It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Exposed: The Faces and Fake Names of the People Behind Planned Parenthood Attack Videos

page: 1
18
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 31 2015 @ 06:07 PM
link   
Exposed: The Faces and Fake Names of the People Behind Planned Parenthood Attack Videos




I wanted to let you know I have nothing to do with this, and I don’t support what David is doing. He’s entitled to his views, but he has to find an honest way to go about expressing them. And lying and manipulating videos and people to express a point just undermines his own credibility."





As you know—you played those clips—when you watch those four videos, the Planned Parenthood officials are literally saying the opposite of wanting to profit from fetal body parts. And I really mean that. They are literally saying, time and again, "No one wants to profit from this. We are not trying to."





DR. WILLIE PARKER: Well, the effort to defund Planned Parenthood is under the notion that if you stop Planned Parenthood, you’ll stop abortion. But that’s far from the truth. Planned Parenthood has been around for a hundred years. And most of what they do, well over 90 percent, is provide well woman care, basic healthcare for men, women and families, and 90 percent of what they do has nothing to do with abortion.



Look a shiny object..


Why do people continue to believe the garbage that this guy is sending out. They are obviously heavily edited videos, so are people buying in into this?




posted on Jul, 31 2015 @ 06:10 PM
link   
I'm telling you...there is something "not right" with this person. Methinks he's dug himself a very deep hole.

edit on 7/31/2015 by ~Lucidity because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 31 2015 @ 06:12 PM
link   
a reply to: krosnos

Of course it was a sham company, it was an investigative journalism cover identity.
edit on 31-7-2015 by greencmp because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 31 2015 @ 06:17 PM
link   
Well naturally a source story from democracynow is going to give a full unbiased version right?

It would be great if they could actually put up some genuine proof.

But nope, another dud Watson.

pffft

Big desperation efforts underway.




posted on Jul, 31 2015 @ 06:20 PM
link   
a reply to: ~Lucidity

You are 100% certain the man in that CNN show is *really* the same guy?

CNN has been known to use actors and much deception.

What was left out of the interview?



+7 more 
posted on Jul, 31 2015 @ 06:24 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Like the sources you use are unbiased in any way. Pot.... meet kettle.



posted on Jul, 31 2015 @ 06:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: greencmp
a reply to: krosnos

Of course it was a sham company, it was an investigate journalism cover identity.

Yeah, sure. It kinda morphed into journalism. Once the lawsuits started. Mmmmhmm.

The Shady Anti-Choice Actors Behind The Deceptive Video Accusing Planned Parenthood Of "Selling Aborted Baby Parts"

By the way, they're asking for donations on their website now. They're going to need it for their legal bills.






edit on 7/31/2015 by ~Lucidity because: I was just not satisfied with the aesthetic layout of the post.



posted on Jul, 31 2015 @ 06:28 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Lin ky



posted on Jul, 31 2015 @ 06:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Blazemore2000
a reply to: xuenchen

Like the sources you use are unbiased in any way. Pot.... meet kettle.


well that was soooo clever !!




posted on Jul, 31 2015 @ 06:30 PM
link   
a reply to: ~Lucidity

MediaMatters is another excellent source.

Funded by George Soros.

Can't argue with success they say.



Edit to add proof of bias.

edit on Jul-31-2015 by xuenchen because: #cicil needs a root canal



posted on Jul, 31 2015 @ 06:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: ~Lucidity
a reply to: xuenchen

Lin ky


Looks like the makeup artists did a good job.



but sure, it may have been the real guy.



posted on Jul, 31 2015 @ 06:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: ~Lucidity

MediaMatters is another excellent source.

Funded by George Soros.

Can't argue with success they say.





Media Matters, with all its alleged faults, is heads above most of the tripe on the internet. What is takes is to start there and then do some digging on your own, from ALL perspectives, and compare, and then apply some common sense.



posted on Jul, 31 2015 @ 06:34 PM
link   
a reply to: ~Lucidity

You know, it's kind of weird that they use the term "human capital", I thought that term was related to treating employees as fungible commodities.

Is it an actual term used internally or just what CMP calls it?
edit on 31-7-2015 by greencmp because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 31 2015 @ 06:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: ~Lucidity

MediaMatters is another excellent source.

Funded by George Soros.

Can't argue with success they say.



Edit to add proof of bias.


Yeah, Media Matters and Democracy Now aren't exactly non-partisan but, the gloves are off now so I expect all hands to battle stations.

edit on 31-7-2015 by greencmp because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 31 2015 @ 06:35 PM
link   
a reply to: ~Lucidity

But they are extreme Left Wing bias.

Nothing wrong with that, but now isn't the time for question marks about sources, especially when the "video" sources are being questioned.




posted on Jul, 31 2015 @ 06:36 PM
link   
a reply to: greencmp


Human capital is the stock of knowledge, habits, social and personality attributes, including creativity, embodied in the ability to perform labor so as to produce economic value. [Wiki]


The way Wiki defines it here is the way I've most seen it used.



posted on Jul, 31 2015 @ 06:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: ~Lucidity

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: ~Lucidity

MediaMatters is another excellent source.

Funded by George Soros.

Can't argue with success they say.





Media Matters, with all its alleged faults, is heads above most of the tripe on the internet. What is takes is to start there and then do some digging on your own, from ALL perspectives, and compare, and then apply some common sense.


Well, gee, you can do that with a lot of right-leaning sites too.



posted on Jul, 31 2015 @ 06:41 PM
link   
a reply to: krosnos

So we hate whistle-blowers now?

(I can never keep it straight)



posted on Jul, 31 2015 @ 06:41 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Besides being clever... it was also as true as true gets.



posted on Jul, 31 2015 @ 06:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: greencmp
a reply to: krosnos

Of course it was a sham company, it was an investigative journalism cover identity.


It's actually backed by a right wing think tank. I am thinking they did not think this through very well.




top topics



 
18
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join