees, so it`s easy for them to say it, if it were the other way around they would think different.

Not much of a point for Russia to turn the ME into glass and make the place unlivable for the refugees to hopefully return to their own country sooner than later, let alone create more refugees.



posted on Nov, 1 2015 @ 06:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: markosity1973
a reply to: mysterioustranger

Not only that, but Nukes are a 'last resort' option, a kind of trump card if you will.

Once you have played it, you have nothing further up your sleeve and unless Russia thinks it can take all of ISIS out with one or two bombs, then it makes no tactical sense because ISIS will just go mental - like ants do if you disturb their nest.

I'd put Raqqa at the top of the list for a tactical strike if they were considering it though (I am pretty sure they're not) because it is the unofficial capital.



That invites nuclear terrorism against Russia, does it not?



posted on Nov, 2 2015 @ 01:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: tony9802
Russian Nuclear Units On The Move, Civilians Told To Leave, Putin vs. ISIS

MindyT October 31, 2015
SHARE ON FACEBOOK
SHARE ON TWITTER
massive-nuclear-explosion[1]


consciouslyenlightened.com...#


"In response to the purported downing of a Russian civilian airliner in the Sinai in Egypt, the Kremlin is now poised for a nuclear strike on sites controlled by the Islamic State. Citing its right to protect its people and interests in Russia and abroad, Intelligence officials have anonymously reported that Russia is moving its tactical nuclear units closer to its international boundaries and its frontier with other hotspots within Russia, such as the northern Caucasus region. The Russian military have been called up to help evacuate Russian nationals within these hotspots and have ordered non-essential civilians to leave Syria, Iraq, the Gulf states and other nations in the Arab world."

The article continues with the following information:

"Although Russia’s poising to use its nuclear weapons on ISIS, Russia held a secret meeting with NATO, reassuring them that Russia has no intentions on using nuclear weapons on either Georgia or the Ukraine, citing that attacking either of them would invoke a nuclear strike from NATO. Also Russia had consulted with the Syrian government as well as the governments of its allies in the region, who in turned told the Kurds and other allied militias of a possible nuclear strike, warning them to move allied civilians from areas that might be struck by Russia’s nuclear weapons."

Additionally this important information is presented in the article:

"A meeting of allied nations and Russia was held in Teheran within hours of the downing of the civilian passenger airliner in the northern Sinai- in which media reports have said that there was no in-climate reported at the time of the crash and witnesses on the ground claim a line of smoke went from the ground in the direction of the airliner before the ground to air missile hit the airliner. SITE has reported that a video purportedly made by either ISIS supporters or ISIS themselves that shows the downing of the airliner. The White House has declined to make a statement about this incident and the Kremlin’s use of nuclear weapons. However, the Kremlin says the use of nuclear weapons is justified to protect its citizens and its interests, namely helping to sustain the government of Bashar Al-Assad and keeping the its allies in power in Iraq and Iran, which are considered allies to Russia. Their common interest in destroying ISIS motivates them to work together."




consciouslyenlightened.com...#

Please see full article for additional info, and while I believe this is a good source, perhaps others can help make those determinations while adding complementary source references;

'

Should we read ISIS as a cover for that very small but very powerful country in the middle east.?



posted on Nov, 6 2015 @ 06:34 AM
link   
a reply to: tony9802

and if Isis get hold of these nukes?

be interesting times.

maybe these nukes are smaller blasts than launching one from their country. But source could be more reliable.

thanks



posted on Nov, 6 2015 @ 06:58 AM
link   
A mega-fatal mistake to think Putin is another Obama. Putin will wipe out not only you, your family, everyone that ever uttered your name, but then he'll incinerate any records of you having ever existed on the planet and kill everyone that came within 10 kilometers of those records and their families.



posted on Nov, 20 2015 @ 10:29 PM
link   
Doesn't matter if Russia farts on ISIS, it changes nothing...This thing is never going away any time soon, because Islam pumps these sick #s out by the thousands

Islam must be banned entirely , and then it will still take 100 years, because of how spread across the planet and embedded they are in high places
edit on 20-11-2015 by SPECULUM because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join