It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: captainpudding
a reply to: SerpentMoon87
Are you ever going to present any data to back up your wild claims or are you just going to stick with the "I'm right, you're wrong" method of debate and repeatedly refuse to provide even a single shred of evidence for anything you say?
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: SerpentMoon87
That gif cracks me up, the moon is literally just flying past the camera, shouldn't th moon be rotating around earth?
what should be the observed rotation of the moon ??
we know the length of the lunar day
we know the time lapse duration
so come on - how many degrees rotation should the moon exhibit ??????????????
There are slight artifacts in the image caused by the processing, with a green sliver appearing on the right limb of the moon. The images combined to form the natural colour photo were taken by EPIC about 30 seconds apart, and the moon’s position changed as the camera recorded the views with the red, green and blue filters, NASA said.
originally posted by: captainpudding
a reply to: SerpentMoon87
So, you have absolutely zero evidence to back up your repeated claims, got it. Can you at least explain why you think a modern cell phone uses 1960's technology?
originally posted by: SerpentMoon87
originally posted by: captainpudding
a reply to: SerpentMoon87
So, you have absolutely zero evidence to back up your repeated claims, got it. Can you at least explain why you think a modern cell phone uses 1960's technology?
This is off topic, they are not my claims, what is so hard to understand about that, people that you trust do so, not my problem you can't invest time reading radiation study papers and research data.
originally posted by: SerpentMoon87
a reply to:
It's all circuit based, the materials are all the same. It's been compressed, that is it. We still drive 100 year old combustion engines. It just looks different now. It makes absolutely no difference to radiation what it looks like, bigger? The more surface area exposed, it's not that complicated.
originally posted by: SerpentMoon87
a reply to:
It's all circuit based, the materials are all the same. It's been compressed, that is it. We still drive 100 year old combustion engines. It just looks different now. It makes absolutely no difference to radiation what it looks like, bigger? The more surface area exposed, it's not that complicated.
originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
a reply to: SerpentMoon87
Here are two views of the moon taken 5 hours apart as viewed from the Sun using screenshots from Stellarium
How much rotation do you see?
originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
a reply to: SerpentMoon87
Sources required.