NASA’s 1971 Apollo 15 Video Clip Shows UFO Parked On Lunar Surface Observing Moon Landing, (?)

Good job onebigmonkey. I was going to ask how a mountain top can cast a shadow but your pic has the exact same shadow...... only one conclusion.... a mountain top!

originally posted by: wmd_2008

originally posted by: Doozied
wow looking at the footage again I could not see what I saw before and that is a square boarder around the craft that was pixelated and now I have changed my view about the craft and my view is that it looks and could very well could be genuine and I think that the craft would have to have been seen by the crew it was close enough to be obvious

If you look through the thread you would have saw this gif by member Ectoplasm8

It's not a ufo !ok good point and you have set me straight I now am back to my original understanding and that is the clip is fake

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
The footage from the OP video is from the live TV broadcast, and the supposed UFO is actually the summit of a distant hill lit by the sun, which I have outlined in red in this google moon screenshot:

You can also see it in many still images, eg

www.lpi.usra.edu...

Your explanation is inconsistent with the image of the anomalous object, which CLEARLY shows a GAP between the bright object and the Moon's surface, indicating that it was hovering.

And as for that animated gif, I must point out that it has been faked in order to explain away the anomaly, because the video clip clearly indicates that the anomalous object was much further to the right of the Moon lander, not directly behind it. If that had been the correct perceptive, there would have been no need for the film camera to be panned around the landscape before the image came into view. So the gif is an obvious fake, not the anomalous object.

a reply to: micpsi

You're kidding, right? Please tell me you are, and you don't actually believe the tripe you posted, especially when faced with the overwhelming evidence to the contrary presented in this thread.

a reply to: micpsi


YOU clearly haven't got a clue what your looking at!

originally posted by: micpsi
And as for that animated gif, I must point out that it has been faked in order to explain away the anomaly, because the video clip clearly indicates that the anomalous object was much further to the right of the Moon lander, not directly behind it. If that had been the correct perceptive, there would have been no need for the film camera to be panned around the landscape before the image came into view. So the gif is an obvious fake, not the anomalous object.

Normally I would ask you to provide some kind of evidence of how my gif was faked, but it's not even worth the effort. After briefly looking over your posting history, you seem to have a habit of popping into various topics on ATS with the purpose of stirring the pot and supporting ignorance, rather than denying it, then *POOF* you're gone. I'm not interested in that silly game.

Thanks for bumping a thread that was dropping to the bottom though. Maybe it will help some hardcore UFO/alien believers to realize that jumping immediately to an alien conclusion isn't always the answer.

originally posted by: micpsi

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
The footage from the OP video is from the live TV broadcast, and the supposed UFO is actually the summit of a distant hill lit by the sun, which I have outlined in red in this google moon screenshot:

You can also see it in many still images, eg

www.lpi.usra.edu...

Your explanation is inconsistent with the image of the anomalous object, which CLEARLY shows a GAP between the bright object and the Moon's surface, indicating that it was hovering.

And as for that animated gif, I must point out that it has been faked in order to explain away the anomaly, because the video clip clearly indicates that the anomalous object was much further to the right of the Moon lander, not directly behind it. If that had been the correct perceptive, there would have been no need for the film camera to be panned around the landscape before the image came into view. So the gif is an obvious fake, not the anomalous object.

Thank goodness someone else can see the emperor is not wearing any clothes!

I don't know why there is so much focus on other pictures and not the original video which the discussion is about. No one can clearly show the hill from stills of the video, and you are right there is clearly space between the craft and the ground, not to mention the underside shadow.

People, if you want to disprove that this is not a UFO, focus on the video and please don't insult our intelligence with some pictures that are quite different from the video, could have been taken from different angles, different distance, could have been altered...........WHO CARES ABOUT OTHER PICTURES, IT IS THE VIDEO WE ARE DISCUSSING.

originally posted by: admirethedistance
a reply to: micpsi

You're kidding, right? Please tell me you are, and you don't actually believe the tripe you posted, especially when faced with the overwhelming evidence to the contrary presented in this thread.

The evidence posted in this thread that supports the UFO is solid, anything indicating it is a hill is flimsy, circumstantial, and just an opinion.

