Luke, I am your father CHANGED, to NO, I am your father......

originally posted by: DutchMasterChief
a reply to: TerryDon79

Are unicorns experienced by large groups of people in the same situations?

ME isn't "experienced" by anyone as it can't be detected.

a reply to: vlawde

I remember it as Sex AND the City too though, and it makes sense, since it was about sex and life in the City.

a reply to: TerryDon79

But the common memories are, which is the possible evidence.

originally posted by: DutchMasterChief
a reply to: TerryDon79

But the common memories are, which is the possible evidence.

Common memories can be possible evidence?

You mean like the studies done into a group of people who had a faulty memory?

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: hidingthistime

And there is your problem. You are trusting your memories too much and refusing to believe they could be wrong.

So are you! What makes you think you could possibly know better if you believe memory is so faulty?


What makes you think you know better that the 20 people last night who refused to believe the new map i showed them.

Not one person believed in the new giant austraila that is close to land! Not one!

They also allllllll truly believd our hearts are upper left above the nipple. They thought the internet was lying to me and thought I was falling for it!

If one real life person believed in "NO I am your father" i would maybe second guess myself a little, but they were all adamant!

everyone last night... everyone...

originally posted by: DutchMasterChief
a reply to: TerryDon79

But the common memories are, which is the possible evidence.

No, it's just that Sex IN the City seems what you'd think it would be called. So we saw the title as what we thought it would be, versus how it actually was. This whole Mandela Effect nonsense is all based on false memory

a reply to: vlawde

Giving it a name is a stretch for me. Mandela, Mandala, Mondail...Bad memory is the thing I reckon.

a reply to: TerryDon79

Yes, so you agree that in this case, they are both untestable possibilities then.

originally posted by: DutchMasterChief
a reply to: TerryDon79

Yes, so you agree that in this case, they are both untestable possibilities then.

Both? No.

ME is completely untestable.

Faulty memory is testable (has and still is being tested).

a reply to: vlawde

I said it was Sex AND the City, I agreed with you, but I see how you could misinterprete it. Kinda.

originally posted by: Jonjonj
a reply to: vlawde

Giving it a name is a stretch for me. Mandela, Mandala, Mondail...Bad memory is the thing I reckon.

Haha yup! Alzheimer's/Dementia!

a reply to: TerryDon79

Faulty memory is testable (has and still is being tested).

You are so predictable. I specifically added "in this case" because I knew you would say that for the 1000th time, but you still did.

You can't test if these memories are due to faulty memory......the only thing a true scientist can claim is that it is possibly due to faulty memory.

a reply to: DutchMasterChief

I can actually see why it could contextually be and and in.

It's about sex AND life IN the city.

That could also explain why some remember one over the other. The brain always tries to contextualise things.

originally posted by: DutchMasterChief
a reply to: TerryDon79

Faulty memory is testable (has and still is being tested).

You are so predictable. I specifically added "in this case" because I knew you would say that for the 1000th time, but you still did.

You can't test if these memories are due to faulty memory......the only thing a true scientist can claim is that it is possibly due to faulty memory.

Science can use methods to see if faulty memory is likely or not.

Science has zero methods to test for the ME.

a reply to: TerryDon79

Yes and?

This still doesn't exclude anything because you simply don't have the knowledge.