It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
This would be shot down in the courts (pun intended) before the ink were dry on any potential Executive Order.
She is just doing more of her imbecilic pandering shtick.
This court maybe, but how old is Scalia? Lose just one justice and let Obama appoint one, and the balance of power changes.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
This would be shot down in the courts (pun intended) before the ink were dry on any potential Executive Order.
She is just doing more of her imbecilic pandering shtick.
This court maybe, but how old is Scalia? Lose just one justice and let Obama appoint one, and the balance of power changes.
And then what?
With 300 million odd guns how would confiscation work?
Why even bother with the effort?
Dont see how there is anything to worry about as it wont work as long as the majority are against this it wont work with out causeing a # storm.
originally posted by: Logman
Please show where history shows this? Oh right...you can't.
Unless you mean that despotic regime in Australia.
How the British Gun Control Program Precipitated the American Revolution
David B. Kopel
Independence Institute; Denver University - Sturm College of Law
April 14, 2012
6 Charleston Law Review 283 (2012)
Abstract:
This Article chronologically reviews the British gun control which precipitated the American Revolution: the 1774 import ban on firearms and gun powder; the 1774-75 confiscations of firearms and gun powder, from individuals and from local governments; and the use of violence to effectuate the confiscations. It was these events which changed a situation of rising political tension into a shooting war. Each of these British abuses provides insights into the scope of the modern Second Amendment.
From the events of 1774-75, we can discern that import restrictions or bans on firearms or ammunition are constitutionally suspect — at least if their purpose is to disarm the public, rather than for the normal purposes of import controls (e.g., raising tax revenue, or protecting domestic industry). We can discern that broad attempts to disarm the people of a town, or to render them defenseless, are anathema to the Second Amendment; such disarmament is what the British tried to impose, and what the Americans fought a war to ensure could never again happen in America. Similarly, gun licensing laws which have the purpose or effect of only allowing a minority of the people to keep and bear arms would be unconstitutional. Finally, we see that government violence, which should always be carefully constrained and controlled, should be especially discouraged when it is used to take firearms away from peaceable citizens. Use of the military for law enforcement is particularly odious to the principles upon which the American Revolution was based.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 50
Keywords: American Revolution, gun control
JEL Classification: K19, K42, N41
I used to issue leaflets asking people to enlist as recruits. One of the arguments I had used was distasteful to the Commissioner: 'Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look back upon the Act depriving the whole nation of arms as the blackest. If we want the Arms Act to be repealed, if we want to learn the use of arms, here is a golden opportunity. If the middle classes render voluntary help to Government in the hour of its trial, distrust will disappear, and the ban on possessing arms will be withdrawn.'
-- Gandhi, Mohandas K. "Mahatma", An Autobiography: The Story of My Experiments with Truth, tr. Mahadev Desai, Part V., Ch. XXVII
...
...
In 1938, Hitler signed a new Gun Control Act. Now that many “enemies of the state” had been removed from society, some restrictions could be slightly liberalized, especially for Nazi Party members. But Jews were prohibited from working in the firearms industry, and .22 caliber hollow-point ammunition was banned. The time had come to launch a decisive blow to the Jewish community, to render it defenseless so that its “ill-gotten” property could be redistributed as an entitlement to the German “Volk.” The German Jews were ordered to surrender all their weapons, and the police had the records on all who had registered them. Even those who gave up their weapons voluntarily were turned over to the Gestapo.
...
originally posted by: onequestion
Don't you see that they won't confidcate the guns for exactly the same reason everyone has so many of them in the first place?
Ughhh