It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: cavtrooper7
There have been rumors that a couple of incidents were allowed to happen because the leadership wanted more ASW money, and needed something to point to as reasoning for it.
With the collapse of the old Soviet Navy in the early 1990s, the USN [U.S. Navy] began to de-emphasize its ASW [anti-submarine warfare] capabilities, figuring that the preeminent submarine threat had essentially evaporated, and it would take years — perhaps decades — for a similar challenge to emerge.
Read more: defensetech.org...
Defense.org
I'm sure we knew it was there, how we reacted is another topic for speculation…
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Sammamishman
It would have been forced to the surface if it had been detected. As is it surfaced on its own. Powned…
If you think that it was such a huge embarrassment for the USN then why did we know about it at all.
It would be useful to establish exactly what happened. What seems to be established is that a US airplane spotted the Song on the surface within 5 nm of Kitty Hawk. What is asserted is that Song approached submerged to within 5 nm of Kitty Hawk and then surfaced. Finding out just when and where (relative to the carrier) the submarine actually did surface would help in discussing this event.
Read more: defensetech.org...
Defense.org