It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The real reason there is a war against western heritage

page: 6
47
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 1 2015 @ 06:43 PM
link   
a reply to: TheLaughingGod

Still so lost, your hatred blinds you, the king is a beggar. The world turned white 500 years ago, and you hold to high of yourself. You live in a fantasy of white purity that only exist in your delusions.
You think you are the same as them, you are not.




posted on Sep, 1 2015 @ 11:52 PM
link   
Almost everything I know about any history or culture other than Western history and culture I learned on my own, since it isn't taught in schools. And while Western history and culture is far and away the most relevant to Westerners, other societies are important to learn about, too. If you're an American voter, you need to learn about the rest of the world as well as your own history.
a reply to: edward777



posted on Sep, 2 2015 @ 12:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
...
Which is why the penalty for crack is more severe than coke and why poor black nieghbourhoods have been flooded with crack. Hence, the mass arrests & harassment that take place in these nieghbourhoods can easily be justified by TPTB.


i don't really care to discuss which drug between crack, and coke is worse, or having which carries a longer sentence... They are both bad drugs that destroy families, communities and people's lives.

Yes, there are established government agencies that have been, and probably still are using these drugs for whatever end they have in mind, including money. But that doesn't change the fact that these, among others are really bad drugs.



originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
So are you trying to claim the soviet union was all about same sex marriage, equality of all minorities & belief systems and the masses having total control in how there government was run?


To this day most socialists and communists still can't understand what actually makes a country communist or socialist.

It is not about what form of "materialism" is/has been used, but about using the mantra of "for the good of the people we have to give up X". Socialism eventually leads to communism. Both systems have a myriad of branches which have some differences. Originally Marx's idea was to eliminate religion completely, (which coincidentally it's your idea as well) and to simply concentrate on the material. These days you can find branches of socialism and even communism which even use religion as a tool. Right now the head of the catholic church happens to be a socialist who is working with socialists and communists to bring down capitalism and supplant it with socialism. Both systems claim to give power to the people and in reality they give power to the state, and the few who run the state.



originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
First you claimed the progressive movement created communism, then in the next sentence claim they were also responsible for modern day corporate control. In other words, it seems to me that you can't even decide what progressivism actually is.


Learn to actually read and understand what people type... Where did i write that progressives created communism?... Progressives, among others, helped finance red revolutions, they established the Federal Reserve, the World Bank, and other similar institutions.



originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
Firstly, there wouldn't be a bureaucracy in a true democracy. Plus, how can capitalism possibly not contradict democracy?


What you call "true democracy" is nothing more than "mob rule".



originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
In a democratic system the people rule, but in a capitalists system the rich rule. A democratic capitalism may have balanced itself out before the corporation came along, but in the modern times, the democratic process has become a completely meaningless gesture, since the 1% rule the masses no matter what party you vote for.


Not all systems in which "the people rule" are good. More so when many such systems just claim to give power to the people, but in the end the power rests with the state. Giving unrestricted power/control over to the state is always a bad idea.


originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
We currently have a capitalist democracy and what's needed is a socialist democracy. Privately owned banks should be banned and should be made non for profit government run agencies, then the bureaucracy as a whole should be subjected to the democratic process, so the masses have total control over all government agencies.


lol, private banks have never been the problem. The problem has been central banks, which is what you want to keep... As for "the masses having total control"... You should get down from that cloud. No one should have "total control".



originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
Political parties should be banned, so your voting for the person and not the party and elected officials aren't obligated to follow the status quo of a political party. Corporate donations should also be banned.

It should also be highly illegal to base policies on christian morals and primitive "traditional" ideologies.
...


Really? why don't we make you the King while we are at it?...


edit on 2-9-2015 by ElectricUniverse because: add and correct comment.



posted on Sep, 2 2015 @ 02:45 PM
link   
a reply to: yulka

Lost and found. You don't really know what you're talking about do you. Hatred is just temporary. You yourself seem completely in harmony with what your rulers would want you to believe and think. If I am caught in hatred you are caught in the conventional Swedish narcissism and arrogance. You think Swedes acknowledge and think they're a social experiment? That is a very optimistic view. Swedes don't know jack and only think the way they have been taught to think, as do you conforming to this ideology you've been inundated with. Just look at how you as one of two other Swedes in this thread have locked onto me as a dissident that must be brought in line with the cognitive dissonance of your fuzzy neo-hippie beliefs. Never in the history of man on this planet has there been a population more naive than modern Swedes.

It is true the king is a beggar. But when it comes to race you are in the dark.

The same as whom?



edit on 2-9-2015 by TheLaughingGod because: locked not looked..



posted on Sep, 5 2015 @ 05:56 AM
link   
Why can't we just have HUMAN heritage? The past has repeatedly shown the National pride and over-zealous heritages are not good on the world stage. Now, I'm not saying get rid of heritage all together, but why not combine it all and call it the Human Heritage? *Cue incoming COMMIE attack*



posted on Sep, 6 2015 @ 02:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: LittleByLittle
You might wanna learn more history before you think Sweden should become vikings and that vikings is our heritage. They where advanced shipbuilders and traders but raiding is kind of barbaric.


Maybe rading is considered barbaric in Sweden, but over on the other side of the pond in Wall St. corporate rading is considered chic.

The thing is, raiding never went away, just the things people considered worth plundering has changed.

Think, Oil.

edit on 6-9-2015 by AMPTAH because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics
 
47
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join