It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

911myths.com : WHY FAKING >73° BANK-ANGLES for a NoC FLYING PLANE.?

page: 25
29
<< 22  23  24    26  27  28 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 4 2015 @ 09:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: LaBTop
That's a pretty long rebuttal to someone who has not been here since Dec. 28, 2012.

Just saying


Reheat


Probably took the OP that long to make the post!

Nice job, but it is TLDR. I tried, but idk what most of it means. A for effort though...




posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 03:19 AM
link   
a reply to: PublicOpinion



I don't need your advice, mate. You need mine.


Well, not taking right advice is why the 9/11 Truth Movement is the laughingstock that it is today. I can't take your advice because you were not knowledgeable enough to understand that large aircraft can fly at high speed at low level, that is, until I made you aware of that fact.


edit on 5-11-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 06:50 AM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409




I can't take your advice because you were not knowledgeable enough to understand that large aircraft can fly at high speed at low level, that is, until I made you aware of that fact.


SkyTV lied again. I'm Sure, Not. And this is Idiocracy.



That's the point I was thinking of as well, max-speed in groundeffect sounds like pure insanity. An impossible stunt for a 'starter' with regards to piloting-skills.


Free advice, twofold:
- mark my words and stop putting things in my mouth I never said
- work on your text comprehension skills


originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: PublicOpinion

I guess I can sum it up by simply saying that you have been made aware that large aircraft can fly at high speed at very low altitudes with no problem.



IF I would've said that, yes. Read again!


Since it was impossible for American 77 to have conducted a NoC flight path and strike the Pentagon in a slight left bank, the flight path issue was a non-issue from the beginning.

These depictions should have been clues that a NoC flight path was a fabrication.

Depiction 1: SoC flight path Proof

Depiction 2: SoC Flight Path Proof

Depiction 3: SoC Flight Path Proof

Depiction 4: SoC Flgiht Path Proof


You've got a point here, no need to be disingenuous after all.
Let's keep it objective, will ya?

Highspeed in groundeffect without piloting skills or autopilot-functions, whilst hitting lightpoles as if it were nothing, is a problem. No need to talk away things, that start to make you go hmmm...



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 07:57 AM
link   
a reply to: PublicOpinion




whilst hitting lightpoles as if it were nothing, is a problem.

Cars take out light poles all the time without a problem.
Why do you feel a plane can't handle it in the last 2 seconds of flight?



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 08:04 AM
link   
a reply to: samkent

Bullocks. Drive into one and show me how you managed to hit a second.



Why do you feel a plane can't handle it in the last 2 seconds of flight?


Groundeffect, highspeed, no autopilot, no piloting-skills. There you go.
Also, why do you 'feel' there is absolutely no problem with this story?



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 12:19 PM
link   
a reply to: PublicOpinion



Groundeffect, highspeed,...


Which pilots of low wing aircraft use to cushion their landings or depend upon to get their aircraft off the ground before takeoff speed is reached during soft field takeoffs.


... no autopilot,


Why would he use autopilot when a pilot can handle an aircraft much faster than an autopilot?


... no piloting-skills.


Hani Hanjour obtained a commercial pilot license, which requires flying skills above that needed to obtain a private pilot license. Hani Hanjour also flew many hours under IFR, which requires flying skills even more precise, not to mention that he had logged well over 200 flying hours. Afterward, he applied for a B-737-Type rating, With that much flying experience, what makes 9/11 conspiracy theorist think that Hani Hanjour could not fly a Cessna?

Hani Hanjour's Commercial Pilot License

Hani Hanjour's Application

edit on 5-11-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 01:56 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409


Hani Hanjour obtained a commercial pilot license, which requires flying skills above that needed to obtain a private pilot license. Hani Hanjour also flew many hours under IFR, which requires flying skills even more precise, not to mention that he had logged well over 200 flying hours. Afterward, he applied for a B-737-Type rating, With that much flying experience, what makes 9/11 conspiracy theorist think that Hani Hanjour could not fly a Cessna?


Hani Hanjour couldn't fly a kite much less a paper airplane.

You desperately want everyone to believe in the impossible, hows that working for you?

I am a better pilot then Hani hanjour, I have 12 years in flight simulators experience.

I know many real pilots online and they laugh at the idea that Hani Hanjour could pull off such a stunt.

That's why the OS of flight 77 is the laughing stock of the century. No professional pilot believes it.

You can continue re post:


Hani Hanjour's Commercial Pilot License

Hani Hanjour's Application


A thousand times, It's not convincing enough.

edit on 5-11-2015 by Informer1958 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 03:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958



Hani Hanjour couldn't fly a kite much less a paper airplane.


Perhaps he couldn't fly a kite, but he was good enough to pass his FAA written, oral, and flight demonstration test to obtain a private and commercial pilot licenses, and have hours of IFR flight time under his belt in addtion to applying for a B-737-Type rating, which proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that your claim in baseless.



I am a better pilot then Hani hanjour, I have 12 years in flight simulators experience.


Then, why are you arguing with me?



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 04:21 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409


Then, why are you arguing with me?


Because you and I know the CIA can cook up any kind of paper work for their villein.



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 05:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958



Because you and I know the CIA can cook up any kind of paper work for their villein.


If you were a real pilot, you would have known that I am correct on all counts.



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 05:52 PM
link   


in addtion to applying for a B-737-Type rating


Really, so who's 737 did he fly to get certafied ?



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 06:19 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb



Really, so who's 737 did he fly to get certafied ?


The flight simulator of Pan Am. Now, let's take a look at the flight record of Hani Hanjour.



* 250 Hours Total Flight Time

* 75 Hours Instrument Flight Time

* 29 Hours Multi Engine Flight Time


edit on 5-11-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 06:24 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409

Pan Am went under in 1991..



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 06:26 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb

That was Pan Am International Flight Academy.



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 06:41 PM
link   
Isn't.



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 07:36 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409

* 250 Hours Total Flight Time

* 75 Hours Instrument Flight Time

* 29 Hours Multi Engine Flight Time


CIA fake documents.



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 07:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

That was Pan Am International Flight Academy.


Ok fine , now how do you know he trained there?



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 08:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958



* 250 Hours Total Flight Time

* 75 Hours Instrument Flight Time

* 29 Hours Multi Engine Flight Time

CIA fake documents.


Evidence please. No evidence, no case.



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 08:43 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb

You can begin here.

Hani Hanjour and the Pan Am International Flight Academy


edit on 5-11-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 08:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

You can begin here.

Hani Hanjour and the Pan Am International Flight Academy



Fix your link please..



new topics

top topics



 
29
<< 22  23  24    26  27  28 >>

log in

join