It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Proving the moon landing was a hoax - John Young is caught 'bare handed'.

page: 1
4
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 12:20 AM
link   
This video clip proves, beyond any doubt, that Apollo astronauts did not land on the moon...

The page is linked first, then a link to the specific mpeg clip..

www.hq.nasa.gov...

www.hq.nasa.gov...

This is a link explaining it in detail...

archive.org...


The video shows Apollo 16 astronaut John Young, supposedly on the lunar surface, and his bare hand!

As we know, it is not possible to remove any part of a spacesuit on the moon, like a glove.

But that's exactly what John Young does, in this clip. He removes his left glove, and shows his bare hand. His fingers, and knuckles, are clearly seen.


I've looked for replies from the Apollo-ites about this issue, but have yet to find anything. And to not see it opposed somewhere is odd, too...


So, if anyone would like to reply to this issue, please do..


And, please stick to this specific issue. It seems the mods have closed our previous moon hoax threads because they went off in all directions. Thanks

 


Mod Edit - Since the OP has been shown to be wrong but continues to change the 'goal posts' regarding evidence or proof, this thread is now moved to the LOL forum where that kind of behavior is acceptable.
edit on 9/6/2015 by tothetenthpower because: (no reason given)




posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 12:35 AM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1

I don't see a bare hand. It is quite clearly gloved. More so clearly in the mpg.

edit on 8/16/2015 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 12:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

i have to agree, i dont see a bare hand either.

besides..dont you think the director would notice that? lol



edit on 16-8-2015 by autopat51 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 12:38 AM
link   
Who knows, but this looks like a glove to me. I'm ...agnostic about the moon landings. Why would there be dust on his hand, on the real moon or the fake moon?
edit on 16-8-2015 by Atsbhct because: Drunk grammar.



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 12:38 AM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1

What kind of screen are you watching this on? He clearly has a glove on.



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 12:41 AM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1

Pretty weak stuff there.

Looks like a glove to me, or he has one massive hand.



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 12:42 AM
link   
a reply to: Sremmos80

Bee sting maybe?



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 12:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: turbonium1
The video shows Apollo 16 astronaut John Young, supposedly on the lunar surface, and his bare hand!


No, it does not show his bare hand, why claim it does?



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 12:45 AM
link   
If the glove doesn't fit then you must acquit..wait wrong glove...



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 12:46 AM
link   
Thanks for providing the original source though.
That was helpful. In showing his gloved hand.



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 12:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
Thanks for providing the original source though.
That was helpful. In showing his gloved hand.


I think I saw that they were wearing sandals though... So can we end this all and say if he had no glove it was all faked, and if he had gloves it was all real...



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 12:50 AM
link   
a reply to: Xtrozero

Sounds good to me.

Nice glove you've got there, btw.

edit on 8/16/2015 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 01:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Maybe if we could see how the actual glove looks like from that mission ? It does not look like a pressurised spacesuit glove to me. At least not like the bulky inflated glove Ive seen in previous missions. This glove looks tight fit.



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 01:04 AM
link   
a reply to: MarioOnTheFly
How many pictures would you like?
www.google.com...

And "inflated" is really not the right word. Nor could one simply remove it.
www.brighthub.com...


edit on 8/16/2015 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 01:05 AM
link   
a reply to: MarioOnTheFly

you have to realize..the man inside the suit is quite a bit smaller than the suit itself.
the glove looks right to me.


edit on 16-8-2015 by autopat51 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 01:09 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Yes...i already looked it up....I guess it could be a glove. Though it really does look pretty tight fit.



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 01:22 AM
link   
a reply to: autopat51

Yes i realize the obvious. The glove in the vidio looks different than the one in pics...if there is one. The entire length of the fingers is seen and rather "thin" appearance. I would expect bulky fat fingers...with length partialy hidden by the bulky glove. Anyway...thats what i see.



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 01:29 AM
link   
a reply to: MarioOnTheFly
Here is John Young with a bare left hand.


Here is John Young with what the OP thinks is a bare left hand.



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 01:35 AM
link   
maybe we should question everything!!
what if Columbus faked his journey to the new world!!
would have made a great Monty Python skit


did too, did not, DID TOO, DID NOT!!
edit on 16-8-2015 by autopat51 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 16 2015 @ 01:35 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Your screen is not the best shot of the hand in the video. When he puts his hand on the shoulder of the other astro.

Are you pointing out the difference in color of the hand as a proof that it is a glove ?




top topics



 
4
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join