The Church is always telling us that the Bible is God's Word, is Truth and therefore internally consistent. And so, using that as an axiom we can
prove conclusively that Mary was a practising lesbian and Jesus was a practising gay man. Joseph probably was too, but that's for another time. The
144,000 in Revelation are also gay and that's where we start.
Jesus being gay is a bit of a shocker for the non-Catholic churches what with their stance on homosexuality. For the Catholics, it's a
double-whammy. No wonder Mary's statues are always leaking. It's because she's a dyke!
For those who won't think for themselves, the proof starts with the 144,000 who are (NOT (defiled with women)) ; (are virgins) as well as
firstfruits. As firstfruits they all have something in common. The semicolon divides the 144,000 into two groups. We take the word "Virgin" and
cross-reference in the Bible. Mary was a virgin and was female. Therefore all virgins in the Bible are female. Half of the 144,000 are women. The
other half must be men. NOT (defiled with women) means making all the words the opposite so is the same as sanctified by men. (Note how with becomes
by.) That means the male half are gay and still being sanctified. Because they are all firstfruits the female half must also be gay and being
sanctified by women. So we have a new definition for "Virgin". It means "Practising Lesbian" and can be applied wherever the word is used
because the Bible is internally consistent. Mary was therefore a lesbo. Firstfruit means "practising gay" and Jesus was a first fruit both of God
and Mary. Jesus was therefore a practising gay male. The 144,000 follow the Lamb withersoever he goeth. Withersoever means However, ie according to
manner. If the author had meant Wherever he would have used it. So we get the picture of Jesus walking/acting in a particular way and the others
following. It sounds like being gay/mincing to me.
It's backed up in John 1 "But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: Which
were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God." This is always skipped by the Church. "Of blood"
means descent or lineage. So who gets born without a lineage, that doesn't fit the usual criteria for biological life (the will of the flesh is the
nature/biology of procreation and furthering the species) and goes against the nature/biology of the parents (the will of man where man is male and
female)? It's a gay person, of course. Gay people are "Of God", says the Bible. Jesus was "Of God" so therefore, again, he's gay.
No wonder the Church has suppressed this. It would mean the majority straight clergy would have to be subservient to a minority gay leadership. The
congregation would clamour to talk to the gays and the straights would be out of a job. All that power lost to a few puffs. So, homosexuals were
demonised and ejected from the Church as sinners destined for hell. That's the way it has been for centuries.
Will it change? No. Not until the Church implodes. A few more nuggets like this and its sandy foundations will start to be washed away. Lies
always get found out. They should know that. May the Church collapse into a heap of steaming rubble burying the straight clergy for all to see.