It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Luke, I am your father CHANGED, to NO, I am your father......

page: 40
33
<< 37  38  39    41  42  43 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 23 2016 @ 03:37 PM
link   
BTW it's ALWAYS been "Sex AND the City"




posted on May, 23 2016 @ 03:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: vlawde
BTW it's ALWAYS been "Sex AND the City"
to you! I have actually never watched sex AND the city yet,.but I certainly watched sex IN the city! 😉



posted on May, 23 2016 @ 03:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: vlawde
BTW it's ALWAYS been "Sex AND the City"


I pass on that one. I never watched it, but it has been on when I've been around. Both "sex AND the city" and "sex IN the city" make perfect contextual sense (from my understanding of the programme).



posted on May, 23 2016 @ 03:51 PM
link   
Even Jenna Marbles, and she is the coolest! 😂




posted on May, 23 2016 @ 03:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: hidingthistime


For those who didn't watch this vid, here we have the guy that did the voice(James Earl Jones) of Darth Vader talking about it and he says it was "Luke I am your father."

Does he misremember the famous line too, even though he spoke it?



posted on May, 23 2016 @ 04:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: DutchMasterChief

originally posted by: hidingthistime


For those who didn't watch this vid, here we have the guy that did the voice(James Earl Jones) of Darth Vader talking about it and he says it was "Luke I am your father."

Does he misremember the famous line too, even though he spoke it?



Obviously. People have faulty memories.

Did you know that there's a scene where Luke (mark Hamill) calls leia (Carrie fisher) by her real name (Carrie)? There's even a video of mark, on camera, saying he didn't.



posted on May, 23 2016 @ 04:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: hidingthistime

And there is your problem. You are trusting your memories too much and refusing to believe they could be wrong.


So are you! What makes you think you could possibly know better if you believe memory is so faulty?


What makes you think you know better that the 20 people last night who refused to believe the new map i showed them.

Not one person believed in the new giant austraila that is close to land! Not one!

They also allllllll truly believd our hearts are upper left above the nipple. They thought the internet was lying to me and thought I was falling for it!

If one real life person believed in "NO I am your father" i would maybe second guess myself a little, but they were all adamant!
edit on 23-5-2016 by hidingthistime because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 23 2016 @ 04:12 PM
link   
a reply to: hidingthistime

Science says its faulty memory. It's been studied for hundreds of years.



posted on May, 23 2016 @ 04:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: hidingthistime

Science says its faulty memory. It's been studied for hundreds of years.
science actually points towards this being possible through quantum theories.



posted on May, 23 2016 @ 04:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: hidingthistime

Science says its faulty memory. It's been studied for hundreds of years.
science actually points towards this being possible through quantum theories.


QM points to a possibility of their being alternate timelines. QM doesn't say ANYTHING about slipping between them arbitrarily.



posted on May, 23 2016 @ 04:21 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

Science doesn't say that at all. It merely says that humans can have faulty memory. It doesn't say this is the case in this case.
edit on 23-5-2016 by DutchMasterChief because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 23 2016 @ 04:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: DutchMasterChief
a reply to: TerryDon79

Science does say that at all. It merely says that humans can have faulty memory. It doesn't say this is the case in this case.


Obviously it can't say that ME isn't real. There's no way to test it.

Science has studied faulty memory for hundreds of years though.



posted on May, 23 2016 @ 04:22 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

It doesn't exclude such a possibility either.



posted on May, 23 2016 @ 04:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: DutchMasterChief
a reply to: TerryDon79

It doesn't exclude such a possibility either.


It also doesn't include the possibility.

Using QM as a quick "science says its possibly" is absurd. QM does nothing of the sort. It neither includes or excludes it.



posted on May, 23 2016 @ 04:26 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79




Obviously it can't say that ME isn't real. There's no way to test it.


You are starting to get it. So maybe you should take a more agnostic approach?



posted on May, 23 2016 @ 04:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: DutchMasterChief
a reply to: TerryDon79




Obviously it can't say that ME isn't real. There's no way to test it.


You are starting to get it. So maybe you should take a more agnostic approach?


So lack of evidence means ME is a possibility?

There's no evidence of unicorns. Does that mean they exist?



posted on May, 23 2016 @ 04:29 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on May, 23 2016 @ 04:29 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

Are unicorns experienced by large groups of people in the same situations?



posted on May, 23 2016 @ 04:29 PM
link   
I got confused with all the stuff going on. My bad.
edit on 23-5-2016 by Jonjonj because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 23 2016 @ 04:30 PM
link   
I remember when the show came on, I thought it was odd it was "AND" and not in. But if you know the show it does make sense




top topics



 
33
<< 37  38  39    41  42  43 >>

log in

join