It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: babybunnies
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
a reply to: BubbaJoe
Yikes. Well don't steal watermelons! At least it was only buckshot.
Closest I ever came was getting caught in a cross-fire in NYC while we were driving down a street. We not only hit the floor but burrowed into the car carpet. Scary stuff.
Only in the USA can someone refer to the time that they got caught in the crossfire with such nonchalance.
Americans say that "There is nothing that can be done about gun violence" while ignoring the fact that they are one of the only countries on the planet that has a right to bear arms, and one of the only countries on the planet with a repeat mass murder problem.
"Nothing can be done about this"? How about whatever ALL the other countries are doing to stop this, successfully. Answer - GUN CONTROL. IT WORKS. EVERYWHERE.
originally posted by: babybunnies
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
a reply to: BubbaJoe
Yikes. Well don't steal watermelons! At least it was only buckshot.
Closest I ever came was getting caught in a cross-fire in NYC while we were driving down a street. We not only hit the floor but burrowed into the car carpet. Scary stuff.
Only in the USA can someone refer to the time that they got caught in the crossfire with such nonchalance.
Americans say that "There is nothing that can be done about gun violence" while ignoring the fact that they are one of the only countries on the planet that has a right to bear arms, and one of the only countries on the planet with a repeat mass murder problem.
"Nothing can be done about this"? How about whatever ALL the other countries are doing to stop this, successfully. Answer - GUN CONTROL. IT WORKS. EVERYWHERE.
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: BubbaJoe
Unfortunately there is one group who will just say "shall not be infringed". So it is impossible to even debate some.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: ~Lucidity
Bangin' away at shoplifters, Blam, Blam, ping, pweeee!
Erm, a firearms permit is not a license to kill.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: ~Lucidity
Bangin' away at shoplifters, Blam, Blam, ping, pweeee!
Erm, a firearms permit is not a license to kill.
Agreed. She should lose her permit and be charged with a felony. Reckless endangerment, etc.
She felt that her carry license empowered her above ordinary folks, and it gave her more authority than other people. Her actions illustrate this.
What an incredibly dangerous and stupid assed woman.
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
a reply to: babybunnies
Oh that wasn't nonchalance. It was scary as hell and also about three decades ago.
ETA: It was the police and bank robbers shooting at each other, and it was probably only about 10 shots but felt like hundreds.
I don't care if you do have an open carry permit.
Having a gun NEVER gives you permission to dole out vigilante justice.
Gun owners claim to love the Constitution, but seem to think that they can dole out justice that they see fit without the benefit of a fair trial, and think they can enforce laws that simply don't exist just by showing up with their gun.
Charge this woman with assault (even if the intention was good, she still shot someone) and set an example.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: murphy22
What's everyone upset about? A woman shot a gun at someone for freaking shoplifting in a crowded store. She could have injured or killed someone other than the shoplifter with her blinding stupidity.
originally posted by: BubbaJoe
a reply to: boymonkey74
Actually our Constitution says a well regulated militia shall not be infringed. The second amendment dudes, forget the part about a well regulated militia, but they damn well support the constitution, especially the 14th amendment.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: BubbaJoe
a reply to: boymonkey74
Actually our Constitution says a well regulated militia shall not be infringed. The second amendment dudes, forget the part about a well regulated militia, but they damn well support the constitution, especially the 14th amendment.
And other "dudes" have no idea what the terms in the constitution meant at the time they were written. So then they apply 20th and 21st century definitions to it and giggle to themselves about how the pro-2nd crowd ignores what the amendment says.
Pro-tip: we don't, there's just no point in arguing with people like you when you're completely ignorant about the very words you're giggling about