Try to focus on the stills or video of the video in question. Any other pictures mean very little, they could have been taken from different angles, different distances, could have been tampered with.

IF ET UFOs exist then it is obvious the government has covered it up and would come out with some kind of altered picture to deny this great video of a true UFO, do you deny that is even a possibility?

Focus on the still I posted above from the original video, I refuse to discuss other pictures that may be interesting but not really relevant to the thread. IT IS ABOUT THE VIDEO IN THE OP.

a reply to: PlanetXisHERE


People are showing pictures because the video is poor VERY poor quality


As the picture used on the gif a few posts back, has been taken on the surface by the astronauts using the Hasselblad camera and as been available for ALL to see long before this BS ufo nonsense was thought up PROVE that has been edited, also prove what is claimed to be a shadow under the claimed ufo is actually what you say.

We all know there is more chance of you proving Santa exists.

a reply to: micpsi

Your explanation is completely at odds with facts. I am sure that if you wanted to, you could record a little tour in Google Moon and demonstrate that when you get to ground level you don't get to see the mound I have identified poking out beyond St George's crater. I did one just now. It's very easy. You can prove to the world right now that I am wrong. Or you could run away and not bother.

There is no gap between the UFO and the ground, because it is not a UFO what you are seeing is a shadow. Light and shade. Nothing more.

originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE

I don't know why there is so much focus on other pictures and not the original video which the discussion is about. No one can clearly show the hill from stills of the video, and you are right there is clearly space between the craft and the ground, not to mention the underside shadow.

People, if you want to disprove that this is not a UFO, focus on the video and please don't insult our intelligence with some pictures that are quite different from the video, could have been taken from different angles, different distance, could have been altered...........WHO CARES ABOUT OTHER PICTURES, IT IS THE VIDEO WE ARE DISCUSSING.

Nope. Sorry. You don't get to choose what is acceptable as evidence in this. The photos have been posted to demonstrate that you are mistaken, and do so quite convincingly. They have been in the publi domain for decades, as has the live TV broadcast from which these stills are taken.

There is no gap, there is no UFO.

Also. I've been away so I may have missed it: how do you explain the UFO hovering at such an extreme angle? The stills getting posted imply that the features are level, but they are not.

originally posted by: onebigmonkey

originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE

I don't know why there is so much focus on other pictures and not the original video which the discussion is about. No one can clearly show the hill from stills of the video, and you are right there is clearly space between the craft and the ground, not to mention the underside shadow.

People, if you want to disprove that this is not a UFO, focus on the video and please don't insult our intelligence with some pictures that are quite different from the video, could have been taken from different angles, different distance, could have been altered...........WHO CARES ABOUT OTHER PICTURES, IT IS THE VIDEO WE ARE DISCUSSING.

Nope. Sorry. You don't get to choose what is acceptable as evidence in this. The photos have been posted to demonstrate that you are mistaken, and do so quite convincingly. They have been in the publi domain for decades, as has the live TV broadcast from which these stills are taken.

There is no gap, there is no UFO.

Also. I've been away so I may have missed it: how do you explain the UFO hovering at such an extreme angle? The stills getting posted imply that the features are level, but they are not.

Yes, you are right, I don't get to choose the evidence, actually the evidence speaks for itself.

We are talking about the video, not about some GIF the disinfo specialists at NASA made.

If you would like to talk about some picture NASA cobbled together why don't you start a thread on it?

I'm surprised some here can't tell the difference between a hill and something that is not a hill.

originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
I'm surprised some here can't tell the difference between a hill and something that is not a hill.

Not half as surprised as I am that anyone is still clinging to the idiotic conclusion that a hill is not a hill. It doesn't get any more obvious. The fact that you refuse to acknowledge it only goes to show that some people are so desperate to beleive in nonsense, that they have lost any and all critical thinking ability that they may have once had.

It's quite sad, really.

a reply to: admirethedistance

Do you think I should listen to you and not think for myself? Don't be so invested in what I think, it is just an opinion, I believe I see a UFO and others think it is a hill. It is touching that you have such concern for my opinions.

