MIT paves the way for neuro linguistic hacking. Guard your deep grooves people.

originally posted by: Forensick
Maybe best used to cure pedo's and not mind control a whole human race except the Finns.

Numbers aren't the language, they are only important now because of how we used them to make computers, measurements and currency.

They will find a better solution to numbers soon I am sure, and numbers are a type of language we invented after language.

Slightly off-topic here, sorry for that, but your remark about "curing" pedo's triggered me. "Curing" is mostly used in the context of a disease. Pedophilia is no more a disease than homosexuality or bisexuality is. You might consider any of these sexual preferences "undesirable" or even "evil", this largely depends on the culture you were born in. But they are not diseases so they can not be cured.

Covert hypnosis deserves a thread of its own.

I do think that verbal languages has a basic degree that will evaluate in phases over a long period of time. Transmitting images by sound is the first thing man teached from our early beginnings.

However reading non verbal behaviour is a more difficult aspect of our languages. Also some have the amazing talent learn many languages.

The next step in this I presume could be telepathic as twins sometimes unconsciously seem te have. .
This article from the OP reminds me of that movie the minority report..

Someday our thoughts will cease to exist from ourselves and searched by Google. ..

a reply to: SoulSurfer

There is just ONE problem, who's to say that those in power wont use telepathy as a way to masquerade as God?

They already do! They use the Bible, churches & hymns, to tap into human shame, fear & original sin to reinforce a lack of hope, in order to enforce compliance, group think & slavery.

Remember, "God" is just the word "Good", minus an "o", while "Devil" is merely the word "Evil" with a "d" in front of it. God and the Devil are simple representations of an inner struggle between "Good and Evil". The goal of manipulators is to get you to think that you have to turn your "self control" over to those who dispense the "Word of God".

We have to be careful with our speeches, because the energy used on our thoughts is transformed to another type of energy when we talk. And that energy transformation still keep physically in the place where we talk our thoughts.

a reply to: MorgothaM

That explains Genius Loci, and hauntings. Our will and voices imprinting on specific places. Good and bad.

originally posted by: AshFan
MIT has found the "language universal" that connects all human verbal communication. Anyone who has read the excellent book, "Snow Crash" by Neil Stephenson is familiar with the concept that language has been encoded into our deep brain structure, and that you can use, "Tower of Babel" anyone can be controlled by someone who has mastered the technique.

You seem not to have read your own link.

That, or you're a fanatic about the Bene Gesserit.

What has been proposed is a new single "language universal" and it has to do with placing related concepts near each other in sentences.

There are other language universals. One (IIRC) is the "ma" sound associated with words for "mother."

If you want to claim some subconscious control mechanism, well, that's your mom, isn't it?

Harte

a reply to: Harte

Muad'Dib dude.

a reply to: Harte

Have you heard of phonemes bro? There is quite a bit of research and study into proto language.

Genius Bro. Now can we tie it all together?

originally posted by: Brotherman
a reply to: Harte

Have you heard of phonemes bro? There is quite a bit of research and study into proto language.

originally posted by: Brotherman
a reply to: Harte

Have you heard of phonemes bro? There is quite a bit of research and study into proto language.

Phonemes are language-specific.

It's not a universal thing like the MIT thing in the OP or like the "ma" sound I mentioned.

Harte

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: Brotherman
a reply to: Harte

Have you heard of phonemes bro? There is quite a bit of research and study into proto language.

Phonemes are language-specific.

It's not a universal thing like the MIT thing in the OP or like the "ma" sound I mentioned.

Harte

You are smart. What else do you think about?

a reply to: Harte

I disagree, I think phonemes are universal.
If Jung can postulate archetypes' about experience why can't phonemes be archetypical as well? If we are talking about a proto language then we are also saying their was an original means. I think at the core phonemes are not only embedded in our natural psyche but also buried in syntactical and lexical frameworks.

a reply to: Brotherman

Kind of basic. Can you imagine a perception that doesn't care?

originally posted by: AshFan
a reply to: Brotherman

Kind of basic. Can you imagine a perception that doesn't care?

No, nothing is real outside my perception of reality. Can you? When I think I can, it usually drives closer to my imagination and less as perceivable, it really is cruel.

You are my new best friend! If perception is reality, what are the firewall rules?

originally posted by: Brotherman

originally posted by: AshFan
a reply to: Brotherman

Kind of basic. Can you imagine a perception that doesn't care?

No, nothing is real outside my perception of reality. Can you? When I think I can, it usually drives closer to my imagination and less as perceivable, it really is cruel.

a reply to: AshFan


If u can't perceive reality then what is perception? I tend to think perception of reality is individual specific as the collective is secondary

What if instead of creating a religion they study and judge ours as their creators? And what if the offspring of robots disagree with one another, then what?

originally posted by: Brotherman
a reply to: Harte

I disagree, I think phonemes are universal.
If Jung can postulate archetypes' about experience why can't phonemes be archetypical as well? If we are talking about a proto language then we are also saying their was an original means. I think at the core phonemes are not only embedded in our natural psyche but also buried in syntactical and lexical frameworks.

A phoneme is the smallest sound in a word that can bring about a change of meaning.

Like in the word "hat." The phoneme "t" sound at the end can be replaced with the phoneme "d" sound and you have a different word - "had."

All languages use phonemes, but an individual phoneme in one language isn't necessarily used the same way in another language.

That means they are not language universals, except in that the mouth can only make certain sounds.

Phonemes change over time. The past tense of "run" today is "ran" (in English, obviously.) However, the past tense of run used to be "yronne," again, in English.

Harte

originally posted by: AshFan

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: Brotherman
a reply to: Harte

Have you heard of phonemes bro? There is quite a bit of research and study into proto language.

Phonemes are language-specific.

It's not a universal thing like the MIT thing in the OP or like the "ma" sound I mentioned.

Harte

You are smart. What else do you think about?

Obviously, I think about yo mama.

Harte