GoodGopher.com: Anti Propoganda Search Engine Open For Public Test Drive

I make no claims nor am I completely sold on it as of yet.

But it's still one hell of an idea if it does what it is meant to do.

GoodGopher.com

How it works:

GoodGopher crawls the internet for human knowledge.

Sites with ties to globalist corporations or Big Governments are banned. If they sneak through, they get filtered out with the help of users.

This causes more honest, independent sites to rise to the top of the search results:

Independent activists, journalists, scientists and bloggers.
Independent Media websites.
Sites that question the status quo instead of parroting it.
Genuine non-profits that work for humanity, not corporate interests.
Alternative science websites that can help move humanity forward.
Sites promoting liberty, crypto-currency and more.

GoodGopher also welcomes international news publishers located outside the USA, many of which tend to have far higher journalistic integrity than the corporate-influenced mainstream media in the USA.

www.goodgopher.com...

Give it a shot and make sure to give it a chance before dismissal as many will most likely be prepared to do. And BTW...The logo is a squirrel...how can that be any kind of wrong?

Have fun!

Jude

a reply to: jude11

Sometimes a "anti-propaganda" source is pushed by an agenda.

So I searched for the KGB's Operation Infektion on this allegedly neutral search engine.

Guess what? No results. All traces of it removed.

I call this search engine a Bad Idea.

a reply to: jude11

It's a start, and about damn time too.

After a bit of research I think that I will list my web site with them. Getting Google to pick me up was a nightmare.

Also: although New York Times entries have been removed from the search engine, the entries from Pravda.ru (a known anti-american, pro-russian propaganda source) were kept.

I smell political polarisation.

Sorry OP.

a reply to: swanne

So...what it comes down to as far as search engines are who's agenda best fits the person that is using them.

So... It filters, too?

And you think that "good filtering" is in any way better than "bad filtering"? Why?
And is there a list of those sites which are banned? Not because I want to visit them, but I like to know what I am not to know.

Sorry, but I dislike filtering. Be it google or goodgopher.

originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: jude11

Sometimes a "anti-propaganda" source is pushed by an agenda.

So I searched for the KGB's Operation Infektion on this allegedly neutral search engine.

Guess what? No results. All traces of it removed.

I call this search engine a Bad Idea.

One search should not a conclusion make. And is it a bad idea or just not ready?

The BETA term is used for a reason. But we are all free to either give it time or dismiss immediately.

I'll give it time.

Thanks,

Jude

originally posted by: swanne
Also: although New York Times entries have been removed from the search engine, the entries from Pravda.ru (a known anti-american, pro-russian propaganda source) were kept.

I smell political polarisation.

Sorry OP.

So in other words, it is a Kremlin approved search engine for the peasants.

originally posted by: jude11

One search should not a conclusion make.

I am at a dozen searches now. Still seeing a bias in the choices of which entries are removed

And is it a bad idea or just not ready?

The two are not mutually exclusive. Besides, in the future, what better convenient excuses for the omission of information than "oh, sorry you didn't hear about that information, it's just that this part of the search engine is under construction! "

Thank you OP for this information, I am going to keep an eye on this website.

a reply to: jude11

I'll give it a shot and report back.

fail to see the point of this. anyone who is in the target audience of this engine already possesses a high tech bioelectric search filter called a brain, which is already programmed to the person's exact perspective and reprogrammable in real-time in response to new information.

Former KGB explains how to brainwash a nation;
www.federaljack.com...

PBS whitewashes Oswald's KGB connections;
www.newswithviews.com...

KGB trained subverter tells about the 4 stages of Communistic takeovers;
www.federaljack.com...


Russian trolls are harassing media figures;
www.thecommonsenseshow.com...


Russian trolls among us;
globalwarming-arclein.blogspot.ca...




Give it a while and I'm sure the Wikipedia page for Operation Infektion will be available.

Unless wiki is filtered out.

I have a torrid relationship with squirrels, they take a bite outa my tomatoes, I curse and scream and run for my rifle and game cookbook.

Thanks for the post, not sure it effects me as I pay utter disregard to the top billed search engine results to my queries anyway as we all know theyre just hooks half the time.

WAIT...you say they use a squirrel for Good Gopher .com? Gophers are gonna get pissed, maybe the squirrel identifies as a gopher.

originally posted by: FyreByrd
a reply to: jude11

I'll give it a shot and report back.

Yup, still working with it. VERY Beta stage.

But then so was windows, firefox, chrome, any and all games, cars, new tech gadgets...everything.

And as with anything else, a wait and see approach is always the way IMO.

Jude

originally posted by: jude11
... And BTW...The logo is a squirrel...how can that be any kind of wrong?

Actually, I think that the logo is not a squirrel, but a ... GOPHER!

Squirrels have bushy tails. It's a gopher.

originally posted by: incoserv

originally posted by: jude11
... And BTW...The logo is a squirrel...how can that be any kind of wrong?

Actually, I think that the logo is not a squirrel, but a ... GOPHER!

Squirrels have bushy tails. It's a gopher.

CRAP!

You're right of course.

Hence the name...oops...

Squirpher?

Jude

I searched fluoride research and all that came up was from fluoridealert. A site that gets paid to spread fear and lies. No thanks. I stick with Google and do my own research.

The URL submit doesn't work.

I must be submitting propaganda.