So you don't believe that it is possible the government has covered up an ongoing alien interaction with earth? Given, hypothetically that there is an ongoing alien interaction with earth, do you think it is possible NASA would attempt to explain away such evidence?

originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
a reply to: admirethedistance

Do you think I should listen to you and not think for myself?

Not at all. I don't want anybody to blindly accept anything I say. But when every image clearly shows a hill, and everybody but you and one other person agrees, beyond any doubt, that it's a hill, maybe it's time to re-think your position.

originally posted by: admirethedistance

originally posted by: PlanetXisHERE
a reply to: admirethedistance

Do you think I should listen to you and not think for myself?

Not at all. I don't want anybody to blindly accept anything I say. But when every image clearly shows a hill, and everybody but you agrees, beyond any doubt, that it's a hill, maybe it's time to re-think your position.

There you go, attempting to speak for everyone again. Attempting to force a consensus. You do realize that is a disinformation tactic, right?

There are a few posters that agree with me, maybe not the majority, but a few. So I'm not sure why you would lie about that.

originally posted by: micpsi

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
The footage from the OP video is from the live TV broadcast, and the supposed UFO is actually the summit of a distant hill lit by the sun, which I have outlined in red in this google moon screenshot:

You can also see it in many still images, eg

www.lpi.usra.edu...

Your explanation is inconsistent with the image of the anomalous object, which CLEARLY shows a GAP between the bright object and the Moon's surface, indicating that it was hovering.

And as for that animated gif, I must point out that it has been faked in order to explain away the anomaly, because the video clip clearly indicates that the anomalous object was much further to the right of the Moon lander, not directly behind it. If that had been the correct perceptive, there would have been no need for the film camera to be panned around the landscape before the image came into view. So the gif is an obvious fake, not the anomalous object.

a reply to: PlanetXisHERE

You're right, I didn't realize there were two of you still arguing against hills being hills. I edited my above post.

originally posted by: admirethedistance
a reply to: PlanetXisHERE

You're right, I didn't realize there were two of you still arguing against hills being hills. I edited my above post.

Please. For someone claiming to be the champion of the facts you seem to be having some problems with them. I only need to go back a few pages to discover other posters who are open to the idea this is a UFO or who believe it is a UFO:

originally posted by: Doozied
wow looking at the footage again I could not see what I saw before and that is a square boarder around the craft that was pixelated and now I have changed my view about the craft and my view is that it looks and could very well could be genuine and I think that the craft would have to have been seen by the crew it was close enough to be obvious

originally posted by: Kratos40
a reply to: canucks555

In preparation to throw away this account (as I am surprised it didn't happen sooner), I had an interesting conversation with Astronaut John Young a few years ago via chat.
The Apollo 16 module saw things and confirmed what Apollo 15 witnessed/recorded. Also what the Lunar Orbiters beforehand recorded.
Not many, but there are stuff that was left behind in a hurry, or was caught by surprise and destroyed. Millions, if not billions of years old.
Captain Young would not elaborate any further. Don't ask. Just leaving it for your consumption.

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: wmd_2008

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: reldra

Did you also catch that it's just a hilltop?

I read the entire thread. I saw pictures of hills. It doesn't convince me that what is in the picture or the short video I saw is a hill.

Yet another that thinks LOW RES pictures are something else!

Why would low res automatically make it a hill?

originally posted by: JourneymanWelder
if aliens landed on the white house lawn you guys would still demand proof

originally posted by: funbox
a reply to: baddmove

cheers for the link

slowed to 15% of actual speed and zoomed

seems to be a lot of activity around the 'hill' lots of specks of light zipping about , but I doubt they're spaceships

funbox

a reply to: PlanetXisHERE

Funny that you have to RELY on low res images to push your BS about it being a ufo

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: canucks555 I have seen probably thousands of pictures and short videos form moon landings claiming to show alien craft. This is the first one that caused me to make some kind of loud noise...one of astonishment and sit straight up in my chair. Very good catch.

I would echo those sentiments. Though there seem to be a lot of posters who would like this thread to die and make comments to that effect, as if they were forced to be on here while others speculated about the images in the video.