It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I sent the link so you could be made aware that underground fires existed. You seemed to be unaware of the possibility. The conditions are the same: Fuel, air, and ignition source. The fire burns slowly and stays hot in an insulated containment.
1. Hundreds of tons of combustibles at the bottom of the pile, with air fed into the bottom from a number of tunnels into the bathtub. No need to travel.
2. Fire, consuming clothing, books, people,...the tons of combustibles found in the pile...takes a lot to put out.
3. Only an idiot would use water to try and put out a metal based fire like thermite.
originally posted by: FlySolo
a reply to: pteridine
I sent the link so you could be made aware that underground fires existed. You seemed to be unaware of the possibility. The conditions are the same: Fuel, air, and ignition source. The fire burns slowly and stays hot in an insulated containment.
Burning coal is not the same as a conventional fire. Fail.
The air underground at ground zero was shown to be three orders of a magnitude less than that required to sustain smoldering combustion. That means 3x less. Yet temperatures where at 2800 degrees with tens of thousands of tons of concrete, 4 million gallons of water plus thousands of gallons of pyrocool FEF in the first 10 days. There is no way paper and wood can maintain such a temperature. And there is no way you give two sh!ts that what I'm telling you is the truth. IF you believe your lies, you've fallen out of the tree. There is NO way, it's a thermodynamic impossibility.
originally posted by: FlySolo
a reply to: pteridine
Thanks for clearing that up. Then there was 1000x less oxygen.
You have no idea of air infiltration rates or temperatures below ground level. You are another gullible wannabe who believes those who have agendas and have suckered you into believing their fantasies.
Is it my turn now and tell you what I think of you or are you going to complain for a cookie? Because really, I don't mind your ad homs just as long as I can say what's on my mind. Deal? Don't complain so I can say what's really on my mind without being censored. And I won't complain about you.
Someone has told you that a few hundred pounds of thermite would accomplish the same thing as tons of burning office contents.
Stop blindly believing the inconsistent theories and claims of knowledge of conspiracy without evidence.
If someone says thermite caused the collapse, ask where the charges were placed and what their sizes were. Ask how they were timed.
originally posted by: FlySolo
a reply to: pteridine
No, I won't stoop. You throw around insults hoping to win an argument but it doesn't do anything. It just makes you look desperate. And I've learned a few things debating on ATS. My inaccurate definition of order of magnitude was enough to stimulate a knee jerk emotional outburst to correct me. Doing so only made my point more valid. 1000x less air. Now don't you feel silly?
Someone has told you that a few hundred pounds of thermite would accomplish the same thing as tons of burning office contents.
No one told me that except you, with your logic it would take tons and tons of thermite to equal the heat intensity of conventional fires smothered in concrete.
Flub 2.
Under estimating the work of others
Stop blindly believing the inconsistent theories and claims of knowledge of conspiracy without evidence.
No one is blindly believing anything. Not even you believe your lies but for whatever nefarious reason you stand by it.
If someone says thermite caused the collapse, ask where the charges were placed and what their sizes were. Ask how they were timed.
I have asked, and I have researched. They put them in the elevator shafts. They being ACE elevators and the mossad art students. Its foolish of you to assume I just repeat what I hear because you will lose this debate.
Using the heat of reaction of thermite, show how a few hundred pounds would keep thousands of tons of rubble hot for weeks. Of course you can't because it won't. You have no idea of even where to begin because if you had any idea of the thermodynamics at all, you would have never repeated that statement that you found on some website.
What is the geometry of the elevator shafts and their structure? If the elevator shafts in the core failed first, why did the core remain standing while the outer shell collapsed?
I have asked, and I have researched. They put them in the elevator shafts. They being ACE elevators and the mossad art students. Its foolish of you to assume I just repeat what I hear because you will lose this debate.
Skyride Tower Felled by Melting Steel Legs
Intense heat was employed by wrecking engineers in toppling the 3,000,000-pound east tower of the “Skyride,” a major attraction of Chicago's Century of Progress. Huge “overshoes” in the form of cupolas made of steel and lined with firebrick were constructed around two legs of the tower and filled with 1,500 pounds of thermite, a mixture of aluminum and iron oxide.
When fired by electricity the thermite generated a temperature of more than 5,000 degrees about the two legs, melting the ten-foot sections almost instantly, causing the tower to tip and then to crash. A microphone attached to the tip of the tower broadcast the noise of the fall by radio, and the spectacle was viewed by a crowd estimated at more than 100,000. The west tower had been wrecked several weeks earlier with dynamite.
books.google.com...=onepage&q&f=true
originally posted by: FlySolo
a reply to: pteridine
Using the heat of reaction of thermite, show how a few hundred pounds would keep thousands of tons of rubble hot for weeks. Of course you can't because it won't. You have no idea of even where to begin because if you had any idea of the thermodynamics at all, you would have never repeated that statement that you found on some website.
Just because I'm not an explosives expert with all the answers doesn't mean I can't see through the bullsh!t of someone who thinks they do. You have no clue at all either so stop pretending. In fact, it was Richard Gage who said, 10 men, 10 lbs, 10 trips. I'll leave it to the professionals to get my information. Me saying a few hundred pounds is just an arbitrary guess. You're the one who said tons and tons. Where do you get tons and tons from? Did the math? Probably not because like you and all other die hard OSers who regurgitate 911 myth sites, don't know squat.
And yes, Mossad art students. If you knew anything you would already know what I'm talking about. But you know jack squat.
What is the geometry of the elevator shafts and their structure? If the elevator shafts in the core failed first, why did the core remain standing while the outer shell collapsed?
You're on drugs. Nothing remained especially the core. Now w'ere going to argue about that aren't we?
originally posted by: FlySolo
a reply to: skyeagle409
because they did it wrong
originally posted by: FlySolo
a reply to: pteridine
No. you answer my questions. How do you quantify the amount of thermite to continue a fire for 4 months? How much is needed to take out the core columns? How much time is required to rig the thermite? How many people would need to be involved? Ok. go!