It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Proving the moon landing was a hoax - John Young is caught 'bare handed'.

page: 3
4
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:
(post by HolgerTheDane2 removed for a manners violation)

posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 02:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: turbonium1

Pretty weak stuff there.

Looks like a glove to me, or he has one massive hand.
I think they were expecting mittens.



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 03:12 AM
link   
On closer look, I see he has a gray-colored hand, so it is obviously a glove.

I was confused because it is so skin-tight, that it looks exactly like a bare hand.

He should be wearing pressurized gloves, right?

So how can the gloves be pressurized if they are skin-tight to his fingers?


The gloves have to be pressurized around every finger, right?

So unless his fingers are little slivers, then his gloves cannot be pressurized. They are the same size as his fingers, and we can even see defined knuckles! That's ridiculous...


Please show me a pressurized Apollo glove, and an unpressurized Apollo glove, if you can. I'd like to see proof that they are different, and that his gloves are correctly pressurized.

Because as I see it, they are clearly skin-tight, unpressurized, gloves, he is wearing,



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 03:18 AM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1



I was confused because it is so skin-tight, that it looks exactly like a bare hand.
No. It doesn't.



He should be wearing pressurized gloves, right?

How much do you think the gloves (and suits) were pressurized?
www.hq.nasa.gov...
edit on 8/16/2015 by Phage because: (no reason given)


(post by turbonium1 removed for a manners violation)

posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 04:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage

No. It doesn't.


Other than being gray, yes, it does.



originally posted by: Phage
How much do you think the gloves (and suits) were pressurized?
www.hq.nasa.gov...


3.75 psi.

How about proving the gloves are pressurized by showing a pressurized glove, and a unpressurized glove, so we can compare the two. I'd think NASA would have taken a few photos of the famous Apollo gloves, in both pressurized and unpressurized state, no?



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 04:05 AM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1




This video clip proves, beyond any doubt, that Apollo astronauts did not land on the moon...

Except it doesn't.
Why is it you guys so desperately want to believe that something we did that was amazing didn't happen , it makes about as much sense to me as deluded flat Earthers claiming what they claim.
The evidence is on the Moon that shows we went to the Moon.



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 04:12 AM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1




3.75 psi.

Very good. You can read. Gosh, that's a lot of pressure.



I'd think NASA would have taken a few photos of the famous Apollo gloves, in both pressurized and unpressurized state, no?
Have you looked? Or do I have to give that to you as well?

Your OP is wrong. Your premise is wrong.
Guess what, you are wrong.

edit on 8/16/2015 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 04:16 AM
link   
Video clip proves nothing. For crying out aloud, the hand is gloved.

Get over it already. Can't understand this waste of space.

Bally.



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 04:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage

Very good. You can read. Gosh, that's a lot of pressure.


It is a lot of pressure, which would make the gloves look quite different than without all that pressure.

You should be able to understand what I'm getting at, right?


originally posted by: Phage
Have you looked? Or do I have to give that to you as well?


I have looked, that's why I'm asking you.

You didn't give me anything I've asked for, only a document I didn't ask for, to answer your own question about the operating pressure.

Can you now post the images I've been asking you for, or can you not?



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 04:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: bally001
Video clip proves nothing. For crying out aloud, the hand is gloved.

Get over it already. Can't understand this waste of space.

Bally.


A truly ironic post you've contributed to the thread, Well done.



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 04:35 AM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1
3.75 psi is a lot? Seriously? You know you're sitting in 14 psi right now, right?

 


I have looked, that's why I'm asking you.
You don't look good.

Unpressurized:
www.alanbeangallery.com...


Pressurized:



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 04:37 AM
link   
From what I can see, it does indeed look like he's got a glove on. I agree that that there are some things about the moon landings that we don't know about and probably never will, but on this occasion it's just and astronaut on the moon wearing a glove.
Always good to see people are still questioning the landings though.



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 04:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
Unpressurized:
www.alanbeangallery.com...


Pressurized:




The unpressurized gloves are actually even bigger, or 'puffed out', than the supposedly 'pressurized' gloves, which are skin-tight. Especially when you compare the fingers of both gloves.

Thanks so much for helping me prove my point.



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 04:49 AM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1


The unpressurized gloves are actually even bigger, or 'puffed out', than the supposedly 'pressurized' gloves, which are skin-tight.
No, they aren't. You are delusional just as you were when you claimed to see a bare hand.
There is little discernible difference because 3.75 psi is very low pressure. It would barely inflate a toy balloon much less the pressure gloves which, if you read the material I provided, you might know a bit about. The gloves could not be "skin tight", however, if anything, the pressurized glove displays a smoother surface than the unpressurized, which makes sense.

edit on 8/16/2015 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 05:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: turbonium1


The unpressurized gloves are actually even bigger, or 'puffed out', than the supposedly 'pressurized' gloves, which are skin-tight.
No, they aren't. You are delusional just as you were when you claimed to see a bare hand.
There is little discernible difference because 3.75 psi is very low pressure. It would barely inflate a toy balloon much less the pressure gloves which, if you read the material I provided, you might know a bit about. The gloves could not be "skin tight", however, if anything, the pressurized glove displays a smoother surface than the unpressurized, which makes sense.


Well Phage don't expect anything other than,

"A truly ironic post you've contributed to the thread, Well done."

I was trying to put it simply in my reply regarding a gloved hand.

Kind regards,

Bally


(post by Iamnotadoctor removed for a manners violation)

posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 06:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: turbonium1
This video clip proves, beyond any doubt, that Apollo astronauts did not land on the moon...

The page is linked first, then a link to the specific mpeg clip..

www.hq.nasa.gov...

www.hq.nasa.gov...

This is a link explaining it in detail...

archive.org...


The video shows Apollo 16 astronaut John Young, supposedly on the lunar surface, and his bare hand!

As we know, it is not possible to remove any part of a spacesuit on the moon, like a glove.

But that's exactly what John Young does, in this clip. He removes his left glove, and shows his bare hand. His fingers, and knuckles, are clearly seen.


I've looked for replies from the Apollo-ites about this issue, but have yet to find anything. And to not see it opposed somewhere is odd, too...


So, if anyone would like to reply to this issue, please do..


And, please stick to this specific issue. It seems the mods have closed our previous moon hoax threads because they went off in all directions. Thanks


huh? where is this ungloved hand? i dont see it? did you link the right clip? or are you seeing something none of us can see perhaps if you can screenshot the actual part where you see his knuckles etc....might help

thanks



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 07:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Sremmos80

Bee sting maybe?

I used to work on a bee farm.
I' have come home with swollen sausage fingers exactly like that.



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 07:12 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



new topics

top topics



 
4
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join